Hydrophilic and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as “green” solvents were applied in this study for the microextraction of environmental samples. A series of DESs (five hydrophilic and three hydrophobic) were synthesized and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Physicochemical property parameters of eight DESs including water solubility, density, conductivity, and freezing point were assessed. Compared with the performance of five hydrophilic DESs in water phase, the three hydrophobic DESs were more suitable for application in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of sulfonamides in water sample. In dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction process, analytical parameters including type and volume of extraction solvent, extraction time, and pH of water sample were investigated. Under optimum conditions, 60 μL of hydrophobic DESs was used for extraction for 2 min in pH = 7.0 sample. The linear ranges were 0.05–5.0 μg/mL for the four sulfonamides with the correlation coefficients in the range of 0.9991–0.9999. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.0005–0.0009 μg/mL and the limits of quantification were in the range of 0.0019–0.0033 μg/mL. The recoveries of the analytes of the proposed method for the spiked samples were 80.17–93.5%, with the relative standard deviation less than 6.31%. The results indicated that three hydrophobic DESs showed commendable performance for extraction of sulfonamides, and hydrophobic DES-based microextraction method was successfully applied for monitoring sulfonamides in water samples.
Deep eutectic solvents Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction Hydrophobic Sulfonamides
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.21808173), and it was also supported by the Training Project of Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin (No.TD13-5020). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Korea government (MSIT) (No.NRF-2019R1A2C1010032).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.
Zhang H, Qiao X, Cai T, et al. Preparation and characterization of carbon dot-decorated silica stationary phase in deep eutectic solvents for hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(9):2401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang B, Park HE, Row KH. Preparation of chlorocholine chloride/urea deep eutectic solvent-modified silica and an examination of the ion exchange properties of modified silica as a Lewis adduct. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(17):4309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozturk B, Parkinson C, Gonzalez-Miquel M. Extraction of polyphenolic antioxidants from orange peel waste using deep eutectic solvents. Sep Purif Technol. 2018;206:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivedi TJ, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Jeong YK, Choi JW. Deep eutectic solvents as attractive media for CO 2 capture. Green Chem. 2016;18:2834–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germani R, Orlandini M, Tiecco M, et al. Novel low viscous, green and amphiphilic N-oxides/phenylacetic acid based Deep Eutectic Solvents. J Mol Liq. 2017;240:233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu N, Li L, Liu X, et al. Specific recognition of polyphenols by molecularly imprinted polymers based on a ternary deep eutectic solvent. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1530:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamei N, Ezoddin M, Ardestani MS, et al. Dispersion of magnetic graphene oxide nanoparticles coated with a deep eutectic solvent using ultrasound assistance for preconcentration of methadone in biological and water samples followed by GC–FID and GC–MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(26):6113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li Z, Jia J, Wang M, et al. Bifunctionalized ordered mesoporous organosilica synthesized in deep eutectic solvent for extraction of triazine herbicides from watermelon. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1529:50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massolo E, Palmieri S, Benaglia M, et al. Stereoselective organocatalysed reactions in deep eutectic solvents: highly tunable and biorenewable reaction media for sustainable organic synthesis. Green Chem. 2016;18:792–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu P, Hao JW, Mo LP, et al. Recent advances in the application of deep eutectic solvents as sustainable media as well as catalysts in organic reactions. RSC Adv. 2015;5:48675–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott AP, El Ttaib K, Frisch G, et al. The electrodeposition of silver composites using deep eutectic solvents. Phys Chem. 2012;14:2443–9.Google Scholar
Jhong HR, Wong DSH, Wan CC, et al. A novel deep eutectic solvent-based ionic liquid used as electrolyte for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochem Commun. 2009;11:209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison HG, Sun CC, Neervannan S. Characterization of thermal behavior of deep eutectic solvents and their potential as drug solubilization vehicles. Int J Pharm. 2009;378:136–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishov A, Bulatov A, Locatelli M, et al. Application of deep eutectic solvents in analytical chemistry. A review. Microchem J. 2017;135:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu N, Lv R, Guo Z, et al. Environmentally friendly and non-polluting solvent pretreatment of palm samples for polyphenol analysis using choline chloride deep eutectic solvents. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1492:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada E, Roldán-Ruiz MJ, Riobóo RJJ, et al. Nanophase separation in aqueous dilutions of a ternary DES as revealed by Brillouin and NMR spectroscopy. J Mol Liq. 2019;276:196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang W, Dai Y, Row KH. Evaluation of fatty acid/alcohol-based hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as media for extracting antibiotics from environmental water. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(28):7325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan S, Xie H, Zhong R, et al. A highly efficient three-phase single drop microextraction technique for sample preconcentration. Analyst. 2015;140:3193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran NH, Chen H, Van Do T, et al. Simultaneous analysis of multiple classes of antimicrobials in environmental water samples using SPE coupled with UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS and isotope dilution. Talanta. 2016;159:163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadmi Y, Favier L, Lotfi M, et al. A highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of a toxic water disinfection by-product, N-nitrosomethylethylamine. Anal Methods. 2014;6:3231–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostafavi B, Feizbakhsh A, Konoz E, et al. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent based on centrifugation-free dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for speciation of selenium in aqueous samples: one step closer to green analytical chemistry. Microchem J. 2019;148:582–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiśniewski JR. Quantitative evaluation of filter aided sample preparation (FASP) and multienzyme digestion FASP protocols. Anal Chem. 2016;88:5438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang X, Li Y, Cai F, et al. Fully automatic single-drop microextraction with one-setp extraction and derivatization and its application for rapid analysis of hydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seawaters. Talanta. 2017;164:727–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šrámková I, Horstkotte B, Sklenářová H, et al. A novel approach to lab-in-syringe head-space single-drop microextraction and on-drop sensing of ammonia. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;934:132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashemi M, Zohrabi P, Torkejokar M. Forced vortex assisted liquid phase microextraction for preconcentration and spectrophotometric determination of mefenamic acid in biological samples. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;176:126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šandrejová J, Campillo N, Viñas P, et al. Classification and terminology in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Microchem J. 2016;127:184–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen B, Wu F, Wu W, et al. Determination of 27 pesticides in wine by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Microchem J. 2016;126:415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar