European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 216, Issue 3, pp 185–192 | Cite as

Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition: fate of feed-ingested foreign DNA in pig bodies

Original Paper

Abstract.

The passage and fate of ingested DNA in 48 pigs fed with diets containing (n=12) parental or (n=36) transgenic (Bt) maize were examined. Pigs were fattened from an initial live weight of 24 kg to approximately 108 kg. Animals fed transgenic maize were slaughtered in groups (n=6) 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after feeding the last maize-containing diet. Those slaughtered at up to 12 h received no further feed, while those held for longer prior to slaughter received a diet in which maize was replaced by barley and wheat. Control animals were slaughtered at 4 and 8 h. DNA extracted from tissues and gut contents was examined by PCR for the presence of plant DNA and for any transgenic material. Recombinant DNA was detectable in the intestinal contents up to 48 h after the last feeding of a diet containing the transgenic maize. PCR amplification of plant gene spacers produced fragments of different sizes, dependent on feed source. The feed source of rectum samples depended on individual passage rate in the groups and their restriction analysis showed grain species-specific patterns. Recombinant or maize-specific DNA was not detectable in tissue samples of pigs. In contrast, plant DNA fragments were detectable in the investigated pig tissues.

Keywords.

GMO Pig Bt maize Bt corn PCR DNA transfer passage rate 

References

  1. 1.
    Finucane ML (2002) Proc Nutr Soc 61:31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shelton AM, Zhao JZ, Roush RT (2002) Annu Rev Entomol 47:845–881Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark A, Lehman H (2001) J Agric Environ Ethics 14:3–28Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phipps RH, Park JR (2002) J Anim Feed Sci 11:1–18Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aumaitre A, Aulrich K, Chesson A, Flachowsky G, Piva G (2002) Livest Prod Sci 74:223–238Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faust MA (2002) Livest Prod Sci 74:254–239Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flachowsky G, Aulrich K (2001) J Anim Feed Sci 10(1):181–194Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CEC (2001) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/biotech/biotech08_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paabo S, Gifford JA, Wilson AC (1988) Nucleic Acids Res 16:9775–9787Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oota H, Saitou N, Matsushita T, Ueda S (1999) Am J Hum Genet 64:250–258Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forbes JM, Blair GE, Chiter A, Perks S (1998) Scientific report no 376, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiter A, Forbes JM, Blair GE (2000) FEBS Lett 481:164–168Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schubbert R, Lettmann C, Doerfler W (1994) Mol Gen Genet 242:495–504Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schubbert R, Hohlweg H, Renz D, Doerfler W (1998) Mol Gen Genet 259:569–576Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hohlweg U, Doerfler W (2001) Mol Gen Genet 265:225–233Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doerfler W (2000) Viley-VCM, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doerfler W (1995) Advances in Cancer Research 66:313–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Einspanier R, Klotz A, Kraft J, Aulrich K, Poser R, Schwägele F, Jahreis G, Flachowsky G (2001) Eur Food Res Technol 212:129–134Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aeschbacher K, Meile L, Messikommer R, Wenk C (2002) Proc Soc Nutr Physiol 11:196Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klotz A, Mayer J, Einspanier R (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 214(4):271–275Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reuter T, Aulrich K, Berk A, Flachowsky G (2002) Arch Anim Nutr 56:23–31Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reuter T, Aulrich K, Berk A (2002) Arch Anim Nutr (in press)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    EC (1997) http://www.gentechnik.gv.at/gentechnik/gesetz/entscheidung5.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Plant Mol Biol 17:1105–1109Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steinmetz A, Gubbins EJ, Bogorad L (1982) Nucleic Acids Res 10:3027–3037Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyer R, Candrian U, Luethy J (1994) Journal of AOAC International 77 (3):617–622Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ehlers B, Strauch E, Goltz M, Kubsch D, Wagner H, Maidhof H, Appel B, Buhk H-J (1997) Bundesgesundheitsblatt 118–121Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu J, Pemberton GH, Almira EC, McCarty DR, Koch KE (1995) Plant Physiol 108:1293–1294Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hupfer C, Hotzel H, Sachse K, Engel K-H (1998) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 206:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning, Band 1–3, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Phipps RH, Beever DE (2000) J Anim Feed Sci 9:543–561Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anklam E, Gadani F, Heinze P, Pijnenburg H, Eede G van den (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 214:3–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Animal NutritionFederal Agricultural Research Centre Braunschweig (FAL)BraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations