Advertisement

Vibrational extraction QuEChERS for analysis of antiparasitic agents in fish by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

  • Lenise Guimarães de OliveiraEmail author
  • Abilasha Ramkumar
  • Mary Moloney
  • Márcia Helena Scherer Kurz
  • Fábio Ferreira Gonçalves
  • Osmar Damian Prestes
  • Martin Danaher
Research Paper

Abstract

A method was developed for the analysis of 22 antiparasitic residues belonging to the benzoylurea, organophosphate, pyrimidinamine, pyrethrin and pyrethroid classes in salmon by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were extracted with acetonitrile–water as the extraction solvent with use of a vibrational shaking apparatus with a ceramic homogenizer. After extraction, the acetonitrile extracts were cleaned up by incubation at low temperature (-20 °C, 1 h) to remove fat, followed by dispersive solid-phase extraction using Z-Sep+ and primary–secondary amine as sorbents. Validation was performed following the 2002/657/EC and SANTE/11813/2017 guidelines. The trueness of the method ranged from 87% to 121% and precision ranged from 4.1% to 23.7%, with the exception of cyphenothrin, dicyclanil and azamethiphos. The method developed is particularly advantageous because the use of a vibrational shaker allows unattended extraction of samples and eliminates a laborious tissue disruption step, which increases sample throughput in the laboratory. The sample preparation and chromatographic separations can be performed in 5 and 4 h, respectively, for 36 samples.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Antiparasitic drug residues Fish Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry Dispersive solid-phase extraction Vibrational extraction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the CAPES PDSE scholarship programme (grant no. 88881.134557/2016-01). All the instrumentation and facilities were funded by Teagasc Food Research Centre (Ireland).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

216_2019_2062_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (519 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 519 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nadarajah S, Flaaten O. Global aquaculture growth and institutional quality. Mar. Policy. 2017;84:142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Salmon Farmers Association. Salmon farming: sustaining communities and feeding the world. https://www.ifa.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ISFA-Report-2018-web.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2018.
  3. 3.
    Burridge L, Weis JS, Cabello F, Pizarro J, Bostick K. Chemical use in salmon aquaculture: a review of current practices and possible environmental effects. Aquaculture. 2010;306:7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Langford KH, Øxnevad S, Schøyen M, Thomas KV. Do antiparasitic medicines used in aquaculture pose a risk to the Norwegian aquatic environment? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:7774–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fodey TL, Thompson CS, Traynor IM, Barnes P, Kennedy DG, Crooks SR. Immunochemical techniques for the detection of the parasiticide dicyclanil in ovine tissue. Food Anal. Methods. 2015;8:438–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goutailler G, Guillard C, Faure R, Païssé O. Degradation pathway of dicyclanil in water in the presence of titanium dioxide. Comparison with photolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:5115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montforts MHMM, Van Rijswick HFMW, de Haes HU. Legal constraints in EU product labelling to mitigate the environmental risk of veterinary medicines at use. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004;40:327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aznar R, Albero B, Sánchez-Brunete C, Miguel E, Martín-Girela I, Tadeo JL. Simultaneous determination of multiclass emerging contaminants in aquatic plants by ultrasound-assisted matrix solid-phase dispersion and GC-MS. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:7911–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang W, Wang D, Wang J, Wu Z, Li L, Huang M, et al. Pyrethroid pesticide residues in the global environment: an overview. Chemosphere. 2018;191:990–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tuck S, Furey A, Crooks S, Danaher M. A review of methodology for the analysis of pyrethrin and pyrethroid residues in food of animal origin. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo Risk Assess. 2018;35:911–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enz A, Pombo-Villar E. Class II pyrethroids: noninhibitors calcineurin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997;54:321–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu Y, Miao H, Fan S. Separation of chiral pyrethroids pesticide sans application in pharmacokinetics research and human exposure assessment. In: Stoytcheva M, editor. Pesticides in the modern world effects of pesticides exposure. Rijeka: In Tech; 2011. p. 139–66. http://www.intechopen.com/books/pesticides-in-the-modern-world-effects-of-pesticides-exposure/separation-of-chiral-pyrethroid-pesticides-and-application-in-pharmacokinetics-research-and-human-ex. Accessed 19 Dec 2018.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mnif W, Hassine AIH, Bouaziz A, Bartegi A, Thomas O, Roig B. Effect of endocrine disruptor pesticides: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:2265–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SEPA. Sea lice treatment chemicals for cage fish farms: provisional environmental quality standards for azamethiphos. In: Scottish Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/60020/policy_17-sea-lice-treatment-chemicals-for-cage-fish-farms.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2018.
  15. 15.
    Haya K, Burridge LE, Chang BD. Environmental impact of chemical wastes produced by the salmon aquaculture industry. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2001;58:492–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burridge LE, Haya K, Zitko V, Waddy S. The lethality of Salmosan (azamethiphos) to American lobster (Homarus americanus) larvae, postlarvae, and adults. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1999;43:165–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rodrıguez E, Barrio RJ, Goicolea A, de Balugera ZG. Determination of diflubenzuron and its main metabolites in forestry matrices by liquid chromatography with on-line diode-array and electrochemical detection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1999;384:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Commission Regulation (EU). No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off. J. Eur. Union L. 2010;15:1–72.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bordet F, Inthavong D, Fremy JM. Interlaboratory study of a multiresidue gas chromatographic method for determination of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides and polychlorobiphenyls in milk, fish, eggs, and beef fat. J. AOAC Int. 2002;85:1398–409.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jia F, Wang W, Wang J, Yin J, Liu Y, Liu Z. New strategy to enhance the extraction efficiency of pyrethroid pesticides in fish samples using a modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) method. Anal. Methods. 2012;4:449–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rawn DF, Judge J, Roscoe V. Application of the QuEChERS method for the analysis of pyrethrins and pyrethroids in fish tissues. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010;397:2525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen S, Yu X, He X, Xie D, Fan Y, Peng J. Simplified pesticide multiresidues analysis in fish by low-temperature cleanup and solid-phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2009;113:1297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chatterjee NS, Utture S, Banerjee K, Shabeer TA, Kamble N, Mathew S, et al. Multiresidue analysis of multiclass pesticides and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in fatty fish by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and evaluation of matrix effect. Food Chem. 2016;196:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Munaretto JS, Ferronato G, Ribeiro LC, Martins ML, Adaime MB, Zanella R. Development of a multiresidue method for the determination of endocrine disrupters in fish fillet using gas chromatography–triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2013;116:827–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valverde A, Aguilera A. Rodrı́guez M, Boulaid M. What are we determining using gas chromatographic multiresidue methods: tralomethrin or deltamethrin? J. Chromatogr. A. 2002;943:101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soler C, Manes J, Picó Y. Liquid chromatography–electrospray quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometry of nine pesticides in fruits. J. Chromatogr. A. 2004;1048:41–9.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martínez DB, Vázquez PP, Galera MM, García MG. Determination of pyrethroid insecticides in vegetables with liquid chromatography using detection by electrospray mass spectrometry. Chromatographia. 2006;63:487–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen T, Chen G. Identification and quantitation of pyrethroid pesticide residues in vegetables by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21:1848–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carneiro RP, Oliveira FA, Madureira FD, Silva G, de Souza WR, Lopes RP. Development and method validation for determination of 128 pesticides in bananas by modified QuEChERS and UHPLC–MS/MS analysis. Food Control. 2013;33:413–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chung SW, Lam CH. Development and validation of a method for determination of residues of 15 pyrethroids and two metabolites of dithiocarbamates in foods by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012;403:885–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim J, Suh JH, Cho HD, Kang W, Choi YS, Han SB. Analytical method for fast screening and confirmation of multi-class veterinary drug residues in fish and shrimp by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2016;33:420–32.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moloney M, Tuck S, Ramkumar A, Furey A, Danaher M. Determination of pyrethrin and pyrethroid residues in animal fat using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B. 2018;1077:60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Queiroz AG, da Silva BE, Druzian JI. Avaliação da qualidade nutricional em espécies de pescado mais produzidas no Estado da Bahia. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2009;29:721–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sapozhnikova Y, Lehotay SJ. Multi-class, multi-residue analysis of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel flame retardants in fish using fast, low-pressure gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013;758:80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Whelan M, Kinsella B, Furey A, Moloney M, Cantwell H, Lehotay SJ, et al. Determination of anthelmintic drug residues in milk using ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with rapid polarity switching. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:4612–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. SANTE/11813/2017. Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety; 2017.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    European Commission. 2002/657/EC. Commission Decision of 12th August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off. J. Eur. Communities L. 2002;221:1–36.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gosetti F, Mazzucco E, Zampieri D, Gennaro MC. Signal suppression/enhancement in high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:3929–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kinsella B, O’Mahony J, Malone E, Moloney M, Cantwell H, Furey A, et al. Current trends in sample preparation for growth promoter and veterinary drug residue analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2009;1216:7977–8015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jabeen F, Chaudhry AS, Manzoor S, Shaheen T. Examining pyrethroids, carbamates and neonicotenoids in fish, water and sediments from the Indus River for potential health risks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015;187:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Corcellas C, Eljarrat E, Barceló D. First report of pyrethroid bioaccumulation in wild river fish: a case study in Iberian river basins (Spain). Environ. Int. 2015;75:110–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dallegrave A, Pizzolato TM, Barreto F, Eljarrat E, Barceló D. Methodology for trace analysis of 17 pyrethroids and chlorpyrifos in foodstuff by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016;408:7689–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rübensam G, Barreto F, Hoff RB, Pizzolato TM. Determination of avermectin and milbemycin residues in bovine muscle by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and fluorescence detection using solvent extraction and low temperature cleanup. Food Control. 2013;29:55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xie J, Peng T, Zhu A, He J, Chang Q, Hu X, et al. Multi-residue analysis of veterinary drugs, pesticides and mycotoxins in dairy products by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry using low-temperature cleanup and solid phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. B. 2015;1002:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Active ingredient: deltamethrin and tralomethrin human health risk and assessment and mitigation documents and activities. https://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/whs/active_ingredient/deltamethrin_tralomethrin.htm. Accessed Dec 2018.
  46. 46.
    Mao J, Erstfeld KM, Fackler PH. Simultaneous determination of tralomethrin, deltamethrin, and related compounds by HPLC with radiometric detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993;41:596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenise Guimarães de Oliveira
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Abilasha Ramkumar
    • 1
  • Mary Moloney
    • 1
  • Márcia Helena Scherer Kurz
    • 2
  • Fábio Ferreira Gonçalves
    • 2
  • Osmar Damian Prestes
    • 3
  • Martin Danaher
    • 2
  1. 1.Food Safety DepartmentTeagasc Food Research CentreDublin 15Ireland
  2. 2.Laboratory for Analysis of Residues and Contaminants, Post-graduate Program in Technological and Environmental Chemistry, Chemistry and Food SchoolFederal University of Rio GrandeSanto Antônio da PatrulhaBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratory of Pesticides Residue Analysis, Chemistry DepartmentFederal University of Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil

Personalised recommendations