Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 27, pp 7197–7206 | Cite as

Online mass spectrometry of CE (SDS)-separated proteins by two-dimensional capillary electrophoresis

  • Jennifer Römer
  • Cristina Montealegre
  • Johannes Schlecht
  • Steffen Kiessig
  • Bernd Moritz
  • Christian NeusüßEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is the fundamental technique for protein separation by size. Applying this technology in capillary format, gaining high separation efficiency in a more automated way, is a key technology for size separation of proteins in the biopharmaceutical industry. However, unequivocal identification by online mass spectrometry (MS) is impossible so far, due to strong interference in the electrospray process by SDS and other components of the SDS-MW separation gel buffer. Here, a heart-cut two-dimensional electrophoretic separation system applying an electrically isolated valve with an internal loop of 20 nL is presented. The peak of interest in the CE (SDS) separation is transferred to the CZE-MS, where electrospray-interfering substances of the SDS-MW gel are separated prior to online electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. An online SDS removal strategy for decomplexing the protein-SDS complex is implemented in the second dimension, consisting of the co-injection of organic solvent and cationic surfactant. This online CE (SDS)-CZE-MS system allows MS characterization of proteoforms separated in generic CE (SDS), gaining additional separation in the CZE and detailed MS information. In general, the system can be applied to all kinds of proteins separated by CE (SDS). Here, we present results of the CE (SDS)-CZE-MS system on the analysis of several biopharmaceutically relevant antibody impurities and fragments. Additionally, the versatile application spectrum of the system is demonstrated by the analysis of extracted proteins from soybean flour. The online hyphenation of CE (SDS) resolving power and MS identification capabilities will be a powerful tool for protein and mAb characterization.

Graphical abstract

Two-dimensional capillary electrophoresis system hyphenated with mass spectrometry for the characterization of CE (SDS)-separated proteins. As first dimension, a generic and high MS-interfering CE (SDS) separation is performed for size separation. After heart-cut transfer of the unknown CE (SDS) protein peak, via a four-port nanoliter valve to a volatile electrolyte system as second dimension, interference-free mass spectrometric data of separated mAb fragments and soybean proteins are obtained.

Keywords

Capillary electrophoresis Two-dimension CE (SDS) Monoclonal antibody Sodium dodecyl sulfate Mass spectrometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Laura Sánchez-Hernández for helpful discussions and Kevin Jooß for the support in data interpretation.

Author’s contributions

JR, CM, and JS developed the methods and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. SK and BM conceived the approach and wrote the paper. CN initiated and supervised the project, conceived the approach, and wrote the paper.

Funding information

This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_2102_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (440 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 439 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gennaro LA, Salas-Solano O, Ma S. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry as a characterization tool for therapeutic proteins. Anal Biochem. 2006;355(2):249–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunt G, Nashabeh W. Capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate nongel sieving analysis of a therapeutic recombinant monoclonal antibody. A biotechnology perspective. Anal Chem. 1999;71(13):2390–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lacher NA, Wang Q, Roberts RK, Holovics HJ, Aykent S, Schlittler MR, et al. Development of a capillary gel electrophoresis method for monitoring disulfide isomer heterogeneity in IgG2 antibodies. Electrophoresis. 2010;31(3):448–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michels DA, Brady LJ, Guo A, Balland A. Fluorescent derivatization method of proteins for characterization by capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal Chem. 2007;79(15):5963–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salas-Solano O, Tomlinson B, Du S, Parker M, Strahan A, Ma S. Optimization and validation of a quantitative capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate method for quality control and stability monitoring of monoclonal antibodies. Anal Chem. 2006;78(18):6583–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Creamer JS, Oborny NJ, Lunte SM. Recent advances in the analysis of therapeutic proteins by capillary and microchip electrophoresis. Anal Methods. 2014;6(15):5427–49.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao SS, Chen DDY. Applications of capillary electrophoresis in characterizing recombinant protein therapeutics. Electrophoresis. 2014;35(1):96–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El Deeb S, Watzig H, Abd El-Hady D, Sanger-van de Griend C, GKE S. Recent advances in capillary electrophoretic migration techniques for pharmaceutical analysis (2013-2015). Electrophoresis. 2016;37(12):1591–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tamizi E, Jouyban A. The potential of the capillary electrophoresis techniques for quality control of biopharmaceuticals-a review. Electrophoresis. 2015;36(6):831–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gahoual R, Beck A, Leize-Wagner E, Francois Y-N. Cutting-edge capillary electrophoresis characterization of monoclonal antibodies and related products. J Chromatogr B. 2016;1032:61–78.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rundlett KL, Armstrong DW. Mechanism of signal suppression by anionic surfactants in capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1996;68(19):3493–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kachuk C, Stephen K, Doucette A. Comparison of sodium dodecyl sulfate depletion techniques for proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1418:158–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanchez-Hernandez L, Montealegre C, Kiessig S, Moritz B, Neusüß C. In-capillary approach to eliminate SDS interferences in antibody analysis by capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 2016;38(7):1044–52.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu JJ, Zhu Z, Wang W, Liu S. Coupling sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry via a poly (tetrafluoroethylene) membrane. Anal Chem. 2011;83(5):1784–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kotia RB, Raghani AR. Analysis of monoclonal antibody product heterogeneity resulting from alternate cleavage sites of signal peptide. Anal Biochem. 2010;399(2):190–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaschak T, Boyd D, Yan B. Characterization of glycation in an IgG1 by capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate and mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2011;417(2):256–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlecht J, Jooß K, Neusüß C. Two-dimensional capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-CE-MS): coupling MS-interfering capillary electromigration methods with mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(25):6353–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross ARS, Lee PJ, Smith DL, Langridge JI, Whetton AD, Gaskell SJ. Identification of proteins from two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels using a novel acid-labile surfactant. Proteomics. 2002;2(7):928–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    König S, Schmidt O, Rose K, Thanos S, Besselmann M, Zeller M. Sodium dodecyl sulfate versus acid-labile surfactant gel electrophoresis: comparative proteomic studies on rat retina and mouse brain. Electrophoresis. 2003;24(4):751–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Root BE, Zhang B, Barron AE. Size-based protein separations by microchip electrophoresis using an acid-labile surfactant as a replacement for SDS. Electrophoresis. 2009;30(12):2117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Y, Reddy MP, Ratnayake CK, Koh EV. Methods and compositions for capillary electrophoresis (CE). United States patent (US007381317B2). 2003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kler PA, Sydes D, Huhn C. Column-coupling strategies for multidimensional electrophoretic separation techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407(1):119–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kohl FJ, Sánchez-Hernández L, Neusüß C. Capillary electrophoresis in two-dimensional separation systems: techniques and applications. Electrophoresis. 2015;36(1):144–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu X, Liu K, Fan ZH. Microscale 2D separation systems for proteomic analysis. Expert Rev Proteomic. 2012;9(2):135–47.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grochocki W, Markuszewski MJ, Quirino JP. Multidimensional capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2015;36(1):135–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kohl FJ, Montealegre C, Neusüß C. On-line two-dimensional capillary electrophoresis with mass spectrometric detection using a fully electric isolated mechanical valve. Electrophoresis. 2016;37(7–8):954–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neuberger S, Jooss K, Ressel C, Neususs C. Quantification of ascorbic acid and acetylsalicylic acid in effervescent tablets by CZE-UV and identification of related degradation products by heart-cut CZE-CZE-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(30):8701–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jooß K, Hühner J, Kiessig S, Moritz B, Neusüß C. Two-dimensional capillary zone electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for the characterization of intact monoclonal antibody charge variants, including deamidation products. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(26):6057–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hühner J, Neusüß C. CIEF-CZE-MS applying a mechanical valve. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(15):4055–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hühner J, Jooß K, Neusüß C. Interference-free mass spectrometric detection of capillary isoelectric focused proteins, including charge variants of a model monoclonal antibody. Electrophoresis. 2017;38(6):914–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Montealegre C, Neusüß C. Coupling imaged capillary isoelectric focusing with mass spectrometry using a nanoliter valve. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(9–10):1151–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Höcker O, Montealegre C, Neusüß C. Characterization of a nanoflow sheath liquid interface and comparison to a sheath liquid and a sheathless porous-tip interface for CE-ESI-MS in positive and negative ionization. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(21):5265–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu H, Gaza-Bulseco G, Lundell E. Assessment of antibody fragmentation by reversed-phase liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2008;876(1):13–23.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vlasak J, Ionescu R. Fragmentation of monoclonal antibodies. mAbs. 2014;3(3):253–63.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lasorsa A, Losacco M, Iacobazzi RM, Porcelli L, Azzariti A, Natile G, et al. Probing the interaction between cisplatin and the therapeutic monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. RSC Adv. 2016;6(35):29229–36.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moritz B, Stracke JO. Assessment of disulfide and hinge modifications in monoclonal antibodies. Electrophoresis. 2017;38(6):769–85.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li L, Wang C, Qiang S, Zhao J, Song S, Jin W, et al. Mass spectrometric analysis of N-glycoforms of soybean allergenic glycoproteins separated by SDS-PAGE. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:7367–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yaklich RW. ß-Conglycinin and glycinin in high-protein soybean seeds. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(2).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sathe SK, Lilley GG, Mason AC, Weaver CM. High-resolution sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of soybean (Glycin max L.) seed proteins. Cereal Chem. 1987;64(6):380–4.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mujoo R, Trinh DT, Ng PKW. Characterization of storage proteins in different soybean varieties and their relationship to tofu yield and texture. Food Chem. 2003;82:265–73.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blazek V, Caldwell RA. Comparison of SDS gel capillary electrophoresis with microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technology to quantify relative amounts of 7S and 11S proteins from 20 soybean cultivars. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2009;44(11):2127–34.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu S, Zhou R, Tian S, Gai J. A study on subunit groups of soybean protein extracts under SDS-PAGE. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2007;84:793–801.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Römer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cristina Montealegre
    • 1
  • Johannes Schlecht
    • 1
    • 3
  • Steffen Kiessig
    • 3
  • Bernd Moritz
    • 3
  • Christian Neusüß
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryAalen UniversityAalenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Chemo- and BiosensorsUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  3. 3.F. Hoffmann-La Roche LtdBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations