European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 236, Issue 1, pp 135–143 | Cite as

Influence of conching temperature and some bulk sweeteners on physical and rheological properties of prebiotic milk chocolate containing inulin

Original Paper

Abstract

Changes in food consumption habits and the developments set forth in the area of health and nutrition also change consumer expectations and demands. Sugar-free foodstuffs and products that have prebiotic activity are among the primary features of such expectations and demands. In the present study, the effects of substituting fine sugar with isomalt and maltitol in milk chocolate samples that contain inulin (9.0 % w/w), which is a substance with prebiotic activity, and the use of varying conching temperatures (CT) (50, 55 and 60 °C) in the sample preparation process on their physical (colour, hardness, water activity) and rheological properties were examined. Rheological data were obtained using the Herschel–Bulkley model which showed the best fitting for predicting rheology. It was determined that all properties included within the scope of the study are affected by the use of different bulk sweeteners or varying CT (P < 0.01). While colour properties, such as brightness (L*), hue angle (h°), water activity (aw) and rate index properties varied in a narrow range, it was determined that the yield stress and viscosity properties, which are among the important quality parameters of chocolate and can have determining effects on sensory properties, manifest variations within a broad range, depending on the CT and the bulk sweeteners used. It was concluded that maltitol is a more suitable fine sugar substitute in milk chocolates containing inulin.

Keywords

Chocolate Prebiotic Inulin Maltitol Isomalt Conching temperature 

References

  1. 1.
    Jovanovic O, Pajin B (2004) Influence of lactic acid ester on chocolate quality. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M, Vieira J (2008) Particle size distribution and compositional effects on textural properties and appearance of dark chocolates. J Food Eng 87:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M, Vieira J (2008) Effects of tempering and fat crystallisation behaviour on microstructure, mechanical properties and appearance in dark chocolate systems. J Food Eng 89:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Servais C, Ranc H, Roberts ID (2004) Determination of chocolate viscosity. J Texture Stud 34:467–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sokmen A, Gunes G (2006) Influence of some bulk sweeteners on rheological properties of chocolate. LWT-Food Sci Technol 39(10):1053–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tscheuschner HD, Wünsche D (1979) Rheological properties of chocolate masses and the influence of some factors. In: Sherman P (ed) Food texture and rheology. Academic Press, New York, pp 355–368Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martinez-Cervera S, Salvador A, Muguerza B, Moulay L, Fiszman SM (2011) Cocoa fibre and its application as a fat replacer in chocolate muffins. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forssten SD, Sindelar CW, Ouwehand AC (2011) Probiotics from an industrial perspective. Anaerobe 17:410–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morris C, Morris GA (2012) The effect of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide supplementation on the textural, rheological and sensory properties of bread and their role in weight management: a review. Food Chem 133:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Volpini-Rapina LF, Sokei FR, Conti-Silva AC (2012) Sensory profile and preference mapping of orange cakes with addition of prebiotics inulin and oligofructose. LWT-Food Sci Technol 48:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franck A (2002) Technological functionality of inulin and oligofructose. Br J Nutr 87(Suppl. 2):S287–S291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Castro FP, Cunha TM, Barreto PLM, Amboni RDDM, Prudencio ES (2009) Effect of oligofructose incorporation on the properties of fermented probiotic lactic beverages. Int J Dairy Technol 62:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Villegas B, Tarrega A, Carbonell I, Costell E (2010) Optimising acceptability of new prebiotic low-fat milk beverages. Food Qual Prefer 21:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Y (2009) Prebiotics: present and future in food science and technology. Food Res Int 42:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberfroid MB (1999) Concepts in functional foods: the case of inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129:1398S–1401SGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeffrey MS (1993) Key functional properties of sucrose in chocolate and sugar confectionary. Food Technology 47(1):141–144Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abbasi S, Farzanmehr H (2009) Optimization of the formulation prebiotic milk chocolate based on rheological properties. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:396–403Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farzanmehr H, Abbasi S (2009) Effects of inulin and bulking agents on some physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of milk chocolate. J Texture Stud 40:536–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M (2008) Effects of particle size distribution and composition on rheological properties of dark chocolate. Eur Food Res Technol 226:1259–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beckett ST (1999) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 3rd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ziegler G, Hogg R (1999) In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 182–199Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wei ST, Ou LC, Luo MR, Hutchings JB (2012) Optimization of food expectations using product colour and appearance. Food Qual Prefer 23:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aguilera JM, Michel M, Mayor G (2004) Fat migration in chocolate. Diffusion or capillary flow in particulate solid? A hypothesis paper. J Food Sci 69(7):R167–R174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mexis SF, Badeka AV, Riganakos KA, Kontominas MG (2010) Effect of active and modified atmosphere packaging on quality retention of dark chocolate with hazelnuts. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 11:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bolenz S, Amtsberg K, Schape R (2006) The broader usage of sugars and fillers in milk chocolate made possible by the new EC cocoa directive. Int J Food Sci Technol 41:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Clerq N, Moens K, Depypere F, Ayala JV, Calliauw G, De Greyt W, Dewettinck K (2012) Influence of cocoa butter refining on the quality of milk chocolate. J Food Eng 111(2):412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kieran Keogh M, Murray CA, O’Kennedy BT (2003) Effects of selected properties of ultrafiltered spray-dried milk powders on some properties oc chocolate. Int Dairy J 13:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aidoo H, Sakyi-Dawson E, Abbey L, Tano-Debrah K, Saalia FK (2011) Optimisation of chocolate formulation using dehydrated peanut–cowpea milk to replace dairy milk. J Sci Food Agric 92(2):224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Biquet B, Labuza TP (1988) Evaluation of the moisture permeability characteristics of the chocolate films as an edible moisture barrier. J Food Sci 53(4):989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rossini K, Norena CPZ, Brandelli A (2011) Changes in the colour of white chocolate during storage: potential roles of lipid oxidation and non-enzymatic browning reactions. J Food Sci Technol 48(3):305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vercet A (2003) Browning of white chocolate during storage. Food Chem 81(3):371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gloria H, Sievert D (2001) Changes in the physical state of sucrose during dark chocolate processing. J Agric Food Chem 49(5):2433–3436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gonçalves EV, Lannes SCS (2010) Chocolate rheology. Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos 30(4):845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    International Confectionary Association (ICA) (2000) Viscosity of cocoa and chocolate products. Anal Method 46Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aeschlimann JM, Beckett ST (2000) International inter-laboratory trials to determine the factors affecting the measurement of chocolate viscosity. J Texture Stud 31:541–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bouzas J, Brown BD (1995) Interactions affecting microstructure, texture and rheology of chocolate confectionary products. In: Goankar AG (ed) Ingredient interactions: effects on food quality, 1st edn. Marcel Dekker Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shah AB, Jones GP, Vasiljevic T (2010) Sucrose-free chocolate sweetned with Stevia rebaudiana extract and containing different bulking agents- effects on physicochemical and sensory properties. Int J Food Sci Technol 45:1426–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lucisano M, Casiraghi E, Mariotti M (2006) Influence of formulation and processing variables on ball mill refining of milk chocolate. Eur Food Res Technol 223:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nebensy E, Zyzelewicz D, Motyl I, Libudzisz Z (2005) Properties of sucrose-free chocolates enriched with viable lactic acid bacteria. Eur Food Res Technol 220:358–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ankara University Food Safety InstituteDiskapi, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations