Dietary DNA in blood and organs of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

  • Christer Røss Nielsen
  • Knut G. Berdal
  • Anne Marie Bakke-McKellep
  • Arne Holst-Jensen
Original Paper

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the uptake of dietary DNA into blood, kidney, and liver of salmon, and to determine the DNA fragment size if dietary DNA was detected. Salmon in groups of five fish were force-fed a feed containing a high copy number of three polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified DNA fragments. Tissue samples were dissected from the fish at time intervals starting at 1 h after force-feeding (AFF) and ending at 64 h AFF. Real-time PCR analyses were used to determine the presence or absence of DNA targets. Sensitive methods amplifying small fragments were used to minimise the impact of fragmentation on the detectability of DNA targets. Uptake of dietary DNA was observed and the highest concentrations of dietary DNA in liver and kidney were found 8 h AFF. The results correspond to data published for similar trials performed on other animal species. An additional experiment showed that decontamination of the liver surface by flaming has the potential to decrease DNA contamination from, for example, feed remnants by up to 90%.

Keywords

DNA uptake DNA metabolism Gastrointestinal tract Genetically modified organisms 

References

  1. 1.
    EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Environmental Protection Agency Federal Register 65, October 31:65245–65251Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orlandi PA, Lampel KA, South PK, Assar SA, Carter L, Levy DD (2002) J Food Prot 65:426–431Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holst-Jensen A, Rønning SB, Løvseth A, Berdal KG (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 375:985–993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schubbert R, Renz D, Schmitz B, Doerfler W (1997) PNAS 94:961–966Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doerfler W, Schubbert R (1998) Wien Klin Woechenschr 110:40–44Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schubbert R, Hohlweg U, Renz D, Doerfler W (1998) Mol Gen Genet 259:569–576Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Einspanier R, Klotz A, Kraft J, Aulrich K, Poser R, Schwagele F, Jahreis G, Flachowsky G (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 212:129–134Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reuter T, Aulrich K (2003) Eur Food Res Tech 216:185–192Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tony MA, Butschke A, Broll H, Grohmann L, Zagon J, Halle I, Dãnicke S, Schauzu M, Hafez HM, Flachowsky G (2003) Arch Anim Nutr 57:235–252Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Windels P, Taverniers I, Depicker A, Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 213:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hupfer C, Hotzel H, Sachse K, Engel KH (1998) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 206:203–207Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brodmann PD, Ilg EC, Berthoud H, Herrmann A (2002) J AOAC Int 85:646–653Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berdal KG, Holst-Jensen A (2001) Eur Food Res Tech 213:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    NMKL (2002) Measurement of uncertainty in microbiological examination in foods NMKL-procedure No 8, 2nd Ed 2002Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krogdahl Å, Nordrum S, Sørensen M, Brudeseth L, Røsjø C (1999) Aquaculture Nutrition 5:121–133Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bakke-McKellep AM, Nordrum S, Krogdahl Å, Buddington RK (2000) Fish Physiol Biochem 22:33–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Netherwood T, Martìn-Orùe MS, O’Donell GA, Gockling S, Graham J, Mathers JC, Gilbert JH (2004) Nature Biotechnol 22:204–209Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chowdhury EH, Mikami O, Murata H, Sultana P, Shimada N, Yoshioka M, Guruge KS, Yamamoto S, Miyazaki S, Yamanaka N, Nakajima Y (2004) J Food Prot 67:365–370Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chambers PA, Duggan PS, Heritage J, Forbes JM (2002) J Antimicrob Chemoth 49:161–164Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rønning SB, Vaïtilingom M, Berdal KG, Holst-Jensen A (2003) Eur Food Res Tech 216:347–354Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klotz A, Einspanier R (1998) Mais 3:109–111Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Maddison BC (2003) J Dairy Sci 86:4070–4078Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bendich AJ (1987) BioEssays 6:279–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beever DE, Kemp CF (2000) Nutrition abstracts and reviews Series B: Livestock feeds and feeding 70:175–182Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bakke-McKellep AM (1999) Intestinal nutrient absorption in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and pathophysiological response of the intestinal mucosa to dietary soybean meal. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Swiss Food Manual (2000) SLMB-Methode 52B/2.1.3/2000 (CD-Rom, Eidgenössische Materialzentrale, PO Box, CH 3000, Bern)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christer Røss Nielsen
    • 1
  • Knut G. Berdal
    • 1
  • Anne Marie Bakke-McKellep
    • 2
  • Arne Holst-Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Food and Feed MicrobiologyNational Veterinary InstituteOsloNorway
  2. 2.Aquaculture Protein Centre, Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic MedicineNorwegian School of Veterinary ScienceOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations