European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 226, Issue 5, pp 1099–1106 | Cite as

Effects of overprocessing on heat damage of UHT milk

  • Stefano Cattaneo
  • Fabio Masotti
  • Luisa Pellegrino
Original Paper


Formation of lactulose, furosine, galactosyl-|*beta*|-pyranone and lysinoalanine was studied in UHT milk samples produced by either direct or indirect heating on industrial plants and by indirect heating on a pilot plant. In particular, the effects of severe sterilization conditions, different proportions of milk recirculation, and storage of the finished product (23 °C for up to 90 days) have been investigated on the levels of the above molecules in UHT milk. An extensive increase of the values of all the indicators occurred when severe heat process was applied, but no direct relation was found between their levels and the nominal time–temperature conditions. Lactulose and furosine levels confirmed to be strictly correlated in UHT milk. In case of overheating or high proportion (60%) of milk recirculation, galactosyl-|*beta*|-pyranone formation was strongly enhanced, proving that also the advanced Maillard reaction takes place extensively, which is not detected by furosine value. Formation of lysinoalanine in UHT drinking milk on storage was pointed out for the first time. Lysinoalanine proved to be the most sensitive index of storage conditions among the four parameters studied. Data suggest that a realistic defence of UHT milk quality can be achieved only by fixing upper limits to heat damage parameters. Besides avoiding unjustified milk overheating, this approach may allow manipulations, like reprocessing expired milk, to be pointed out.


UHT milk Heat damage Overprocessing Lactulose Furosine Lysinoalanine 



The authors are grateful to Professor Pierpaolo Resmini for encouragement and support.


  1. 1.
    European Commission (2005) Off J Eur Commun L 338:27–59Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EU Commission, Dairy Chemists’ Group (2005) Doc. D(2005)HG/hussevi/chim05/053 Working Paper 04/07/2005 BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claeys WL, Smout C, Van Loey AM, Hendrickx ME (2004) Biotechnol Prog 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU Commission, Dairy Chemists’ Group (1992) Doc. DG VI 5194/92 15/09/1992 BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mortier L, Braekman A, Cartuyvels D, Van Renterghem R, De Block J (2000) Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 4:221–225Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feinberg M, Dupont D, Efstathiou T, Louapre V, Guyonnet JP (2006) Food Chem 98:188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tschumi M, Eberhard P (2002) Contrôle de la qualité du lait UHT suisse de 1985 à 2002.
  8. 8.
    O’Brien J (1995) Heat-induced changes in lactose: isomerization, degradation, Maillard browning. In: Fox PF (ed) Heat induced changes in milk, 2nd edn. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, pp 134–170Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Koning PJ (1984) Voedingsmiddelentechnologie 17:25–27Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrews GR (1984) J Soc Dairy Technol 37:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pellegrino L, Resmini P, Luf W (1995) Assessment (indices) of heat treatment of milk. In: Fox PF (ed) Heat induced changes in milk, 2nd edn. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, pp 409–447Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elliott AJ, Dhakal A, Datta N, Deeth HC (2003) Aust J Dairy Technol 58:3–10Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    German Milk Ordinance (1989) Milchverordnung vom 23-6-1989. BGBL 1 n. 29 vom 28-6-1989 S.1140Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morales FJ, Romero C, Jimenez-Perez S (2000) Int J Food Sci Technol 35:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EU Commission, Dairy Chemists’ Group (1993) Doc. DG VI/4576/93, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlimme E, Buchheim W, Heeschen W (1994) DMZ Lebensm Milchw 115:64–69Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corzo N, Delgado T, Troyano E, Olano A (1994) J Food Prot 57:737–739Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pellegrino L, De Noni I, Resmini P (1995) Int Dairy J 5:647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ledl F (1990) Chemical pathways of the Maillard reaction. In: Finot PA, Aeschbacher HU, Hurrell RF, Liardon R (eds) The Maillard reaction in food processing, human nutrition and physiology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 19–42Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pellegrino L, Cattaneo S (2001) Nahrung 45:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Resmini P, Pellegrino L, Cattaneo S (2003) Ital J Food Sci 15:473–484Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Friedman M (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47(4):1295–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pellegrino L, Resmini P, De Noni I, Masotti F (1996) J Dairy Sci 79:725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D’Agostina A, Boschin G, Rinaldi A, Arnoldi A (2003) Food Chem 80:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faist V, Drusch S, Kiesner C, Elmadfa I, Erbersdobler HF (2000) Int Dairy J 10:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ISO 18329-IDF 193 (2004) Milk and milk products—determination of Furosine content—ion-pair reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography methodGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    International Standard IDF 147B (1998) Heat-treated milk—determination of lactulose content. Method using high-performance liquid chromatography (Reference Method). International Dairy Federation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burton H (1994) Ultra-high-temperature processing of milk and milk products. Blackie, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dairy processing handbook (1995) Tecnotext AB, LundGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cerf O (1982) Rev Lait Fr 405:15–17Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elliott AJ, Datta N, Amenu B, Deeth HC (2005) J Dairy Res 72:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Cattaneo
    • 1
  • Fabio Masotti
    • 1
  • Luisa Pellegrino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologyState University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations