Genetic and epigenetic characterization of the cry1Ab coding region and its 3′ flanking genomic region in MON810 maize using next-generation sequencing
- 43 Downloads
MON810 maize was first commercialized in 1997 and it is one of the most marketed genetically modified crops worldwide. Although MON810 maize has been studied extensively, its genetic stability and epigenetics have not been studied very well. We used next-generation sequencing to investigate the genetics and epigenetics of the cry1Ab coding region and its 3′ flanking genomic region in three different MON810 maize varieties. Genetic characterization of the cry1Ab coding region allowed us to identify and quantify several sequence variants. Samples from seeds containing a stacked MON810 event had more variants than MON810 single event varieties. Specifically, position 71 of the analyzed region varied in 15 of 600 samples tested and thus appears to be a mutational hotspot. In addition, position 71 varied at very different frequencies in the samples. Epigenetic analysis revealed a low degree of methylation, making it difficult to associate the coding region variants with methylation status. In conclusion, the variation in the coding region is either due to the increased age of the seeds from the tested maize varieties, which is known to increase the mutation rate, or due to the presence of a second (non-functional) cry1Ab fragment in the genome of the MON810 maize variety.
KeywordsGenetic stability GMO MON810 Amplicon sequencing SNP Bt maize Methylation Bisulfite sequencing
We would like to express our gratitude to all three anonymous reviewers for their helpful and detailed comments. Material costs for this work were partially supported by the Hochschuljubiläumsstiftung (HJST) of the city of Vienna.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no competing interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
- 1.ISAAA (2016) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016. ISAAA. http://www.isaaa.org/purchasepublications/itemdescription.asp?ItemType=BRIEFS&Control=IB052-2016. Accessed 26 Sept 2017
- 2.Monsanto (2017) Safety Assessment of YieldGard Insect-Protected Corn Event MON 810. Monsanto, https://monsanto.com/company/media/statements/mon810-bans/. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
- 4.Armstrong CL, Green CE, Phillips RL (1991) Development and availability of germplasm with high Type II culture formation response. Maize Genet Cooper Newsl 65:92–93Google Scholar
- 7.Yin Z, Plader W, Malepszy S (2004) Transgene inheritance in plants. J Appl Genet 45(2):127–144Google Scholar
- 8.Kohli A, Griffiths S, Palacios N, Twyman RM, Vain P, Laurie DA, Christou P (1999) Molecular characterization of transforming plasmid rearrangements in transgenic rice reveals a recombination hotspot in the CaMV 35S promoter and confirms the predominance of microhomology mediated recombination. Plant J Cell Mol Biol 17(6):591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Schnell J, Steele M, Bean J, Neuspiel M, Girard C, Dormann N, Pearson C, Savoie A, Bourbonnière L, Macdonald P (2015) A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments. Transgenic Res 24(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9843-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Aguilera M, Querci M, Pastor S, Bellocchi G, Milcamps A, Van den Eede G (2009) Assessing copy number of MON 810 integrations in commercial seed maize varieties by 5′ event-specific real-time PCR validated method coupled to 2-∆∆CT analysis. Food Anal Methods 2(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-008-9036-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Guttikonda SK, Marri P, Mammadov J, Ye L, Soe K, Richey K, Cruse J, Zhuang M, Gao Z, Evans C, Rounsley S, Kumpatla SP (2016) Molecular characterization of transgenic events using next generation sequencing approach. PLoS One 11(2):e0149515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ben Ali SE, Madi ZE, Hochegger R, Quist D, Prewein B, Haslberger AG, Brandes C (2014) Mutation scanning in a single and a stacked genetically modified (GM) event by real-time PCR and high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. Int J Mol Sci 15(11):19898–19923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151119898 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Illumina (2015) Highly targeted resequencing of regions of interest. https://www.illumina.com/techniques/sequencing/dna-sequencing/targeted-resequencing/amplicon-sequencing.html. Accessed 20 Jul 2017
- 22.ThermoFisherScientific Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer. https://www.thermofisher.com/at/en/home/industrial/spectroscopy-elemental-isotope-analysis/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorometers/qubit/qubit-fluorometer.html. Accessed 22 Jun 2017
- 23.Liu N, Chen H (2010) An accurate and rapid PCR-based zygosity testing method for genetically modified maize. Mol Plant Breed 7(3):619–623Google Scholar
- 26.Castan M, Ben Ali S-E, Hochegger R, Ruppitsch W, Haslberger AG, Brandes C (2017) Analysis of the genetic stability of event NK603 in stacked corn varieties using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis and Sanger sequencing. Eur Food Res Technol 243(3):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2749-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Illumina (2013) 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation. https://support.illumina.com/downloads/16s_metagenomic_sequencing_library_preparation.html. Accessed 22 Jun 2017
- 28.Illumina (2016) Illumina adapter sequences. https://support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/experiment-design/illumina-adapter-sequences_1000000002694-01.pdf. Accessed 28 Jul 2017
- 31.Griffiths A, Gelbart W, Miller J (1999) Modern genetic analysis. W. H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 32.Zhang D, Corlet A, Fouilloux S (2008) Impact of genetic structures on haploid genome-based quantification of genetically modified DNA: theoretical considerations, experimental data in MON 810 maize kernels (Zea mays L.) and some practical applications. Transgenic Res 17(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-007-9114-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.van der Salm T, Bosch D, Honée G, Feng L, Munsterman E, Bakker P, Stiekema WJ, Visser B (1994) Insect resistance of transgenic plants that express modified Bacillus thuringiensis cryIA(b) and cryIC genes: a resistance management strategy. Plant Mol Biol 26(1):51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00039519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar