European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 232, Issue 2, pp 191–204

Protein changes during malting and brewing with focus on haze and foam formation: a review

Review Paper

Abstract

Beer is a complex mixture of over 450 constituents and, in addition, it contains macromolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, and lipids. In beer, several different protein groups, originating from barley, barley malt, and yeast, are known to influence beer quality. Some of them play a role in foam formation and mouthfeel, and others are known to form haze and have to be precipitated to guarantee haze stability, since turbidity gives a first visual impression of the quality of beer to the consumer. These proteins are derived from the malt used and are influenced, modified, and aggregated throughout the whole malting and brewing process. During malting, barley storage proteins are partially degraded by proteinases into amino acids and peptides that are critical for obtaining high-quality malt and therefore high-quality wort and beer. During mashing, proteins are solubilized and transferred into the produced wort. Throughout wort boiling proteins are glycated and coagulated being possible to separate those coagulated proteins from the wort as hot trub. In fermentation and maturation process, proteins aggregate as well, because of low pH, and can be separated. The understanding of beer protein also requires knowledge about the barley cultivar characteristics on barley/malt proteins, hordeins, protein Z, and LTP1. This review summarizes the protein composition and functions and the changes of malt proteins in beer during the malting and brewing process. Also methods for protein identification are described.

Keywords

Proteins Barley Malt Beer Haze formation Foam formation 

References

  1. 1.
    Kunze W (2007) Technologie Brauer und Mälzer, vol 9. VLB BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Narziß L et al (1999) Die Technologie der Malzbereitung, Die Bierbrauerei. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Celus I et al (2006) The effects of malting and mashing on barley protein extractability. J Cereal Sci 44(2):203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finnie C, Svensson B (2003) Feasibility study of a tissue-specific approach to barley proteome analysis: aleurone layer, endosperm, embryo and single seeds. J Cereal Sci 38(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finnie C, Svensson B (2009) Barley seed proteomics from spots to structures. J Proteomics 72(3):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones BL et al (2000) Quantitative study of the formation of endoproteolytic activities during malting and their stabilities to kilning. J Agric Food Chem 48(9):3898–3905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Narziß L (2005) Abriss der Bierbrauerei, vol 7. Wiley VCHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osman AM et al (2002) Characterisation and assessment of the role of barley malt endoproteases during malting and mashing. J Inst Brew 108(1):62–67Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sørensen S et al (1987) Primary structure of carboxypeptidase II from malted barley. Carlsberg Res Commun 52(4):285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikola L (1983) Germinating barley grains contain five acid carboxypeptidases with complementary substrate specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 747(3):241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sørensen S et al (1986) Primary structure of carboxypeptidase I from malted barley. Carlsberg Res Commun 51(7):475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sørensen S et al (1989) Primary structure of carboxypeptidase III from malted barley. Carlsberg Res Commun 54(5):193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones BL, Marinac L (2002) The effect of mashing on malt endoproteolytic activities. J Agric Food Chem 50(4):858–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones BL (1997) Malt endoproteinases; their synthesis and inactivation during malting and mashing. Eur Symp Enzymes Grain Process Proc 1:54–64Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones BL (2005) The endogenous endoprotease inhibitors of barley and malt and their roles in malting and brewing. J Cereal Sci 42(3):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones BL (2008) The endoproteinases of barley and malt and their endogenous inhibitors. Tech Q MBAA Commun 45(3):279–282Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones BL, Budde AD (1999) Endoproteinases and the hydrolysis of malt proteins during mashing. Proc Congr Eur Brew Conv 27:611–618Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osman AM (2003) Barley and malt proteins and proteinases: II. The purification and characterisation of five malt endoproteases, using the highly degradable barley protein fraction (HDBPF) substrate. J Inst Brew 109(2):142–149Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osman AM (2003) Barley and malt proteins and proteinases: I. Highly degradable barley protein fraction (HDBPF), a suitable substrate for Malt Endoprotease Assay. J Inst Brew 109(2):135–414Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Osman AM (2003) Barley and malt proteins and proteinases: III. A simple method for estimating the combined actions of malt proteinases and the extent of protein degradation during malting. J Inst Brew 109(2):150–153Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones BL (2005) Endoproteases of barley and malt. J Cereal Sci 42(2):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang NY, Jones BL (1995) Characterization of germinated barley endoproteolytic enzymes by 2-dimensional gel-electrophoresis. J Cereal Sci 21(2):145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones BL, Budde AD (2005) How various malt endoproteinase classes affect wort soluble protein levels. J Cereal Sci 41(1):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fontanini D, Jones Berne L (2002) SEP-1–a subtilisin-like serine endopeptidase from germinated seeds of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Morex. Planta 215(6):885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perrocheau L et al (2006) Stability of barley and malt lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP1) toward heating and reducing agents: relationships with the brewing process. J Agric Food Chem 54(8):3108–3113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perrocheau L et al (2005) Probing heat-stable water-soluble proteins from barley to malt and beer. Proteomics 5(11):2849–2858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vaag P, et al. (2000) Protein and cDNA sequences of e1 hordein from barley, wheat, and/or rye, and uses thereof to enhance the quality of foam in beer. Application: WOWO Patent 99-IB15972000014237Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vaag P et al (1999) Characterization of a beer foam protein originating from barley. Proc Congr Eur Brew Conv 27:157–166Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van Nierop SNE et al (2002) Studies on beer foam proteins in a commercial brewing process. Proce Conv Inst Brew (Asia Pacific Section) 27:35–40Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Nierop SNE et al (2004) Impact of different wort boiling temperatures on the beer foam stabilizing properties of lipid transfer protein 1. J Agric Food Chem 52(10):3120–3129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evans DE, et al. (1998) The influence of malt foam-positive proteins and non-starch polysaccharides on beer foam quality. Monogr Eur Brew Conv 27 (E.B.C.-Symp Beer Foam Q, 1998):114–128Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Iimure T et al (2008) Novel prediction method of beer foam stability using protein Z, barley dimeric alpha -amylase inhibitor-1 (BDAI-1) and yeast thioredoxin. J Agric Food Chem 56(18):8664–8671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Osborne TB (1924) Vegetable proteins. 2nd ed. revisedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Osborne TB (1924) Vegetable proteins. Am Food J 19:143Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Osborne TB (1924) Vegetable proteins. Chem Age (London) 10:349Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Osborne TB (1924) Vegetable proteins. Chem Ind 43:440Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Osborne TB, Mendel LB (1924) Continuation and extension of work on vegetable proteins. Exp Stn Rec 53:364Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wieser H et al (1998) Quantitative determination of gluten protein types in wheat flour by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Cereal Chem 75(5):644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Klose C et al (2008) Protein changes during barley malting. Brauwelt 148(36):1044–1045Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bak-Jensen KS et al (2004) Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis pattern (pH 6–11) and identification of water-soluble barley seed and malt proteins by mass spectrometry. Proteomics 4(3):728–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bobalova J et al (2008) Investigation of protein composition of barley by gel electrophoresis and MALDI mass spectrometry with regard to the malting and brewing process. J Inst Brew 114(1):22–26Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Görg A et al (1992) Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, with immobilized pH gradients in the first dimension, of barley seed proteins: discrimination of cultivars with different malting grades. Electrophoresis 13(4):192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Görg A et al (1992) Detection of polypeptides and amylase isoenzyme modifications related to malting quality during malting process of barley by two-dimensional electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 13(9–10):759–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kristoffersen HE, Flengsrud R (2000) Separation and characterization of basic barley seed proteins. Electrophoresis 21(17):3693–3700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ostergaard O et al (2004) Proteome analysis of barley seeds: Identification of major proteins from two-dimensional gels (pI 4–7). Proteomics 4(8):2437–2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ostergaard O et al (2002) Initial proteome analysis of mature barley seeds and malt. Proteomics 2(6):733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Finnie C et al (2006) Differential appearance of isoforms and cultivar variation in protein temporal profiles revealed in the maturing barley grain proteome. Plant Sci (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 170(4):808–821Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Finnie C et al (2004) Aspects of the barley seed proteome during development and germination. Biochem Soc Trans 32(3):517–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Finnie C et al (2002) Proteome analysis of grain filling and seed maturation in barley. Plant Physiol 129(3):1308–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Finnie C et al (2003) Barley proteome analysis, starch degrading enzymes and proteinaceous inhibitors. J Appl Glycosci 50(2):277–282Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Flengsrud R (1993) Separation of acidic barley endosperm proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 14(10):1060–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Flengsrud R, Kobro G (1989) A method for two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins from green plant tissues. Anal Biochem 177(1):33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Metodiev MV et al (2002) Two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of salicylic acid-induced changes in polypeptide pattern of barley leaves. Biol Plant 45(4):585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shewry PR et al (1988) Two-dimensional electrophoresis of cereal prolamins: applications to biochemical and genetic analyses. Electrophoresis 9(11):727–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sorensen SB et al (1993) Barley lipid transfer protein 1 is involved in beer foam formation. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 30(4):136–145Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stanislava G (2007) Barley grain non-specific lipid-transfer proteins (ns-LTPs) in beer production and quality. J Inst Brew 113(3):310–324Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Weiss W et al (1991) Barley cultivar discrimination: I Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and glycoprotein blotting. Electrophoresis 12(5):323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weiss W et al (1991) Barley cultivar discrimination: II Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 12(5):330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Weiss W et al (1992) Qualitative and quantitative changes in barley seed protein patterns during the malting process analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with respect to malting quality. Electrophoresis 13(9–10):787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Görg A et al (1988) Two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients of leaf proteins from barley (Hordeum vulgare): method, reproducibility and genetic aspects. Electrophoresis 9(11):681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Williams KM, Marshall T (1995) Protein composition of beer as revealed by high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal Proc 32(1):25–28Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Asano K, Hashimoto N (1980) Isolation and characterization of foaming proteins of beer. J Am Soc Brew Chem 38(4):129–137Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Asano K et al (1982) Characterization of haze-forming proteins of beer and their roles in chill haze formation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 40(4):147–154Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Iimure T et al (2009) Construction of a novel beer proteome map and its use in beer quality control. Food Chem 118(3):566–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Iimure T et al (2009) Identification of novel haze-active beer proteins by proteome analysis. J Cereal Sci 49(1):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hejgaard J (1977) Origin of a dominant beer protein immunochemical identity with a beta-amylase-associated protein from barley. J Inst Brew 83(2):94–96Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hejgaard J (1982) Purification and properties of protein Z–a major albumin of barley endosperm. Physiol Plant 54:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hejgaard J (1984) Gene products of barley chromosomes 4 and 7 are precursors of the major antigenic beer protein. J Inst Brew 90(2):85–87Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hejgaard J, Bjoern SE (1985) Four major basic proteins of barley grain. Purification and partial characterization. Physiol Plant 64(3):301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hejgaard J, Boeg-Hansen TC (1974) Quantitative immunoelectrophoresis of barley and malt proteins. J Inst Brew London 80(5):436–442Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hejgaard J, Carlsen S (1977) Immunoelectrophoretic identification of a heterodimer beta -amylase in extracts of barley grain. J Sci Food Agric 28(10):900–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hejgaard J, Gibbons GC (1979) Screening for a alpha -amylase in cereals. Improved gel-diffusion assay using a dye-labeled starch substrate. Carlsberg Res Commun 44(1):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hejgaard J, Soerensen SB (1975) Characterization of a protein-rich beer fraction by two-dimensional immunoelectrophoretic techniques. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg 40(16):187–203Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Shewry PR (1993) Barley seed proteins. Barley, pp 131–97Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shewry PR et al (1978) Comparison of methods for extraction and separation of hordein fractions from 29 barley varieties. J Sci Food Agric 29(5):433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Shewry PR, Miflin BJ (1983) Characterization and synthesis of barley seed proteins. Seed Proteins, pp 143–205Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Shewry PR, Miflin BJ (1985) Seed storage proteins of economically important cereals. Adv Cereal Sci Technol 7:1–83Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shewry PR et al (1978) Varietal identification of single seeds of barley by analysis of hordein polypeptides. J Sci Food Agric 29(7):587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mills ENC et al (1998) Immunological study of hydrophobic polypeptides in beer. J Agric Food Chem 46(11):4475–4483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ishibashi Y et al (1997) Application of ELISA to quantitative evaluation of foam-active protein in the malting and brewing processes. J Am Soc Brew Chem 55(1):20–23Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Briggs D, Hough J (1981) Malting and brewing science: malt and sweet wort. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Michael G et al (1961) Die Eiweißqualität von Körnern verschiedener Getreidearten in Abhängigkeit von Stickstoffversorgung und Entwicklungszustand. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung Düngung Bodenkunde 92(2):106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wilson C et al (1981) The extraction and separation of barley glutelins and their relationship to other endosperm proteins. J Exp Bot 32(6):1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kirkman MA et al (1982) The effect of nitrogen nutrition on the lysine content and protein composition of barley seeds. J Sci Food Agric 33(2):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Faulks AJ et al (1981) The polymorphism and structural homology of storage polypeptides (hordein) coded by the Hor-2 locus in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Biochem Genet 19(910):841–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Miflin BJ, Shewry PR (1981) Seed storage proteins: genetics, synthesis, accumulation and protein quality. Dev Plant Soil Sci 3 (Nitrogen Carbon Metab): 195–248Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rahman S et al (1984) Hordein-gene expression during development of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) endosperm. Biochem J 223(2):315–322Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Festenstein GN et al (1984) Immunochemical studies on barley seed storage proteins The specificity of an antibody to “C” hordein and its reaction with prolamins from other cereals. Planta 162(6):524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Faulks AJ et al (1981) The polymorphism and structural homology of storage polypeptides (hordein) coded by the Hor-2 locus in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Biochem Genet 19(9–10):841–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Melzer J, Kleinhofs A (1987) Molecular genetics of barley endosperm proteins. Barley Genet Newsl 17:13–24Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Silva F et al (2008) Electrophoretic and HPLC methods for comparative study of the protein fractions of malts, worts and beers produced from Scarlett and Prestige barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. Food Chem 106:820–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Baxter ED, Wainwright T (1979) Hordein and malting quality. J Am Soc Brew Chem 37(1):8–12Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Forde BG et al (1985) Short tandem repeats shared by B- and C-hordein cDNAs suggest a common evolutionary origin for two groups of cereal storage protein genes. EMBO J 4(1):9–15Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shewry PR, Miflin BJ (1982) Genes for the storage proteins of barley. Qual Plant Plant Foods Hum Nutr 31(3):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Baxter ED (1981) Hordein in barley and malt–a review. J Inst Brew 87(3):173–176Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Wilson CM et al (1981) The extraction and separation of barley glutelins and their relationship to other endosperm proteins. J Exp Bot 32(131):1287–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Fox GP, Henry RJ (1995) Analysis of water-soluble proteins from barley by ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography. J Inst Brew 101(3):181–185Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Giese H, Hejgaard J (1984) Synthesis of salt-soluble proteins in barley. Pulse-labeling study of grain filling in liquid-cultured detached spikes. Planta 161(2):172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hejgaard J (1976) Free and protein-bound beta -amylases of barley grain. Characterization by two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis. Physiol Plant 38(4):293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hejgaard J, Boisen S (1980) High-lysine proteins in Hiproly barley breeding: identification, nutritional significance and new screening methods. Hereditas (Lund, Swed.) 93(2):311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Rosenkrands I et al (1994) Serpins from wheat grain. FEBS Lett 343(1):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rasmussen SK et al (1991) cDNA cloning, characterization and expression of an endosperm-specific barley peroxidase. Plant Mol Biol 16(2):317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Giese H, Hopp H (1984) Influence of nitrogen nutrition on the amount of hordein, protein Z and -amylase messenger RNA in developing endosperms of barley. Carlsberg Res Commun 49(3):365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Brandt A et al (1990) A plant serpin gene. Structure, organization and expression of the gene encoding barley protein Z4. Eur J Biochem 194(2):499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Rasmussen SK et al (1984) A cDNA clone for protein Z, a major barley endosperm albumin. Carlsberg Res Commun 49(3):385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Doll H (1984) Nutritional aspects of cereal proteins and approaches to overcome their deficiencies. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 304(1120):373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Rasmussen SK (1993) A gene coding for a new plant serpin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1172(1–2):151–154Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Gorjanovic S et al (2007) Antimicrobial activity of malting barley grain thaumatin-like protein isoforms, S and R. J Inst Brew 113(2):206–212Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Bobalova J et al (2010) Monitoring of malting process by characterization of glycation of barley protein Z. Eur Food Res Technol 230(4):665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Heinemann B et al (1996) Structure in solution of a four-helix lipid binding protein. Protein Sci 5(1):13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Bakan B et al (2009) The crystal structure of oxylipin-conjugated barley LTP1 highlights the unique plasticity of the hydrophobic cavity of these plant lipid-binding proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 390(3):780–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Jegou S et al (2000) Purification and structural characterization of LTP1 polypeptides from beer. J Agric Food Chem 48(10):5023–5029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Douliez JP et al (2000) Structure, biological, and technological functions of lipid transfer proteins and indolines, the major lipid binding proteins from cereal kernels. J Cereal Sci 32(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Gorjanovic S et al (2005) Malting barley grain non-specific lipid-transfer protein (ns-LTP): importance for grain protection. J Inst Brew 111(2):99–104Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Jones BL, Marinac LA (1995) Barley LTP1 (PAPI) and LTP2: inhibitors of green malt cysteine endoproteinases. J Am Soc Brew Chem 53(4):194–195Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Evans DE, Hejgaard J (1999) The impact of malt derived proteins on beer foam quality. Part I. The effect of germination and kilning on the level of protein Z4, protein Z7 and LTP1. J Inst Brew 105(3):159–169Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Evans DE et al (1999) The impact of malt derived proteins on beer foam quality Part II: the influence of malt foam-positive proteins and non-starch polysaccharides on beer foam quality. J Inst Brew 105(3):171–177Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kaersgaard P, Hejgaard J (1979) Antigenic beer macromolecules: an experimental survey of purification methods. J Inst Brew 85(2):103–111Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Lundgard R, Svensson B (1989) A 39 kD barley seed protein of the serpin superfamily inhibits alpha-chymotrypsin. Carlsberg Res Commun 54(5):173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Jones BL, Marinac LA (1997) Purification, identification, and partial characterization of a barley protein that inhibits green malt endoproteinases. J Am Soc Brew Chem 55(2):58–64Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Steiner E, Back W (2009) A critical review of protein assays and further aspects of new methods in brewingscience. Brew Sci 62:90–94Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Slack PT et al (1979) Inhibition by hordein of starch degradation. J Inst Brew 85(2):112–114Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Osman AM et al (2003) The gel filtration chromatographic-profiles of proteins and peptides of wort and beer: effects of processing–malting, mashing, kettle boiling, fermentation and filtering. J Inst Brew 109(1):41–50Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Bamforth CW (1999) Beer haze. J Am Soc Brew Chem 57(3):81–90Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Curioni A et al (1995) Major proteins of beer and their precursors in barley: electrophoretic and immunological studies. J Agric Food Chem 43(10):2620–2626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Hejgaard J, Kaersgaard P (1983) Purification and properties of the major antigenic beer protein of barley origin. J Inst Brew 89(6):402–410Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Nadzeyka A et al (1979) The significance of beer proteins in relationship to cold break and age-related haze formation. Brauwissenschaft 32(6):167–172Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Siebert KJ et al (1996) Formation of protein-polyphenol haze in beverages. J Agric Food Chem 44(8):1997–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    von Wettstein D (2007) From analysis of mutants to genetic engineering. Plant Biol 58(1):1Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Leiper KA et al (2003) Beer polypeptides and silica gel. Part II. Polypeptides involved in foam formation. J Inst Brew 109(1):73–79Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Leiper KA et al (2003) Beer polypeptides and silica gel Part I Polypeptides involved in haze formation. J Inst Brew 109(1):57–72Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Loisa M et al (1971) Quantitative determination of some beer protein components by an immunological method. Brauwissenschaft 24(10):366–368Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Bamforth C (2001) A brewer’s biochemistry. Brew Int 1(3):21–25Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Siebert KJ (1999) Protein-polyphenol haze in beverages. Food Technol (Chicago) 53(1):54–57Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Siebert KJ (1999) Effects of protein-polyphenol interactions on beverage haze, stabilization, and analysis. J Agric Food Chem 47(2):353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Djurtoft R (1965) Composition of the protein and polypeptide fraction of EBC beer haze preparations. J Inst Brew 71(4):305–315Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Mussche R (1990) Physico-chemical stabilization of beer using new generation gallotannins. Proc Conv Inst Brew (Aust N Z Sect) 21:136–140Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Outtrup H et al (1987) The interaction between proanthocyanidins and peptides. Proc Congr Eur Brew Conv 21:583–590Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Belleau G, Dadic M (1981) Beer hazes. II. Further analyses of basic components by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Am Soc Brew Chem 39(4):142–146Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Dadic M, Belleau G (1980) Beer hazes. I. Isolation and preliminary analysis of phenolic and carbohydrate components. J Am Soc Brew Chem 38(4):154–158Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Portero-Otin M et al (2003) Protein modification by advanced Maillard adducts can be modulated by dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biochem Soc Trans 31:1403–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Lapolla A et al (1993) The lysine glycation 1 A preliminary investigation on the products arising from the reaction of protected lysine and D-glucose. Amino Acids 5(3):389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Leiper KA et al (2005) Optimising beer stabilisation by the selective removal of tannoids and sensitive proteins. J Inst Brew 111(2):118–127Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Evans DE et al (2003) Application of immunological methods to differentiate between foam-positive and haze-active proteins originating from malt. J Am Soc Brew Chem 61(2):55–62Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Lázaro A et al (1985) Differential effects of high-lysine mutations on the accumulation of individual members of a group of proteins encoded by a disperse multigene family in the endosperm of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Eur J Biochem 149(3):617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Robinson LH et al (2007) The identification of a barley haze active protein that influences beer haze stability: the genetic basis of a barley malt haze active protein. J Cereal Sci 45(3):335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Robinson LH et al (2004) The interaction between malt protein quality and brewing conditions and their impact on beer colloidal stability. Tech Q MBAA Communicator 41(4):353–362Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Evans DE, Sheehan MC (2002) Don’t be fobbed off: the substance of beer foam. J Am Soc Brew Chem 60(2):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kobayashi N et al (2002) A new method for evaluating foam-damaging effect by free fatty acids. J Am Soc Brew Chem 60(1):37–41Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Bech LM et al (1995) Throughout the brewing process barley lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP1) is transformed into a more foam-promoting form. Proc Congr Eur Brew Conv 25:561–568Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Hao J et al (2006) Identification of the major proteins in beer foam by mass spectrometry following sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Am Soc Brew Chem 64(3):166–174Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Onishi A et al (1999) Monoclonal antibody probe for assessing beer foam stabilizing proteins. J Agric Food Chem 47(8):3044–3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Kapp GR, Bamforth CW (2002) The foaming properties of proteins isolated from barley. J Sci Food Agric 82(11):1276–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Lusk L et al. (1998) Foam tower fractionation of beer proteins and bittering acids. Monograph European Brew Conv 27 (E.B.C.-Symp Beer Foam Q, 1998):166–187Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Jin B et al (2009) Structural changes of malt proteins during boiling. Molecules 14(3):1081–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Jin B et al (2009) Proteomics study of silica eluent proteins in beer. J Am Soc Brew Chem 67(4):183–188Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Kordialik-Bogacka E, Ambroziak W (2004) Investigation of foam-active polypeptides during beer fermentation. J Sci Food Agri 84(14):1960–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Kordialik-Bogacka E, Ambroziak W (2006) The relationship between polypeptides and foaming during fermentation. LWT Food Sci Technol 40(2):368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Okada Y et al (2008) The influence of barley malt protein modification on beer foam stability and their relationship to the barley dimeric alpha -amylase inhibitor-I (BDAI-I) as a possible foam-promoting protein. J Agric Food Chem 56(4):1458–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Marshall T, Williams KM (1987) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of the proteins and macromolecular constituents of beer and wine. Electrophoresis 8(10):493–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Hejgaard J (1978) ‘Free’ and ‘bound’ beta -amylases during malting of barley. Characterization by two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis. J Inst Brew 84(1):43–46Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Dahl SW et al (1996) Heterologous expression of three plant serpins with distinct inhibitory specificities. J Biol Chem 271(41):25083–25088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Dahl SW et al (1996) Inhibition of coagulation factors by recombinant barley serpin BSZx. FEBS Lett 394(2):165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Jegou S et al (2001) Evidence of the glycation and denaturation of LTP1 during the malting and brewing process. J Agric Food Chem 49(10):4942–4949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Dale CJ, Young TW (1988) Fractionation of high molecular weight polypeptides from beer using two dimensional gel electrophoresis. J Inst Brew 94(1):28–32Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Esslinger HM (ed) (2009) Handbook of brewing: processes. Technology, MarketsGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Back W (2005) Ausgewählte Kapitel der Brauereitechnologie, vol 1. Fachverlag Hans Carl GmbH, NürnbergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Steiner
    • 1
  • Martina Gastl
    • 1
  • Thomas Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Brau- und GetränketechnologieTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations