Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 227, Issue 1, pp 255–260 | Cite as

Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) as a source of water extractable antioxidant for use in chicken meat

  • Aline M. C. Racanicci
  • Bente Danielsen
  • Leif H. SkibstedEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Aqueous extract of mate, made from dried leaves of Ilex paraguariensis, St. Hilaire, was shown to be effective during chilled storage for up to 10 days in protecting lipids and vitamin E against oxidation in pre-cooked meat balls made from chicken breast added 0.5% salt and packed in atmospheric air. Extracts made with water, methanol, ethanol or 70% aqueous acetone were evaluated by comparing (1) total phenolic content, (2) radical scavenging capacity, (3) effect on lipid oxidation in a food emulsion model, and in liposomes. Based on the three-step evaluation, aqueous mate extract was preferred for food use. Dried leaves were further compared to dried rosemary leaves in chicken meat balls, and mate (0.05 and 0.10%) found to yield equal or better protection than rosemary at the same concentration against formation of secondary lipid oxidation products.

Keywords

Mate Antioxidant capacity ESR TBARS Chicken meat stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the ÖFORSK Committee, as part of the research program “FOODANTIOX-New Antioxidant Strategies for Food Quality and Consumer Health.” The authors thank FAPESP (The State of São Paulo Research Foundation) for financial support such as travel and housing grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Nissen LR, Maansson L, Bertelsen G, Huynh-Ba T, Skibsted LH (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:5548–5556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bragagnolo N, Danielsen B, Skibsted LH (2007) Innov Food Sci Technol 8:24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Racanicci AMC, Danielsen B, Menten JFM, Regitano-d´Arce MAB, Skibsted LH (2004) Eur Food Res Technol 218:521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filip R, López P, Giberti G, Coussio J, Ferraro G (2001) Fitoterapia 72:774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker EM, Nissen LR, Skibsted LH (2004) Eur Food Res Technol 219:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amerine MA, Ough CS (1980) In: Wiley J (ed) Methods for analysis of must and wines. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, pp 181–184Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu M, Skibsted LH (2002) Food Chem 76:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roberts WG, Gordon MH (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:1486–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rødtjer A, Skibsted LH, Andersen ML (2006) Food Chem 99:6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Madsen HL, Sørensen B, Skibsted LH, Bertelsen G (1998) Food Chem 63:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen C, Guidera J, Skovgaard IM, Staun H, Skibsted LH, Jensen SK, Møller AJ, Buckley J, Bertelsen G (1997) Meat Sci 55:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Filip R, Ferrato GE (2003) Eur J Nutr 42:50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bragagnolo N, Danielsen B, Skibsted LH (2005) Eur Food Sci Technol 221:610–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aline M. C. Racanicci
    • 1
  • Bente Danielsen
    • 2
  • Leif H. Skibsted
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”—ESALQUniversity of São PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Food Science, Food ChemistryUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark

Personalised recommendations