Advertisement

Comparative study on the acceptability and consumer appeal of commercial products and research-optimised low-salt frankfurters and cooked ham manufactured using high-pressure processing and organic acids

  • Ciara M. O’Neill
  • Malco C. Cruz-Romero
  • Geraldine Duffy
  • Joe P. KerryEmail author
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability and consumer (n = 100) appeal of research-optimised low-salt (ROLS) frankfurters or cooked ham manufactured using high-pressure processing (HPP) and organic acids as hurdles and compared to research control and gold standard commercially available products. For frankfurters, consumers preferred the firmness and saltiness of the ROLS and research control frankfurters while the flavour and juiciness of commercial frankfurters was preferred. In terms of overall sensory acceptability (OSA), the ROLS frankfurter was liked just as much as the commercial brand frankfurter. For cooked ham, the appearance and firmness of ROLS and research control cooked ham was preferred while the juiciness of the commercial cooked ham was preferred. Consumers did not find significant differences in flavour, saltiness or OSA and the ROLS cooked ham was liked just as much as the commercial brand cooked ham. Overall, these results indicate that the ROLS processed meat products were just as acceptable or better than the gold standard commercially available products confirming the potential of the use of response surface methodology to optimise salt replacer Artisalt™, HPP and organic acids to manufacture consumer-accepted low-salt processed meat products with enhanced safety and shelf life.

Keywords

High-pressure processing Processed meat Organic acids Consumer study Hurdle technology Low salt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided under the National Development Plan, through the Food Institutional Research Measure (FIRM), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Ireland. Grant number: 11/F/031.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with animal or human subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Grasso S, Brunton N, Lyng J, Lalor F, Monahan F (2014) Healthy processed meat products—regulatory, reformulation and consumer challenges. Trends Food Sci Technol 39:4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiss J, Gibis M, Schuh V, Salminen H (2010) Advances in ingredient and processing systems for meat and meat products. Meat Sci 86:196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ (2013) Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ 346:f1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morgan T, Aubert J-F, Brunner H (2001) Interaction between sodium intake, angiotensin II, and blood pressure as a cause of cardiac hypertrophy. Am j Hypertens 14:914–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doyle ME, Glass KA (2010) Sodium reduction and its effect on food safety, food quality, and human health. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruusunen M, Poulanne E (2004) Sodium in meat products. International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. University of Helsinki, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilcast D, Angus F (2007) Reducing salt in foods: practical strategies. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mújica-Paz H, Valdez-Fragoso A, Samson CT, Welti-Chanes J, Torres JA (2011) High-pressure processing technologies for the pasteurization and sterilization of foods. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheftel JC, Culioli J (1997) Effects of high pressure on meat: a review. Meat Sci 46:211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodríguez-Calleja J, Cruz-Romero M, O’sullivan M, García-López M, Kerry J (2012) High-pressure-based hurdle strategy to extend the shelf-life of fresh chicken breast fillets. Food Res Control 25:516–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lyndhurst B (2009) An evidence review of public attitudes to emerging food technologies. Social Science Research Unit, Food Standards Agency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorenson D, Henchion M, Marcos B, Ward P, Mullen AM, Allen P (2011) Consumer acceptance of high pressure processed beef-based chilled ready meals: the mediating role of food-related lifestyle factors. Meat Sci 87:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butz P, Needs EC, Baron A, Bayer O, Geisel B, Gupta B (2003) Consumer attitudes to high pressure food processing. Food Agric Environ 1(1):30–34Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’ Neill CM, Cruz-Romero MC, Duffy G, Kerry JP (2018) Application of response surface methodology for the development of sensory-acceptable, low-salt, shelf-stable frankfurters using high pressure processing and a mix of organic acids. European Food Research and Technology (accepted)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’ Neill CM, Cruz-Romero MC, Duffy G, Kerry JP (2018) The application of response surface methodology for the development of sensory accepted low-salt cooked ham using high pressure processing and a mix of organic acids. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 45:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Neill CM, Cruz-Romero MC, Duffy G, Kerry JP (2018) Extending the shelf life of vacuum-packed salt reduced frankfurters and cooked ham by the application of hurdle technology. Food Packag Shelf Life 17:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guàrdia M, Guerrero L, Gelabert J, Gou P, Arnau J (2008) Sensory characterisation and consumer acceptability of small calibre fermented sausages with 50% substitution of NaCl by mixtures of KCl and potassium lactate. Meat Sci 80:1225–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skogsberg L (2017) Sodium reduction in emulsion-type sausage. Master´s thesis. Advanced A2E Publikation/Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, vol 455. Institutionen för livsmedelsvetenskapGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alino M, Grau R, Toldra F, Blesa E, Pagan MJ, Barat JM (2009) Influence of sodium replacement on physicochemical properties of dry-cured loin. Meat Sci 83:423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dos Santos BA, Campagnol PCB, Morgano MA, Pollonio MAR (2014) Monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate, lysine and taurine improve the sensory quality of fermented cooked sausages with 50% and 75% replacement of NaCl with KCl. Meat Sci 96:509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fellendorf S, O’sullivan MG, Kerry JP (2016) Impact of ingredient replacers on the physicochemical properties and sensory quality of reduced salt and fat black puddings. Meat Sci 113:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tobin BD, O’sullivan MG, Hamill RM, Kerry JP (2012) Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory and physiochemical quality of frankfurters. Meat Sci 92:659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dimitrakopoulou MA, Ambrosiadis JA, Zetou FK, Bloukas JG (2005) Effect of salt and transglutaminase (TG) level and processing conditions on quality characteristics of phosphate-free, cooked, restructured pork shoulder. Meat Sci 70:743–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aaslyng MD, Vestergaard C, Koch AG (2014) The effect of salt reduction on sensory quality and microbial growth in hotdog sausages, bacon, ham and salami. Meat Sci 96:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guàrdia M, Guerrero L, Gelabert J, Gou P, Arnau J (2006) Consumer attitude towards sodium reduction in meat products and acceptability of fermented sausages with reduced sodium content. Meat Sci 73:484–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pietrasik Z, Gaudette NJ (2014) The impact of salt replacers and flavour enhancer on the processing characteristics and consumer acceptance of restructured cooked hams. Meat Sci 96:1165–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pietrasik Z, Gaudette NJ, Johnston SP (2016) The use of high pressure processing to enhance the quality and shelf life of reduced sodium naturally cured restructured cooked hams. Meat Sci 116:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pietrzak D, Fonberg-Broczek M, Mucka A, Windyga B (2007) Effects of high pressure treatment on the quality of cooked pork ham prepared with different levels of curing ingredients. High Press Res 27:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    NIZO (2018) NIZO food research centre, The Netherlands. https://www.nizo.com/juiciness-enhances-salt-perception-meat-products/. Accessed 21 July 2018
  30. 30.
    Desmond E (2006) Reducing salt: a challenge for the meat industry. Meat Sci 74:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    FSA (2017) Salt targets 2017. https://www.food.gov.uk/northern-ireland/nutritionni/salt-ni/salt-targets. Accessed 3 July 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciara M. O’Neill
    • 1
  • Malco C. Cruz-Romero
    • 1
  • Geraldine Duffy
    • 2
  • Joe P. Kerry
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Food Packaging Group, School of Food and Nutritional SciencesUniversity College Cork (UCC)CorkIreland
  2. 2.Teagasc Food Research CentreDublin 15Ireland

Personalised recommendations