Advertisement

Anthocyanin composition of the red wine Babić affected by maceration treatment

  • I. Budić-Leto
  • T. Lovrić
  • J. Gajdoš Kljusurić
  • I. Pezo
  • U. Vrhovšek
Original Paper

Abstract

Identification of anthocyanins in the wine made of the Croatian autochthonous grape variety of Babić (Vitis vinifera L.) was carried out and their profile was determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array and mass spectrometric detection. Dependence of anthocyanins content and profile on maceration treatment conditions was investigated. Statistically significant differences of anthocyanins concentration in wines Babić produced by various maceration treatments were confirmed by the use of multivariate analysis of variances. The investigation results indicated that the maceration temperature exerts higher influence on anthocyanins concentration than the duration of maceration. In addition, on the basis of anthocyanin composition and using different multivariate statistical analyses, differentiation of wines Babić according to maceration treatments was procured.

Keywords

Anthocyanins High-performance liquid chromatography Maceration treatment Multivariate analysis Wine Babić 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Sports of the Republic of Croatia. The authors wish to thank Vinoplod-Vinarija, d.d. Šibenik for their aid in the investigations. Anthocyanin analysis were done in the laboratory of Fulvio Mattivi (IASMA, Italy), which is gratefully acknowledged

References

  1. 1.
    Amrani-Joutei K, Glories Y (1996) J Int Sci Vigne Vin 30:41–45Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ribéreau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieu D (2000) Handbook of enology, vol 2. The chemistry of wine stabilization and treatments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eder R, Wendelin S, Barna J (1994) Mitteil Klosterneub 44:201–212Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berente B, de la Garcia D, Reichenbacher M, Danzer K (2000) J Chromatogr A 871:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macheix JJ, Fleuriet A, Billiot J (1990) Fruit phenolics. CRS Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 17–23Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulton R, Singleton VL, Bisson LE, Kunkee RE (1996) Principles and practices of winemaking. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kliewer WM (1976) Am J Enol Vitic 28:96–103Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayen M, Merida J, Medina M (1995) Am J Enol Vitic 46:255–261Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun BH, Spranger I, Roque-do-Vale F, Leonardo C, Belchior P (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:5809–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Budić-Leto I, Lovrić T, Vrhovšek U (2003) Food Technol Biotechnol 41:299–305Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vrhovšek U, Vanzo A, Nemanič J (2002) Vitis 41:47–51Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazza G (1995) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35:341–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nemanič J, Bavčar D, Vanzo A (2002) Mitteil Klosterneub 52:21–28Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scudamore-Smith PD, Hooper RL, McLaren ED (1990) Am J Enol Vitic 41:57–67Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yokotskuka K, Sato M, Ueno N, Singleton VL (2000) J Wine Res 11:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Somers TC (1971) Phytochemistry 10:2175–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Santos-Buelga C, Bravo-Haro S, Rivas-Gonzalo JC (1995) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 269–274Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mateus N, Silva AMS, Vercauteren J, De Freitas V (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:4836–4840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maletić E, Sefc KM, Steinkellner H, Kontić JK, Pejić I (1999) Vitis 38:79-83Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iacono F, Bertamini M, Mattivi F, Scienza A (1994) Vitic Enol Sci (Die Wein-Wissenschaft) 49:220–225Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Statistica 6, StatSoft 2300 East 14th Street, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greenacre MJ (1988) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arvanitoyannis IS, Katsota MN, Psarra EP, Soufleros EH, Kallithraka S (1999) Trends Food Sci Technol 10:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gao L, Girard B, Mazza G, Reynolds AG (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:2003–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bakker J, Pincielli A, Bridle P (1993) Vitis 32:111–118Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burns J, Gardner PT, O''Neil J et al. (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Budić-Leto
    • 1
  • T. Lovrić
    • 2
  • J. Gajdoš Kljusurić
    • 2
  • I. Pezo
    • 1
  • U. Vrhovšek
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst ReclamationZagrebRepublic of Croatia
  2. 2.Faculty of Food Technology and BiotechnologyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebRepublic of Croatia
  3. 3.Istituto Agrario di San MicheleSan Michele all'AdigeItaly

Personalised recommendations