Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 217, Issue 1, pp 90–92 | Cite as

Quantitative analysis and molecular identification of bifidobacteria strains in probiotic milk products

  • Marius GrandEmail author
  • Marianne Küffer
  • Andreas Baumgartner
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate an agar medium for the quantitative analysis of bifidobacteria in probiotic milk products on the market, and to investigate the identities of active strains. For this purpose, three sour milk products and a soft cheese brand were each analysed ten times with Wilkins-Chalgren agar (WCA) supplemented with mupirocin, and with MRS agar supplemented with dicloxacillin at two different concentrations. By statistical analysis of the bacterial counts obtained, WCA was shown to have the best detection rate. All the sour milk products examined conformed to Swiss food legislation and contained more than 106 cfu of bifidobacteria per gram of living bifidobacteria. All the samples of soft cheese analysed revealed counts that were clearly (approximately 2 logs) below this minimum requirement. Isolated bifidobacteria strains were all identical with reference strains from producer companies shown by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiling. According to the labels, the three brands of sour milk examined contained different strains of bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium lactis Bb 12, Bifidobacterium animalis DN 173010 and Bifidobacterium species 420). However, all the strains revealed repeatedly identical PFGE-patterns, thus showing a close relationship. These findings show that a better taxonomical definition of commercially used bifidobacteria strains is needed.

Keywords

Bifidobacteria Probiotic milk products Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis Quantification Identification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to DANONE Vitapole France, Chr. Hansen Danemark, Emmi Schweiz AG (Wisby) for making reference strains available to us. We also thank PD Dr. Patrick Boerlin, Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, University of Bern for his technical advice related to PFGE, PD Dr. Urs Pauli, SFOPH for his assistance in the digital documentation of electrophoresis gels and Max Haldimann, SFOPH for the statistical evaluation.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon (2002). Lebensmittelverordnung vom 26. Juni 1995, Stand am 7. Mai 2002 (LMV, SR 817.02). Eidgenössische Druck- und Materialzentrale, Ch-3003 BernGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon (1998). Guideline on the enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented milks. IDF E-Doc 683 Supplement:1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy DAYS, P. Ward, G. Champagne (1996) Int J Food Microbiol 29:11–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rada V, Koc J (2000) Milchwissenschaft 55:65-67Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grand M, Baumgartner A (1997) Arch Lebensmittelhyg 48:121–144Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duez H, Pelletier C, Cools S, Aissi E, Cayuela C, Gavini F, Bouquelet S, Neut Cand, Mengaud J(2000) J Appl Microbiol 88:1019–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein G, Pack A, Bonaparte C, Reuter G(1998) Int J Food Microbiol 41:103–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marius Grand
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marianne Küffer
    • 1
  • Andreas Baumgartner
    • 1
  1. 1.Microbiology and Biotechnology SectionSwiss Federal Office of Public HealthBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations