European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 220, Issue 2, pp 215–221

Quality control of beer using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and multivariate analysis

  • Dirk W Lachenmeier
  • Willi Frank
  • Eberhard Humpfer
  • Hartmut Schäfer
  • Silke Keller
  • Monika Mörtter
  • Manfred Spraul
Original Paper

Abstract

High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is introduced for the quality control and authenticity assessment of beer in official food control. Measurements were performed using a 400-MHz NMR spectrometer using flow injection technology for automatic sample changing. Only degassing and addition of buffer (pH 5.6 in D2O for locking and 0.1% TSP for referencing) is required to prepare the beer samples. Differences in the spectral profiles of beers varying in type and origin were studied by principal component analysis (PCA), considering the spectrum to be a characteristic fingerprint. For the first time, the high throughput of a Flow-Injection NMR system allowed a comprehensive database of beer spectra for PCA classification to be established efficiently. Beers made with barley malt could be distinguished from those made with wheat malt. Clustering of beers from the same brewing sites was observed, as well as significant discrimination of beers with deteriorated quality. Using the partial least squares (PLS) method to correlate NMR spectra with results from reference methods, models for calculating the original gravity, ethanol and lactic acid were established. The results obtained suggest that NMR is a useful tool in the quality control of beer samples, since quantitative determination of essential compounds as well as chemometric classification are simultaneously possible. Compared to conventional methods, 1H NMR spectroscopy is faster and requires simpler sample preparation.

Keywords

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy Flow injection Beer Principal component analysis (PCA) Partial least squares (PLS) regression 

References

  1. 1.
    Belton PS, Delgadillo I, Holmes E, Nicholls A, Nicholson JK, Spraul M (1996) J Agr Food Chem 44:1483–1487Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedrich W, Galensa R (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 214:388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pusecker K, Holtzel A, Albert K, Bayer E, Wildenauer M, Rust U (1997) Monatsschr Brauwiss 50:70–74Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nord LI, Sorensen SB, Duus JO (2003) Magn Reson Chem 41:660–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Götz J, Schneider J, Först P, Weisser H (2003) J Am Soc Brew Chem 61:37–47Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin GJ, Benbernou M, Lantier F (1985) J Inst Brew 91:242–249Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vinogradov E, Bock K (1998) Carbohydr Res 309:57–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duarte IF, Godejohann M, Braumann U, Spraul M, Gil AM (2003) J Agr Food Chem 51:4847–4852Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duarte IF, Spraul M, Godejohann M, Braumann U, Gil AM (2003) Application of NMR and hyphenated NMR spectroscopy for the study of beer components. In: Belton PS, Gil AM, Webb GA, Rutledge D (eds) Magnetic resonance in food science: latest developments. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 151–157Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gil AM, Le Duarte IF, Godejohann M, Braumann U, Maraschin M, Spraul M (2003) Anal Chim Acta 488:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dufour JP, Leus M, Baxter AJ, Hayman AR, Rezac J, Cepicka J, Viden I (1999) J Am Soc Brew Chem 57:138–144Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duarte I, Barros A, Belton PS, Righelato R, Spraul M, Humpfer E, Gil AM (2002) J Agr Food Chem 50:2475–2481Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gil AM, Duarte I, Cabrita E, Goodfellow BJ, Spraul M, Kerssebaum R (2004) Anal Chim Acta 506:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mawatari M, Nagashima Y, Aoki T, Hirota T, Yamada M (1991) J Am Soc Brew Chem 49:59–64Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daems V, Delvaux F (1997) Food Qual Prefer 8:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siebert KJ, Stenroos LE (1989) J Am Soc Brew Chem 47:93–101Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lonkhuijsen HJv, Douma AC, Angelino SAGF (1998) J Am Soc Brew Chem 56:7–11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siebert KJ (1999) Food Qual Prefer 10:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harayama K, Hayase F, Kato H (1991) Agric Biol Chem 55:393–398Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harayama K, Hayase F, Kato H (1994) Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:1595–1598Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    King BM, Duineveld CAA (1999) Food Qual Prefer 10:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foster RT, Samp EJ, Patino H (2001) J Am Soc Brew Chem 59:201–210Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vind-Larsen O, Williams I, Lillelund AC, Aastrup S, Byrne DV (2003) Techn Q Master Brew Assoc Am 40:193–198Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peppard T (1988) The use of principal components analysis in monitoring the quality of beer. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) Beer analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 264–279Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Belton PS, Colquhoun IJ, Kemsley EK, Delgadillo I, Roma P, Dennis MJ, Sharman M, Holmes E, Nicholson JK, Spraul M (1998) Food Chem 61:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Forveille L, Vercauteren J, Rutledge DN (1996) Food Chem 57:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duarte IF, Barros A, Almeida C, Spraul M, Gil AM (2004) J Agr Food Chem 52:1031–1038Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Donhauser S (1988) German beer purity law and its influences on the properties and analysis of beer. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) Beer analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 280–296Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    EC (1987) Commission Directive (87/250/EEC) on the indication of alcoholic strength by volume in the labelling of alcoholic beverages for sale to the ultimate consumer. Off J Eur Comm L113:57–58Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uhlig R, Gerstenberg H (1993) Brauwelt 133:280–286Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk W Lachenmeier
    • 1
  • Willi Frank
    • 1
  • Eberhard Humpfer
    • 2
  • Hartmut Schäfer
    • 2
  • Silke Keller
    • 2
  • Monika Mörtter
    • 2
  • Manfred Spraul
    • 2
  1. 1.Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Bruker BioSpin GmbHSilberstreifenRheinstettenGermany

Personalised recommendations