Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 222, Issue 5–6, pp 614–621 | Cite as

Behavior and control of Listeria innocua during manufacture and storage of Turkish White Cheese

  • Sebnem Öztürkoğlu
  • G. Candan Gürakan
  • Hami AlpasEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The physico-chemical changes occurring in Turkish White Cheese and the survival of Listeria innocua, total aerobic count (TAC) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in artificially inoculated Turkish White Cheese during manufacture and storage periods (45 days), with respect to different contamination levels of L. innocua were investigated. Turkish White Cheese was manufactured by the short-set procedure in pilot-plant-sized vats in a commercial dairy plant. Pasteurized cow's milk was inoculated with L. innocua to a final level of 3.84 (low dose) and 7.12 (high dose) log10 CFU/ml. Bacterial loads of inoculated milk, whey, post-ripened curd and post-salted cheese was determined during processing at 23 °C. Cheeses were stored in 16% saline solution at 4 °C up to 45 days. Samples were taken from each treatment and analyzed at 5-day intervals. Total reduction in viable cell numbers of L. innocua in Turkish White Cheese with each inoculum dose was approximately 2 log10 cycles during the storage period with a first-order-rate of inactivation at 4 °C. Variations in initial number of LAB in L. innocua seeded cheeses after overnight pressing were observed as 3.84, 4.24, 5.85 log CFU/ml at conditions of high-dose, low-dose inoculation of L. innocua and without inoculation as control sample, respectively. The salt concentration, pH, starter activity and storage time were determined to be the main causes of this reduction in LAB. The results had shown that L. innocua was able to survive during the manufacture and storage due to inadequate pasteurization or post-process contamination. The storage period has been defined as a critical control point (CCP) for consumption of Turkish White Cheese and calculated to be at least 90 and 178 days at refrigeration temperature, in low and high inoculum doses of L. innocua, respectively, for a safe consumption. This study, which gives the result of behavior of low and high dose of Listeria monocytogenes during storage as CCP, can even guide the future risk assessment studies on Listeria in Turkish White Cheese.

Keywords

Turkish White Cheese Listeria innocua HACCP TAC LAB 

References

  1. 1.
    Erkmen O (1995) J Food Prot 58:1201–1205Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abd El-Salam ME, Alichanidis E, Zerfiridis GK (1993) Domiati and Feta type Cheeses. In: Fox PF (ed) Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, Chapman and Hall, London, vol 2, pp 301–335Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdalla OM, Davidson PM, Christen GL (1993) J Food Prot 56:972–976Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marth EH (1986) J Food Prot 49:849–849Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beckers HJ, Soentoro PSS, Delfgou-van Asch EHM (1987) Int J Food Microbiol 4:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryser ET, Marth EH, Doyle MP (1985) J Food Prot 48:746–750Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez CS, Sanchez HH (2000) Int J Food Microbiol 62:149–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manolopoulou E (2003) Int J Food Microbiol 82:153–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yousef AE, Marth EH (1990) J Dairy Sci 73:3351–3356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skovgard N (1990) Facts and trends in microbial contamination of dairy products. Bull IDF 250:31–33Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beckers HJ, Soentoro PSS, Delgou-van Asch EHM (1987) Int J Food Microbiol 4(3):249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tunail N (1999) Microbial Infections and Intoxications. Food Microbiology and the applications, 1st edn. Ankara University Publications, Ankara, Turkey, pp 68–74Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farber JM, Johnston MA, Purvis U, Loit A (1987) Int J Food Microbiol 5:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morgan F, Bonnin V, Mallereau MP, Perrin G (2001) Int J Food Microbiol 64:217–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papageorgiou D, Marth EH (1989) J Food Prot 52:82–87Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pearson LJ, Marth EH (1990) J Dairy Sci 73:912–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dominguez L, Garayazabal JFF, Ferri ER, Vazguez JA, Gomez-Lucia E, Ambrosio C, Suarez G (1987) J Food Prot 50:636Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodriguez E, Gaya P, Nunez M, Medina M (1998) Int J Food Microbiol 39:129–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryser ET, Marth ET (1987) J Food Prot 50:372–378Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loncarevic S, Bannerman E, Billie J, Danielsson-Tham ML, Tham W (1998) Food Microbiol 15:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buchanan RI (1990) Trends Food Sci Technol 1:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arvanitoyannis IS, Mauropoulos AA (2000) Food Cont 11:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    AOAC (1980) Official Methods of Analysis (13th ed.) Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Back JP, Langford SA, Kroll RG (1993) J Dairy Res 60:421–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Erkmen O (2000) J Food Eng 46:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pini PN, Gilbert RJ (1988) Int J Food Microbiol 6:317–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sperber WH (2001) Food Control 12:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fox PF, Wallace JM (1997) Adv Appl Microbiol 45:17–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Czulak J, Conochie J, Sutherland BJ, Vanleeuven HJM (1969) J Dairy Res 36:93–101Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson M (2002) Dairy pipeline. Wisconsin Center for Dairy Research 14, Number 4Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mauropoulos AA, Arvanitoyannis IS (1999) Food Control 10:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebnem Öztürkoğlu
    • 1
  • G. Candan Gürakan
    • 1
  • Hami Alpas
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Food EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations