In vitro characterization of antibacterial potential of Iranian honey samples against wound bacteria
- 303 Downloads
Incidence of multidrug-resistant pathogens is increasing, thus discovery of alternative therapeutic agents is needed. Honey possesses therapeutic potential, including wound-healing properties and antimicrobial activities. Although antimicrobial activity of honey has been effectively established, the antibacterial properties of Iranian honey samples on wound microorganisms have not been conducted and compared with honey gold standards. Using standard methods, the antibacterial activities of 53 Iranian honey samples and two laboratory-synthesized honeys against 16 drug-resistant clinical isolates and four reference strains were determined. Different concentrations of honey were tested against each type of microorganism to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or minimum bactericidal concentration. The selected honeys with high levels of phenolic equivalent were studied for kinetics of bacterial killing. Also, the ability of selected honey samples to prevent biofilm formation was checked by crystal violet assay. The MICs of Iranian honey samples ranged from 3.12 to >50 % (w/v), and their efficacies were also determined. Nine samples with the highest antibacterial activities were selected. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reduced significantly by selected honeys. Moreover, all selected honey samples were able to prevent biofilm formation of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa strains at concentrations of ≤25 %. The results of the present study have shown that selected Iranian honey samples had lower MIC values than reported standard honeys such as Manuka and Tualang and could be potentially used as alternative medical grade honey, particularly against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli.
KeywordsAntibacterial properties Efficacy Honey Wound infections
The financial supports of the University of Tehran and Iran National Science foundation (INSF) are gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
- 1.Sherlock O, Dolan A, Athman R, Power A, Gethin G, Cowman S, Humphreys H (2010) Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Ulmo honey from Chile and Manuka honey against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Complement Altern Med 10:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kwakman P, De Boer L, Ruyter-Spira C, Creemers-Molenaar T, Helsper J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Zaat S, Te Velde A (2011) Medical-grade honey enriched with antimicrobial peptides has enhanced activity against antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Brady N, Molan P, Bang L (2004) A survey of non-manuka New Zealand honeys for antibacterial and antifungal activities. J Apicult Res 43:47–52Google Scholar
- 22.Molan P, Russell K (1988) Non-peroxide antibacterial activity in some New Zealand honeys. J Apicult Res 27:62–67Google Scholar
- 24.Helrich K (1990) Official methods of analysis of the AOAC, vol 2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc., WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bogdanov S, Martin P, Lullmann C (2002) Harmonised methods of the international honey commission. International Honey Commission, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 26.Alimentarius C (2001) Codex standard 12. Revised codex standard for honey. Standards and Standard Methods, RomeGoogle Scholar
- 27.Winn WC, Koneman EW (2006) Koneman’s color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- 28.CLSI (2012) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; Approved Standard, CLSI Document M02-A11 (ISBN 1-56238-781-2). Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, WayneGoogle Scholar
- 36.Al-Naama RT (2009) Evaluation of in vitro inhibitory effect of honey on some microbial isolate. J Bacteriol Res 1:064–067Google Scholar
- 41.Temaru E, Shimura S, Amano K, Karasawa T (2007) Antibacterial activity of honey from stingless honeybees (Hymenoptera; Apidae; Meliponinae). Pol J Microbiol 56:281Google Scholar
- 43.Lusby P, Coombes A, Wilkinson J (2002) Honey: a potent agent for wound healing? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 29:295–300Google Scholar