Proteolytic activities and safety of use of Enterococci strains isolated from traditional Azerbaijani dairy products

  • Aynur Ahmadova
  • Svetoslav Dimov
  • Iskra Ivanova
  • Yvan Choiset
  • Jean-Marc Chobert
  • Akif Kuliev
  • Thomas Haertlé
Original Paper


A collection of 147 isolates obtained from 23 samples of traditional Azerbaijani dairy products was screened for the presence of proteolytic enzymes. Six Enterococcus faecalis strains obtained from three cheese samples have been identified as proteinase-producing strains, according to their ability to hydrolyze caseins. RAPD–PCR profiles of their total DNA showed different patterns for strains isolated from different cheese samples. The proteolytic activities of these strains were studied during their growth in milk and in non-proliferative cells system. Isolated strains were able to hydrolyze αS1-, αS2-, β-caseins and BLG albeit to different extents, at optimal pH in the range 6.0–7.2 and optimal temperature in the range 37–45 °C, depending on the strain. Proteolysis was strongly inhibited in the presence of EDTA—specific inhibitor of metalloproteases—but the presence of other types of proteases cannot be excluded. The potential pathogenicity of the strains was evaluated investigating the presence of the genes coding different virulence factors and their resistance to antibiotics. The obtained results yield new information about technological characteristics and safety of studied Enterococci strains from Azerbaijani artisanal dairy products. Many from the isolated strains contribute certainly to the differences in flavor, texture, and taste of Azerbaijani traditional cheeses and could represent new adjunct cultures for the dairy industry.


Enterococci Proteolysis Safety Cheese 


  1. 1.
    Suzzi G, Caruso M, Gardini F, Lombardi A, Vannini L, Guerzoni ME, Andrighetto C, Lanorte MT (2000) A survey of the Enterococci isolated from an artisanal Italian goat’s cheese (Semicotto caprino). J Appl Microbiol 89:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foulquié-Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, de Vuyst L (2006) The role and application of Enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsakalidou E, Manolopoulou E, Tsilibari V, Georgalaki M, Kalantzopoulos G (1993) Esterolytic activities of Enterococcus durans and Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Greek cheese. Neth Milk Dairy J 47:145–150Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarantinopoulos P, Kalantzopoulos G, Tsakalidou E (2001) Citrate metabolism by Enterococcus faecalis FAIR-E 229. Appl Env Microbiol 67:5482–5487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strompfova V, Laukova A, Ouwehand AC (2004) Selection of Enterococci for potential canine probiotic additives. Veterinary Microbiol 100:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jensen JP, Reinbold GW, Washam CJ, Vedamuthu ER (1975) Role of Enterococci in Cheddar cheese: proteolytic activity and lactic acid development. J Milk Food Techn 38:3–7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wessels D, Joosten PJ, Mostert JF (1990) Technologically important characteristics of Enterococcus isolates from milk and dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 10:349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Psoni L, Kotzamanides C, Andrighetto C, Lombardi A, Tzanetakis N, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki E (2006) Genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity in Enterococcus isolates from Batzos, a raw goat milk cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 109:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veljovic K, Fira D, Terzic-Vidojevic A, Abriouel H, Galvez A, Topisirovic L (2009) Evaluation of antimicrobial and proteolytic activity of Enterococci isolated from fermented products. Eur Food Res Tech 230:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mundy LM, Sahm DF, Gilmore M (2000) Relationships between enterococcal virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein G (2003) Taxonomy, ecology and antibiotic resistance of Enterococci from food and the gastro-intestinal tract. Int J Food Microbiol 88:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pailin T, Kang DH, Schmidt K, Fung DYC (2001) Detection of extracellular bound proteinase in EPS-producing lactic acid bacteria cultures on skim milk agar. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    El-Ghaish S, Dalgalarrondo M, Choiset Y, Sitohy M, Ivanova I, Haertlé T, Chobert J-M (2010) Screening of strains of lactococci isolated from Egyptian dairy products for their proteolytic activity. Food Chem 120:758–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fira D, Kojic M, Banina A, Spasojevic I, Strahinic I, Topisirovic L (2001) Characterization of cell envelope-associated proteinases of thermophilic lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol 90:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schägger H, von Jagow G (1987) Tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Devouge V, Rogniaux H, Nesi N, Tessier D, Guéguen J, Larré C (2007) Differential proteomic analysis of four near-isogenic Brassica napus varieties bred for their erucic acid and glucosinolate contents. J Proteome Res 6:1342–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ong L, Henriksson A, Shah NP (2006) Development of probiotic cheddar cheese containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lb. casei, Lb. paracasei and Bifidobacterium spp. and the influence of these bacteria on proteolytic patterns and production of organic acid. Int Dairy J 16:446–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ke D, Picard FJ, Martineau F, Menard C, Roy PH, Oulette M, Bergeron MG (1999) Development of PCR assay for rapid detection of Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 37:3497–3503Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barbier N, Saulnier P, Chachaty E, Dumontier S, Andremont A (1996) Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing versus pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for epidemiological typing of vancomycin resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 34:1096–1099Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    LS NCC (2004) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, fourteenth informational supplement. M100–S14. NCCLS, WayneGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martin-Hernandez MC, Alting AC, Exterkate FA (1994) Purification and characterization of the mature, membrane-associated cell-envelope proteinase of Lactobacillus helveticus L89. Appl Microbiol Biotechn 40:828–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsakalidou E, Anastasiou R, Vandenberghe I, van Beeumen J, Kalantzopoulos G (1999) Cell-wall-bound proteinase of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis ACA-DC 178: Characterization and specificity for β-casein. Appl Env Microbiol 65:2035–2040Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ben Omar N, Castro A, Lucas R, Abriouel H, Yousif NM, Franz CM, Holzapfel WH, Pérez-Pulido R, Martínez-Cañamero M, Gálvez A (2004) Functional and safety aspects of enterococci isolated from different Spanish foods. Syst Appl Microbiol 27:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barbosa J, Ferreira V, Teixeira P (2009) Antibiotic susceptibility of Enterococci isolated from traditional fermented meat products. Food Microbiol 26:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Semedo T, Almeida Santos M, Martins P, Silva Lopes MF, Figueiredo Marques JJ, Tenreiro R, Barreto Crespo MT (2003) Comparative study using type strains and clinical and food isolates to examine haemolytic activity and occurrence of the cyl operon in Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 41:2569–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fortina MG, Ricci G, Borgo F, Manachini PL, Arends K, Schiwon K, Abajy MY, Grohmann E (2008) A survey on biotechnological potential and safety of the novel Enterococcus species of dairy origin, E. italicus. Int J Food Microbiol 123:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martín-Platero AM, Valdivia E, Maqueda M, Martínez-Bueno M (2009) Characterization and safety evaluation of Enterococci isolated from Spanish goats’ milk cheeses. Int J Food Microbiol 132:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE (2001) Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol 183:3372–3382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eaton TJ, Gasson MJ (2001) Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl Env Microbiol 67:1628–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakayama J, Kariyama R, Kumon H (2002) Description of a 23.9-kilobase chromosomal deletion containing a region encoding fsr genes which mainly determines the gelatinase-negative phenotype of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis in urine. Appl Env Microbiol 68:3152–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vankerckhoven V, van Autgaerden T, Vael C, Lammens C, Chapelle S, Rossi R, Jabes D, Goznes H (2004) Development of a multiplex PCR for the detection of asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl genes in Enterococci and survey for virulence determinants among European hospital isolates of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 42:4473–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aynur Ahmadova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Svetoslav Dimov
    • 3
  • Iskra Ivanova
    • 4
  • Yvan Choiset
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Chobert
    • 1
  • Akif Kuliev
    • 2
  • Thomas Haertlé
    • 1
  1. 1.UR 1268, INRA Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, Equipe Fonctions et Interactions des ProtéinesNantes Cedex 03France
  2. 2.Biochemistry and Biotechnology Chair, Baku State UniversityBakuAzerbaijan
  3. 3.Department of Genetics, Faculty of BiologySofia University ‘St. Kliment Ohridski’SofiaBulgaria
  4. 4.Department of General and Applied Microbiology, Faculty of BiologySofia University ‘St. Kliment Ohridski’SofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations