Advertisement

Sodium reduction in selected fish products by means of salt substitutes

  • Editha Giese
  • Carsten Meyer
  • Ute Ostermeyer
  • Ines Lehmann
  • Jan FritscheEmail author
Original Paper
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

High dietary salt intake is a risk factor for hypertension and a public health challenge worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of salt substitutes on the safety and quality of selected fish products, i.e., Matjes nordische Art and cold-smoked salmon. Sodium chloride was replaced by various salt substitutes including potassium chloride, potassium lactate, and commercial salt substitutes. Fish samples were characterized comprehensively with regard to microbiological, physico-chemical, and sensory parameters. During storage for 4 weeks at 3 °C, the commercial reference product of Matjes nordische Art (5.2 g salt/100 g) and the sodium-reduced samples (2.7–3.7 g salt/100 g) did not differ significantly (p < 0.05) with regard to aerobic and anaerobic mesophilic counts, organoleptic properties, texture, color, and the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Moreover, 61 consumers did not discriminate in liking between the reference product and the reformulated samples. During storage for 3 weeks at 6 °C, sodium-reduced samples of cold-smoked salmon (1.4–2.3 g salt/100 g) did not differ significantly from the reference product (2.9 g salt/100 g) with respect to aerobic and anaerobic mesophilic counts, odor, and the growth of L. monocytogenes (at 7 °C). This study indicates the scientific feasibility of a product reformulation of these fish products under laboratory conditions. Before a market launch of the reformulated fish products can be considered, product development trials under real-life conditions including long-term storage trials at retail level will be necessary to meet product-specific safety and quality requirements.

Keywords

Sodium reduction Salt substitute Cold-smoked salmon Consumer test Challenge test Food reformulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support programme. The authors would like to thank Friesenkrone Feinkost for producing the Matjes nordische Art and for their technical advice. We also thank the KIN GmbH as well as Kai-Uwe Scholibo, Isabel Delgado Blas, Sven Blechner, and Svenja Feuerhahn for their technical support. We would like to thank Jungbunzlauer for providing sub4salt®.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The project was supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support programme. The funding source had no involvement in the conduct of the research and the preparation of the article.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Supplementary material

217_2019_3277_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 12 kb)
217_2019_3277_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 90 kb)
217_2019_3277_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (89 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 89 kb)
217_2019_3277_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (89 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 88 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ (2013) Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ 346:f1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gay HC, Rao SG, Vaccarino V, Ali MK (2016) Effects of different dietary interventions on blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension 67:733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mozaffarian D, Fahimi S, Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Engell RE, Lim S, Danaei G, Ezzati M, Powles J (2014) Global sodium consumption and death from cardiovascular causes. NEJM 371:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, Chalmers J, Rodgers A, Rahimi K (2016) Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387:957–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO (2013) Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020, Geneva. https://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  7. 7.
    EC (European Commission) (2014) Survey on Member States’ Implementation of the EU Salt Reduction Framework, Brussels. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/df7ef17e-d643-4593-94b3-84bacfa7a76a. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  8. 8.
    WHO (2016) Salt reduction, Geneva. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salt-reduction. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  9. 9.
    Allison A, Fouladkhah A (2018) Adoptable interventions, human health, and food safety considerations for reducing sodium content of processed food products. Foods 7:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    EC (2009) National salt initiatives. Implementing the EU framework for salt reduction initiatives, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/documents/salt_initiative.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  11. 11.
    BMEL (Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture) (2017) In: BMEL (ed) Leitsätze 2017—Deutsches Lebensmittelbuch. Behr’s Verlag, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martínez-Alvarez O, Borderías AJ, Gómez-Guillén MC (2005) Sodium replacement in the cod (Gadus morhua) muscle salting process. Food Chem 93:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodrigues MJ, Ho P, López-Caballero ME, Bandarra NM, Nunes ML (2005) Chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of cod products salted in different brines. J Food Sci 70:M1–M6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuentes A, Fernández-Segovia I, Barat JM, Serra JA (2011) Influence of sodium replacement and packaging on quality and shelf life of smoked sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). LWT Food Sci Technol 44:917–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuentes A, Fernández-Segovia I, Serra JA, Barat JM (2010) Development of a smoked sea bass product with partial sodium replacement. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1426–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuentes A, Fernández-Segovia I, Serra JA, Barat JM (2012) Effect of partial sodium replacement on physicochemical parameters of smoked sea bass during storage. Food Sci Technol Int 18:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osheba AS (2013) Technological attempts for production of low sodium smoked herring fish (Renga). Adv J Food Sci Technol 5:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Faralizadeh S, Zakipour Rahimabadi E, Khanipour AA (2016) The influence of sodium chloride replacement with potassium chloride on quality changes of hot smoked Kilka (Clupeonella cultriventris caspia) during storage at ± 4 °C. Iran J Fish Sci 15:662–676Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Almli VL, Hersleth M (2013) Salt replacement and injection salting in smoked salmon evaluated from descriptive and hedonic sensory perspectives. Aquac Int 21:1091–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rizo A, Fuentes A, Fernández-Segovia I, Barat JM (2017) Development of a novel smoke-flavoured trout product: an approach to sodium reduction and shelf life assessment. J Food Eng 211:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barat JM, Pérez-Esteve E, Aristoy MC, Toldrá F (2013) Partial replacement of sodium in meat and fish products by using magnesium salts. A review. Plant Soil 368:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoppu U, Hopia A, Pohjanheimo T, Rotola-Pukkila M, Mäkinen S, Pihlanto A, Sandell M (2017) Effect of salt reduction on consumer acceptance and sensory quality of food. Foods 6:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    US FDA (2018) Food Additive Status List, Silver Spring. https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm091048.htm. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  24. 24.
    EC (2001) Commission Decision of 25 September 2001 authorising the placing on the market of trehalose as a novel food or novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C (2001) 2687) (2001/721/EC). Off J Eur Commun L 269:17Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cargill (2018) TREHA™ trehalose—high-performance flavor. One simple ingredient, Minneapolis. https://www.cargill.com/food-bev/na/treha-trehalose. Accessed 04 Aug 2018
  26. 26.
    Karl H, Äkesson G, Etienne M, Huidobro A, Luten J, Mendes R, Tejada M, Oehlenschläger J (2002) WEFTA interlaboratory comparison on salt determination in fishery products. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 11:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smedes F (1999) Determination of total lipid using non-chlorinated solvents. Analyst 124:1711–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karl H, Oehlenschläger J, Bekaert K, Bergé JP, Cadun A, Duflos G, Poli BM, Tejada M, Testi S, Timm-Heinrich M (2012) WEFTA interlaboratory comparison on total lipid determination in fishery products using the smedes method. J AOAC Int 95:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    AOAC (2005) Method #968.06. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international, 18th edn. AOAC International, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Naila A, Flint S, Fletcher G, Bremer P, Meerdink G (2010) Control of biogenic amines in food—existing and emerging approaches. J Food Sci 75:R139–R150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    US FDA (2011) In: US FDA (ed) Fish and fishery products hazards and controls guidance, 4th edn. US Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gram L, Trolle G, Huss HH (1987) Detection of specific spoilage bacteria from fish stored at low (0 °C) and high (20 °C) temperatures. Int J Food Microbiol 4:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walker SJ, Archer P, Banks JG (1990) Growth of Listeria monocytogenes at refrigeration temperatures. J Appl Microbiol 68:157–162Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jami M, Ghanbari M, Zunabovic M, Domig KJ, Kneifel W (2014) Listeria monocytogenes in aquatic food products—a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 13:798–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    European Union (2018) RASFF—the rapid alert system for food and feed—2017 annual report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/news/rapid-alert-system-food-and-feed-annual-report-2018-sep-25_en. Accessed 03 Mar 2019
  36. 36.
    EC (2005) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance). Off J Eur Union L 338:1Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    DIN (German Institute for Standardization) (2005) Microbiology of the food chain—Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.—Part 2: Enumeration method (ISO 11290-2:2017); DIN EN ISO 11290-2:2017-09. Beuth Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    DIN (1999) Sensory analysis—investigation of profiles—part 1: Conventional profiling; DIN 10967-1:1999-10. Beuth Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    DIN (2008) Sensory analysis—Consumer sensory evaluation; DIN 10974:2008-12. Beuth Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    EC (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Off J Eur Union L 404:9Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    EC (2012) Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (Text with EEA relevance). Off J Eur Union L 136:1Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boziaris IS, Skandamis PN, Anastasiadi M, Nychas GJE (2007) Effect of NaCl and KCl on fate and growth/no growth interfaces of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A at different pH and nisin concentrations. J Appl Microbiol 102:796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DIN (2017) Sensory analysis—methodology—general guidance for conducting hedonic tests with consumers in a controlled area (ISO 11136:2014); DIN EN ISO 11136:2017-10. Beuth Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hough G, Wakeling I, Mucci A, Chambers E, Gallardo IM, Alves LR (2006) Number of consumers necessary for sensory acceptability tests. Food Qual Pref 17:522–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    EC (2002) Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Off J Eur Commun L 31:1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Editha Giese
    • 1
  • Carsten Meyer
    • 1
  • Ute Ostermeyer
    • 1
  • Ines Lehmann
    • 1
  • Jan Fritsche
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Safety and Quality of Milk and Fish ProductsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and FoodKielGermany

Personalised recommendations