Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 245, Issue 2, pp 273–284 | Cite as

Ham processing: effects of tumbling, cooking and high pressure on proteins

  • Anja Rakotondramavo
  • Hanitra Rabesona
  • Christian Brou
  • Marie de LamballerieEmail author
  • Laurence Pottier
Original Paper
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Meat is recognized as an important source of protein and amino acids. Before consumption, meat products are transformed, and processing modifies the protein characteristics and impacts their digestibility. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of physicochemical modifications (solubility, oxidation, and denaturation) on the degree of in vitro digestibility and the digestion rate of high-pressure-treated cooked ham during the different process steps (curing, cooking and high-pressure treatment). Samples were homogenized and digested by pepsin and then by trypsin. The curing step increased the degree of proteolysis and the digestion rate compared with those of raw meat. Brining and tumbling caused partial denaturation of the proteins, which provided digestive enzymes better access to their specific cleavage sites. Otherwise, the substantial denaturation and protein oxidation induced by the cooking step decreased the degree of digestibility and significantly increased the digestion rate of cooked ham. Finally, the high-pressure treatment decreased the digestibility of cooked ham and simultaneously increased its digestion rate. The denaturation and oxidation phenomena leading to protein aggregation thus masked the cleavage sites necessary for the digestive enzymes. Therefore, each step of the processing of high-pressure cooked ham had an impact on the protein digestion parameters: the curing step promoted the digestibility and proteolysis rate of pork protein, while cooking and high-pressure treatment reduced the digestibility and proteolysis rate of pork protein.

Keywords

Protein Digestibility Oxidation Ham processing Meat 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the French National Research Agency (ANR) for its financial support in the framework of the BLac-HP project (ANR-14-CE20-0004).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Rémond D, Duchène C (2014) Qualité nutritionnelle des protéines de la viande. CIVGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood JD (2017) In: Toldra F (ed) Lawrie’s meat science. 8th edn. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santé-Lhoutellier V, Astruc T, Daudin JD, Kondjoyan A, Scislowski V, Gaudichon C, Rémond D (2013) Influence des modes de cuisson sur la digestion des protéines: approches in vitro et in vivo. Innov Agron 33:69–79Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garriga M, Grèbol N, Aymerich MT, Monfort JM, Hugas M (2004) Microbial inactivation after high-pressure processing at 600 MPa in commercial meat products over its shelf life. Innov Food Sci Emerg 5:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santé-Lhoutellier V, Astruc T, Marinova P, Greve E, Gatellier P (2008) Effect of meat cooking on physicochemical state and in vitro digestibility of myofibrillar proteins. J Agr Food Chem 56:1488–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutherfurd SM, Moughan PJ (2012) Available versus digestible dietary amino acids. Brit J Nutr 108:S298–S305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moughan PJ, Rutherfurd SM (1996) A new method for determining digestible reactive lysine in foods. J Agr Food Chem 44:2202–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Batterham ES (1992) Availability and utilization of amino acids for growing pigs. Nutr Res Rev 5:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vuorela S, Salminen H, Mäkelä M, Kivikari R, Karonen M, Heinonen M (2005) Effect of plant phenolics on protein and lipid oxidation in cooked pork meat patties. J Agr Food Chem 53:8492–8497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Estévez M, Cava R (2004) Lipid and protein oxidation, release of iron from heme molecule and colour deterioration during refrigerated storage of liver pâté. Meat Sci 68:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiong YL (2000) In: Decker EA, Faustman C, Lopez-Bote C (eds) Antioxidants in muscle foods: nutritional strategies to improve quality. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jongberg S, Lund MN, Skibsted LH, María Pastore G, Candoğan K, Medina Meza IG (2017) Caetano da Silva. In: Lannes S, Buckel K, Yada RY, Rosenthal A (eds) Global food security and wellness Barbosa-Cánovas GV. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lund MN, Heinonen M, Baron CP, Estévez M (2011) Protein oxidation in muscle foods: A review. Mol Nutr Food Res 55:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Promeyrat A, Le Louët L, Kondjoyan A, Astruc T, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Gatellier P, Daudin JD (2011) Combined effect of meat composition and heating parameters on the physicochemical state of proteins. Proc Food Sci 1:1118–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Traore S, Aubry L, Gatellier P, Przybylski W, Jaworska D, Kajak-Siemaszko K, Santé-Lhoutellier V (2012) Effect of heat treatment on protein oxidation in pig meat. Meat Sci 91:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bax ML, Aubry L, Ferreira C, Daudin JD, Gatellier P, Rémond D, Santé-Lhoutellier V (2012) Cooking temperature is a key determinant of in vitro meat protein digestion rate: investigation of underlying mechanisms. J Agr Food Chem 60:2569–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sante-Lhoutellier V, Aubry L, Gatellier P (2007) Effect of oxidation on in vitro digestibility of skeletal muscle myofibrillar proteins. J Agr Food Chem 55:5343–5348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bax ML, Buffière C, Hafnaoui N, Gaudichon C, Savary-Azeloux I, Dardevet D, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Rémond D, Blachier F (2013) Effects of meat cooking, and of ingested amount, on protein digestion speed and entry of residual proteins into the colon: a study in minipigs. PLoS One 8:e61252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sazonova S, Galoburda R, Gramatina I (2017) Application of high-pressure processing for safety and shelf-life quality of meat—a review. In: 11th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology “FOODBALT 2017”. Latvia.  https://doi.org/10.22616/FoodBalt.2017.001
  20. 20.
    Cheftel JC, Culioli J (1997) Effect of High pressure on meat: a review. Meat Sci 46(3):211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Messens W, Van Camp J, Huyghebaert A (1997) The use of high pressure to modify the functionality of food proteins. Trends Food Sci Tech 8:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benet I, Guàrdia MD, Ibañez C et al (2016) Low intramuscular fat (but high in PUFA) content in cooked cured pork ham decreased Maillard reaction volatiles and pleasing aroma attributes. Food Chem 196:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas C, Mercier F, Tournayre P, Martin JC, Berdagué JL (2013) Effect of nitrite on the odourant volatile fraction of cooked ham. Food Chem 139:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vossen E, De Smet S (2015) Protein oxidation and protein nitration influenced by sodium nitrite in two different meat model systems. J Agr Food Chem 63:2550–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reactionGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Villamonte G, Simonin H, Duranton F, Chéret R, de Lamballerie M (2013) Functionality of pork meat proteins: Impact of sodium chloride and phosphates under high-pressure processing. Innov Food Sci Emerg 18:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levine RL, Williams JA, Stadtman ER, Shacter E (1994) Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol 233:346–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guyon C, Le Vessel V, Meynier A, de Lamballerie M (2018) Modifications of protein-related compounds of beef minced meat treated by high pressure. Meat Sci 142:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gatellier P, Santé-Lhoutellier V (2009) Digestion study of proteins from cooked meat using an enzymatic microreactor. Meat Sci 81:405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hultin HO, Feng Y, Stanley DW (1995) A re-examination of muscle protein solubility. J Muscle Foods 6:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fischer C, Hamm R, Honikel KO (1979) Changes in solubility and enzymic activity of muscle glycogen phosphorylase in PSE-muscles. Meat Sci 3:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li C, Szczepaniak S, Steen L, Goemaere O, Impens S, Paelinck H, Zhou G (2011) Effect of tumbling time and cooking temperature on quality attributes of cooked ham: Processing condition of cooked ham. Int J Food Sci Tech 46:2159–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Casiraghi E, Alamprese C, Pompei C (2007) Cooked ham classification on the basis of brine injection level and pork breeding country. LWT Food Sci Technol 40:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pioselli B, Paredi G, Mozzarelli A (2011) Proteomic analysis of pork meat in the production of cooked ham. Mol Biosyst 7:2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Z, Xu W, Kang N, Shen O, Zhang D (2016) Microstructural, protein denaturation and water holding properties of lamb under pulse vacuum brining. Meat Sci 113:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Núñez-Flores R, Cando D, Borderías AJ, Moreno HM (2018) Importance of salt and temperature in myosin polymerization during surimi gelation. Food Chem 239:1226–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Von Hippel PH, Wong KY (1965) On the conformational stability of globular proteins. The effects of various electrolytes and nonelectrolytes on the thermal ribonuclease transition. J Biol Chem 240(10):3909–3923Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tornberg E (2005) Effects of heat on meat proteins—implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci 70:493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gravelle AJ, Marangoni AG, Barbut S (2016) Insight into the mechanism of myofibrillar protein gel stability: Influencing texture and microstructure using a model hydrophilic filler. Food Hydrocolloid 60:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen X, Xu X, Liu D, Zhou G, Han M, Wang P (2018) Rheological behavior, conformational changes and interactions of water-soluble myofibrillar protein during heating. Food Hydrocolloid 77:524–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Estévez M (2011) Protein carbonyls in meat systems: a review. Meat Sci 89:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Villaverde A, Ventanas J, Estévez M (2014) Nitrite promotes protein carbonylation and Strecker aldehyde formation in experimental fermented sausages: are both events connected? Meat Sci 98:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Soladoye OP, Juárez ML, Aalhus JL, Sand P, Estévez M (2015) Protein oxidation in processed meat: mechanisms and potential implications on human health: protein oxidation, nutrition, and health. Compr Rev Food Sci F 14:106–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Soyer A, Özalp B, Dalmış Ü, Bilgin V (2010) Effects of freezing temperature and duration of frozen storage on lipid and protein oxidation in chicken meat. Food Chem 120:1025–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pighin DG, Sancho AM, Gonzalez CB (2008) Effect of salt addition on the thermal behavior of proteins of bovine meat from Argentina. Meat Sci 79:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Santé-Lhoutellier V, Astruc T, Daudin JD, Kondjoyan A, Scislowski V, Duchène C, Gaudichon C, Rémond D (2017) Digestion des protéines des viandes en fonction de la cuisson. Viande et produits carnés VPC2017 33(3):3Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rysman T, Van Hecke T, Van Poucke C, De Smet F, Van Royen G (2016) Protein oxidation and proteolysis during storage and in vitro digestion of pork and beef patties. Food Chem 209:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Rakotondramavo
    • 1
  • Hanitra Rabesona
    • 2
  • Christian Brou
    • 1
  • Marie de Lamballerie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laurence Pottier
    • 1
  1. 1.ONIRIS, Food Process Engineering, UMR CNRS 6144 GEPEA, CS 82225Nantes Cedex 03France
  2. 2.UR 1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, INRANantes Cedex 03France

Personalised recommendations