Characterization and differential retention of Q beta bacteriophage virus-like particles using cyclical electrical field–flow fractionation and asymmetrical flow field–flow fractionation
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are widely used in medicine, but can be difficult to characterize and isolate from aggregates. In this research, primarily cyclical electrical field–flow fractionation (CyElFFF) coupled with multi-angle light scattering (MALS), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) detectors, was used for the first time to perform size and electrical characterization of three different types of Q beta bacteriophage virus-like particles (VLPs): a blank Q beta bacteriophage which is denoted as VLP and two conjugated ones with different peptides. The CyElFFF results were verified with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Asymmetrical flow field–flow fractionation (AF4) coupled with MALS was also applied using conditions similar to those used in the CyElFFF experiments, and the results of the two techniques were compared to each other. Using these techniques, the size and electrophoretic characteristics of the fractionated VLPs in CyElFFF were obtained. The results indicate that CyElFFF can be used to obtain a clear distribution of electrophoretic mobilities for each type of VLP. Accordingly, CyElFFF was able to differentially retain and isolate VLPs with high surface electric charge/electrophoretic mobility from the ones with low electric charge/electrophoretic mobility. Regarding the size characterization, the size distribution of the eluted VLPs was obtained using both techniques. CyElFFF was able to identify subpopulations that did not appear in the AF4 results by generating a shoulder peak, whereas AF4 produced a single peak. Different size characteristics of the VLPs appearing in the shoulder peak and the main peak indicate that CyElFFF was able to isolate aggregated VLPs from the monomers partially.
KeywordsVirus-like particles Characterization Chromatography Electrical field–flow fractionation Asymmetrical flow field–flow fractionation
Research was supported by Pfizer to B.K. Gale.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Gigault J, Le Hécho I, Dubascoux S, Potin-Gautier M, Lespes G. Single walled carbon nanotube length determination by asymmetrical-flow field-flow fractionation hyphenated to multi-angle laser-light scattering. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(50):7891–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Schimpf ME, Caldwell K, Giddings JC. Field-flow fractionation handbook: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.Google Scholar
- 16.Srinivas M. Cyclical electrical field-flow fractionation: Louisiana Tech University; 2002.Google Scholar
- 18.Ornthai M, Siripinyanond A, Gale BK. Effect of ionic and non-ionic carriers in electrical field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem. 2015.Google Scholar
- 23.Dunkel M, Tri N, Beckett R, Caldwell KD. Electrical field-flow fractionation: a tool for characterization of colloidal adsorption complexes. J Microcolumn Sep. 1997;9(3):177–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(1997)9:3<177::AID-MCS6>3.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Buranawatanachoke B. Bioprocess analysis using computational fluid dynamics and ultra scale-down. PhD [dissertation]. University of London; 2008. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1445209/.
- 29.Ryoo R, Joo SH, Kruk M, Jaroniec M. Ordered mesoporous carbons. Adv Mater. 2001;13(9):677–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200105)13:9<677::AID-ADMA677>3.0.CO;2-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gale BK. A decade of progress in microscale electrical field-flow fractionation: AES Electrophoresis Society; [Available from: http://www.aesociety.org/areas/fff.php.
- 33.Chroboczek J, Szurgot I, Szolajska E. Virus-like particles as vaccine. Acta Biochim Pol. 2014;(61, 3):531–9. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2014_1875.
- 37.Pease LF, Lipin DI, Tsai DH, Zachariah MR, Lua LH, Tarlov MJ, et al. Quantitative characterization of virus-like particles by asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation, electrospray differential mobility analysis, and transmission electron microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102(3):845–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Lang R, Vogt L, Zuercher A, Winter G. Virus-like particle characterization using AF4 channel technology. Am Lab. 2010;42(5):13–5.Google Scholar
- 40.Citkowicz A, Petry H, Harkins RN, Ast O, Cashion L, Goldmann C, et al. Characterization of virus-like particle assembly for DNA delivery using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and light scattering. Anal Biochem. 2008;376(2):163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.02.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Steppert P, Burgstaller D, Klausberger M, Tover A, Berger E, Jungbauer A. Quantification and characterization of virus-like particles by size-exclusion chromatography and nanoparticle tracking analysis. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1487:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Schwartz L. Diafiltration: a fast, efficient method for desalting or buffer exchange of biological samples. Pall Scientific & Technical Report. 2003.Google Scholar
- 48.Booth DS, Avila-Sakar A, Cheng Y. Visualizing proteins and macromolecular complexes by negative stain EM: from grid preparation to image acquisition. J Vis Exp. 2011;58. https://doi.org/10.3791/3227.
- 52.Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and surface forces: revised third edition. Intermolecular and Surface Forces Elsevier Science. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21560-1.