Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 220, Issue 5–6, pp 472–476 | Cite as

Antioxidant potency of cumin varieties—cumin, black cumin and bitter cumin—on antioxidant systems

  • N. B. Thippeswamy
  • K. Akhilender Naidu
Original Paper

Abstract

Cumin is one of the commonly used spices in food preparations. It is also used in traditional medicine as a stimulant, a carminative and an astringent. In this study, we characterized the antioxidant activity of three commercially available cumin varieties, viz., cumin (Cuminum cyminum), black cumin (Nigella sativa) and bitter cumin (C. nigrum). The antioxidant capacity of cumin varieties was tested on Fe2+ ascorbate induced rat liver microsomal lipid peroxidation, soybean lipoxygenase dependent lipid peroxidation and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging methods. The total phenolic content of methanolic extracts of cumin varieties ranged from 4.1 to 53.6 mg g−1 dry weight. Methanolic extracts of all the three varieties of cumin showed higher antioxidant activity compared with that of the aqueous extract. Among the cumin varieties, bitter cumin showed the highest antioxidant activity followed by cumin and black cumin in different antioxidant systems. IC50 values of the methanolic extract of bitter cumin were found to be 0.32, 0.1 and 0.07 mg dry weight of cumin seeds on the lipoxygenase dependent lipid peroxidation system, the DPPH radical scavenging system and the rat liver microsomal lipid peroxidation system, respectively. The data also show that cumin is a potent antioxidant capable of scavenging hydroxy, peroxy and DPPH free radicals and thus inhibits radical-mediated lipid peroxidation. The high antioxidant activity of bitter cumin can be correlated to the high phenolic content among the three cumin varieties. Thus, bitter cumin with a high phenolic content and good antioxidant activity can be supplemented for both nutritional purposes and preservation of foods.

Keywords

Cumin Black cumin Bitter cumin Phenols 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical Soybean lipoxygenase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank V. Prakash, Director, CFTRI, and S.G. Bhat, Head, Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, for their encouragement and support. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance in conducting this work through a project awarded by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi. Financial support to N.B.T. from the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, in the form of a Senior Research Fellowship is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Hashim FM, Elkiey MA (1962) J Phar Sci Arab Rep 3:121–133Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman J (1990) The complete book on spices. Doerling Kindersley, London, 34–38Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    El-Hamidi A, Ahmed SS (1966) Pharamazie 21:438–439Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghosheh OA, Houdi AA, Crooks PA (1999) J Phar Biomed Anal 19:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burits M, Bucar F (2000) Phytother Res 14:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanafy MSM, Hatem ME (1991) J Ethanopharma 34:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morsi NM (2000) Acta Microbiol Polonica 49:63–74Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Hader AA, Aqel MB, Hassan ZA (1993) Int J Pharamcogn 31:96–100Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salomi NJ, Nair SC, Jayawardhanan KK, Varghese CD, Panikkar KR (1992) Cancer Lett 63:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Mofty MM, Abdel-Galil AM, Shwaireb MH, El-Dakhakhny MM, Rizk AM, Hafny EM (1997) Oncol Rep 4:139–141Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Worthen DR, Ghosheh OA, Crooks PA (1998) Anticancer Res 18:1527–1532Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shoieb AM, Elgayyar M, Dudrick PS, Bell JL, Tithof PK (2003) Int J Oncol 22:107–113Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    El-Tahir KE, Ashour MM, Al-Harbi MM (1993) Gen Pharmacol 24:1123–1131Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zaoui A, Cherrah Y, Lacaille-Dubois MA, Settaf A, Amarouch H, Hassar M (2000) Therapie 55:379–382Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daba MH, Abdel Rahman MS (1998) Toxicol Lett 95:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagi MN, Alam K, Badary OA, Al-Shabanah OA, Al-Sawaf HA, Al-Bekairi AM (1999) Biochem Mol Biol Inter 47:153–159Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mansour MA, Ginawi OT, El-Hadiyah T, El-Khatib AS, Al-Shabanah OA, Al-Sawaf HA (2001) Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 110:239–251Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houghton PJR, Zarka R, de las Heras B, Hoult JR (1995) Planta Medica 61:33–36Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdel-Fattah AM, Matsumoto K, Watanabe H (2000) Eur J Pharmacol 400:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keshri G, Singh MM, Lakshmi V, Kamboj VP (1995) Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 39:59–62Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taga MS, Miller EE, Pratt DE (1984) J Am Oil Chem Soc 61:928–993Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shobana S, Naidu KA (2000) Prosta Lueko Essen Fatty Acids 62:107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kamp HH, Wirtz KWZ (1974) Meth Enzymol 32B:1401–146Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller DM, Aust SD (1989) Arch Biochem Biophys 271:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) J Biol Chem 143:265–271Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shimada K, Fujikawa K, Yahara K, Naksmura T (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:945–948Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reddy A, Lokesh BR (1992) Mol Cell Biochem 111:117–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and NutritionCentral Food Technological Research InstituteMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations