Online monitoring of the cell-specific oxygen uptake rate with an in situ combi-sensor

  • Katharina Dahlmann
  • Christoph Busse
  • Florian Aupert
  • Ingo de Vries
  • Daniel Marquard
  • Dörte SolleEmail author
  • Frank Lammers
  • Thomas Scheper
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Advances in Process Analytics and Control Technology


In a biotechnological process, standard monitored process variables are pH, partial oxygen pressure (pO2), and temperature. These process variables are important, but they do not give any information about the metabolic activity of the cell. The ISICOM is an in situ combi-sensor that is measuring the cell-specific oxygen uptake rate (qOUR) online. This variable allows a qualitative judgement of metabolic cell activity. The measuring principle of the ISICOM is based on a volume element enclosed into a small measuring chamber. Inside the measuring chamber, the pO2 and the scattered light is measured. Within a defined measuring interval, the chamber closes, and the oxygen supply for the cells is interrupted. The decreasing oxygen concentration is recorded by the pO2 optode. This measuring principle, known as the dynamic method, determines the oxygen uptake rate (OUR). Together with the scattered light signal, the cell concentration is estimated and the qOUR is available online. The design of the ISICOM is focused on functionality, sterility, long-term stability, and response time behavior so the sensor can be used in bioprocesses. With the ISICOM, measurement of online and in situ measurement of the OUR is possible. The OUR and qOUR online measurement of an animal cell batch cultivation is demonstrated, with maximum values of OUR = 2.5 mmol L−1 h−1 and a qOUR = 9.5 pmol cell−1 day−1. Information about limitation of the primary and secondary substrate is derived by the monitoring of the metabolic cell activity of bacteria and yeast cultivation processes. This sensor contributes to a higher process understanding by offering an online view on to the cell behavior. In the sense of process analytical technology (PAT), this important information is needed for bioprocesses to realize a knowledge base process control.


Sensor Cell-specific oxygen uptake rate Bioprocess monitoring OUR 


Funding information

This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) within the Promotion of Joint Industrial Research Program (IGF) due to a decision of the German Bundestag. It was part of the research project 19361 N by the Association for Research in Precision Mechanics, Optics, and Medical Technology (F.O.M.) under the auspices of the German Federation of Industrial Research Associations (AiF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Guideline ICHHT. Pharmaceutical development Q8 (R2). Curr step. 2009;4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Administration F and D. Guidance for industry, PAT-A framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing and quality assurance. http//www fda gov/cder/guidance/published html. 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swann P, Brophy L, Strachan D, Lilly E, Jeffers P. Biomanufacturing technology roadmap - in-line monitoring and real-time release [Internet]. 2017. Available from:
  4. 4.
    Valero F, López-Santín J. Online Analysis for industrial bioprocesses: gas analysis. In: Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; 2017. p. 649–678.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heinzle E, Reuss M. Mass spectrometry in biotechnological process analysis and control: Springer; 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coppella SJ, Dhurjati P. Low-cost computer-coupled fermentor off-gas analysis via quadrupole mass spectrometer. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987;29(6):679–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schügerl K. Progress in monitoring, modeling and control of bioprocesses during the last 20 years. J Biotechnol. 2001;85(2):149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E, Santos VE, Merchuk JC. Oxygen uptake rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biochem Eng J. 2010;49(3):289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jenkins RR, Friedland R, Howald H. The relationship of oxygen uptake to superoxide dismutase and catalase activity in human skeletal muscle. Int J Sports Med. 1984;5(01):11–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Behr L, Joeris K, Burnett M, Scheper T. A novel in situ probe for oxygen uptake rate measurement in mammalian cell cultures. Biotechnol Prog. 2012;28(2):581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biechele P, Busse C, Solle D, Scheper T, Reardon K. Sensor systems for bioprocess monitoring. Eng Life Sci. 2015;15(5):469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busse C, Biechele P, Vries I, Reardon KF, Solle D, Scheper T. Sensors for disposable bioreactors. Eng Life Sci. 2017.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marquard D, Enders A, Roth G, Rinas U, Scheper T, Lindner P. In situ microscopy for online monitoring of cell concentration in Pichia pastoris cultivations. J Biotechnol. 2016;234:90–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rode B, Endres C, Ran C, Stahl F, Beutel S, Kasper C, et al. Large-scale production and homogenous purification of long chain polysialic acids from E. coli K1. J Biotechnol. 2008;135(2):202–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandor M, Rüdinger F, Bienert R, Grimm C, Solle D, Scheper T. Comparative study of non-invasive monitoring via infrared spectroscopy for mammalian cell cultivations. J Biotechnol. 2013;168(4):636–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graf A, Claßen J, Solle D, Hitzmann B, Rebner K, Hoehse M. A novel LED-based 2D-fluorescence spectroscopy system for in-line monitoring of Chinese hamster ovary cell cultivations–part I. Eng Life Sci. .Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    GmbH PPS. O2 Sensorspot SP-PSt3-YAUe [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 22]. Available from:
  18. 18.
    Deshpande RR, Heinzle E. On-line oxygen uptake rate and culture viability measurement of animal cell culture using microplates with integrated oxygen sensors. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(9):763–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoon S, Konstantinov KB. Continuous, real-time monitoring of the oxygen uptake rate (OUR) in animal cell bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;44(8):983–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goudar CT, Piret JM, Konstantinov KB. Estimating cell specific oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production rates for mammalian cells in perfusion culture. Biotechnol Prog. 2011;27(5):1347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deshpande RR, Heinzle E. Online monitoring of oxygen in spinner flasks. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31(5):665–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jorjani P, Ozturk SS. Effects of cell density and temperature on oxygen consumption rate for different mammalian cell lines. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;64(3):349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ducommun P, Kadouri A, Von Stockar U, Marison IW. On-line determination of animal cell concentration in two industrial high-density culture processes by dielectric spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;77(3):316–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brischwein M, Motrescu ER, Cabala E, Otto AM, Grothe H, Wolf B. Functional cellular assays with multiparametric silicon sensor chips. Lab Chip. 2003;3(4):234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wiest J, Stadthagen T, Schmidhuber M, Brischwein M, Ressler J, Raeder U, et al. Intelligent mobile lab for metabolics in environmental monitoring. Anal Lett. 2006;39(8):1759–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Dahlmann
    • 1
  • Christoph Busse
    • 1
  • Florian Aupert
    • 1
  • Ingo de Vries
    • 1
  • Daniel Marquard
    • 1
  • Dörte Solle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frank Lammers
    • 2
  • Thomas Scheper
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Technische ChemieGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.SanofiFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations