Abstract
Nucleic acid (NA) aptamers bind to their targets with high affinity and selectivity. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of aptamers play a major role in these non-covalent interactions. Here, we use a four-step approach to determine a true 3D structure of aptamers in solution using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular structure restoration (MSR). The approach consists of (i) acquiring SAXS experimental data of an aptamer in solution, (ii) building a spatial distribution of the molecule’s electron density using SAXS results, (iii) constructing a 3D model of the aptamer from its nucleotide primary sequence and secondary structure, and (iv) comparing and refining the modeled 3D structures with the experimental SAXS model. In the proof-of-principle we analyzed the 3D structure of RE31 aptamer to thrombin in a native free state at different temperatures and validated it by circular dichroism (CD). The resulting 3D structure of RE31 has the most energetically favorable conformation and the same elements such as a B-form duplex, non-complementary region, and two G-quartets which were previously reported by X-ray diffraction (XRD) from a single crystal. More broadly, this study demonstrates the complementary approach for constructing and adjusting the 3D structures of aptamers, DNAzymes, and ribozymes in solution, and could supply new opportunities for developing functional nucleic acids.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CD:
-
Circular dichroism
- Cryo-EM:
-
Cryogenic electron microscopy
- FRET:
-
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer
- MSR:
-
Molecular structure restoration
- NMR:
-
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- SAXS:
-
Small-angle X-ray scattering
- XRD:
-
X-ray diffraction
References
Mascini M, Palchetti I, Tombelli S. Nucleic acid and peptide aptamers: fundamentals and bioanalytical aspects. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51(6):1316–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201006630.
Hermann T, Patel DJ. Adaptive recognition by nucleic acid aptamers. Science. 2000;287(5454):820–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5454.820.
Labib M, Zamay AS, Kolovskaya OS, Reshetneva IT, Zamay GS, Kibbee RJ, et al. Aptamer-based impedimetric sensor for bacterial typing. Anal Chem. 2012;84(19):8114–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac302217u.
Labib M, Zamay AS, Kolovskaya OS, Reshetneva IT, Zamay GS, Kibbee RJ, et al. Aptamer-based viability impedimetric sensor for bacteria. Anal Chem. 2012;84(21):8966–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac302902s.
Liu J, Cao Z, Lu Y. Functional nucleic acid sensors. Chem Rev. 2009;109(5):1948–98. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030183i.
Pang X, Cui C, Wan S, Jiang Y, Zhang L, Xia L, et al. Bioapplications of cell-SELEX-generated aptamers in cancer diagnostics, therapeutics, theranostics and biomarker discovery: a comprehensive review. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10020047.
Zhang J, Liu B, Liu H, Zhang X, Tan W. Aptamer-conjugated gold nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013;8(6):983–93. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.13.80.
Zhou W, Huang PJ, Ding J, Liu J. Aptamer-based biosensors for biomedical diagnostics. Analyst. 2014;139(11):2627–40. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4an00132j.
Zimbres FM, Tarnok A, Ulrich H, Wrenger C. Aptamers: novel molecules as diagnostic markers in bacterial and viral infections? Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:731516. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/731516.
Keefe AD, Pai S, Ellington A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(7):537–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3141.
Kruspe S, Mittelberger F, Szameit K, Hahn U. Aptamers as drug delivery vehicles. ChemMedChem. 2014;9(9):1998–2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201402163.
Sun H, Zhu X, Lu PY, Rosato RR, Tan W, Zu Y. Oligonucleotide aptamers: new tools for targeted cancer therapy. Molecular Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3:e182. https://doi.org/10.1038/mtna.2014.32.
Kennard O, Hunter WN. Oligonucleotide structure: a decade of results from single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Q Rev Biophys. 1989;22(3):327–79.
Adrian M, Heddi B, Phan AT. NMR spectroscopy of G-quadruplexes. Methods. 2012;57(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.05.003.
Kyogoku Y. NMR studies on structure and interaction of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 1995;40(3):327–39.
Mao X, Marky LA, Gmeiner WH. NMR structure of the thrombin-binding DNA aptamer stabilized by Sr2+. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2004;22(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2004.10506977.
van Buuren BN, Schleucher J, Wittmann V, Griesinger C, Schwalbe H, Wijmenga SS. NMR spectroscopic determination of the solution structure of a branched nucleic acid from residual dipolar couplings by using isotopically labeled nucleotides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004;43(2):187–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200351632.
van der Werf RM, Tessari M, Wijmenga SS. Nucleic acid helix structure determination from NMR proton chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR. 2013;56(2):95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9725-y.
Leupin W, Wagner G, Denny WA, Wuthrich K. Assignment of the 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of a short DNA-duplex with 1H-detected two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15(1):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/15.1.267.
Hammel M. Validation of macromolecular flexibility in solution by small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). Eur Biophys J. 2012;41(10):789–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-012-0820-x.
Rambo RP, Tainer JA. Super-resolution in solution x-ray scattering and its applications to structural systems biology. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:415–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130301.
Vieville JM, Barluenga S, Winssinger N, Delsuc MA. Duplex formation and secondary structure of gamma-PNA observed by NMR and CD. Biophys Chem. 2016;210:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2015.09.002.
Preus S, Wilhelmsson LM. Advances in quantitative FRET-based methods for studying nucleic acids. Chembiochem. 2012;13(14):1990–2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201200400.
Bai XC, Martin TG, Scheres SH, Dietz H. Cryo-EM structure of a 3D DNA-origami object. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(49):20012–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215713109.
Martin TG, Bharat TA, Joerger AC, Bai XC, Praetorius F, Fersht AR, et al. Design of a molecular support for cryo-EM structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(47):E7456–E63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612720113.
Nunn CM, Van Meervelt L, Zhang SD, Moore MH, Kennard O. DNA-drug interactions. The crystal structures of d(TGTACA) and d(TGATCA) complexed with daunomycin. J Mol Biol. 1991;222(2):167–77.
Ruigrok VJ, Levisson M, Hekelaar J, Smidt H, Dijkstra BW, van der Oost J. Characterization of aptamer-protein complexes by x-ray crystallography and alternative approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(8):10537–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms130810537.
Bood M, Sarangamath S, Wranne MS, Grotli M, Wilhelmsson LM. Fluorescent nucleobase analogues for base-base FRET in nucleic acids: synthesis, photophysics and applications. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2018;14:114–29. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.14.7.
Paramasivan S, Rujan I, Bolton PH. Circular dichroism of quadruplex DNAs: applications to structure, cation effects and ligand binding. Methods. 2007;43(4):324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.02.009.
Orlova EV, Saibil HR. Structural analysis of macromolecular assemblies by electron microscopy. Chem Rev. 2011;111(12):7710–48. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100353t.
Jeffries CM, Graewert MA, Blanchet CE, Langley DB, Whitten AE, Svergun DI. Preparing monodisperse macromolecular samples for successful biological small-angle x-ray and neutron-scattering experiments. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(11):2122–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.113.
Guinier A. L'esprit de la recherche aux U. S. A. Atomes. 1947;2(20):378–82.
Timasheff SN, Witz J, Luzzati V. The structure of high molecular weight ribonucleic acid in solution. A smallangle x-ray scattering study. Biophys J. 1961;1:525–37.
Petoukhov MV, Franke D, Shkumatov AV, Tria G, Kikhney AG, Gajda M, et al. New developments in the ATSAS program package for small-angle scattering data analysis. J Appl Crystallogr. 2012;45(Pt 2):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812007662.
Svergun D, Barberato C, Koch MHJ. CRYSOL - a program to evaluate x-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J Appl Crystallogr. 1995;28(6):768–73. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895007047.
Stewart JJP. MOPAC2016. Stewart Computational Chemistry, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. http://openmopac.net/MOPAC2016.html. 2016
Svergun DI. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J Appl Crystallogr. 1992;25(4):495–503. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892001663.
Svergun DI. Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing. Biophys J. 1999;76(6):2879–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77443-6.
Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, Hutchison GR. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminform. 2012;4(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17.
Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3406–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg595.
Ikebukuro K, Okumura Y, Sumikura K, Karube I. A novel method of screening thrombin-inhibiting DNA aptamers using an evolution-mimicking algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(12):e108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gni108.
Macaya RF, Waldron JA, Beutel BA, Gao H, Joesten ME, Yang M, et al. Structural and functional characterization of potent antithrombotic oligonucleotides possessing both quadruplex and duplex motifs. Biochemistry. 1995;34(13):4478–92.
Padmanabhan K, Tulinsky A. An ambiguous structure of a DNA 15-mer thrombin complex. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1996;52(Pt 2):272–82. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444995013977.
Russo Krauss I, Merlino A, Giancola C, Randazzo A, Mazzarella L, Sica F. Thrombin-aptamer recognition: a revealed ambiguity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(17):7858–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr522.
Russo Krauss I, Merlino A, Randazzo A, Novellino E, Mazzarella L, Sica F. High-resolution structures of two complexes between thrombin and thrombin-binding aptamer shed light on the role of cations in the aptamer inhibitory activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(16):8119–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks512.
Spiridonova VA, Barinova KV, Glinkina KA, Melnichuk AV, Gainutdynov AA, Safenkova IV, et al. A family of DNA aptamers with varied duplex region length that forms complexes with thrombin and prothrombin. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(16):2043–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.020.
Werner A, Konarev PV, Svergun DI, Hahn U. Characterization of a fluorophore binding RNA aptamer by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and small angle x-ray scattering. Anal Biochem. 2009;389(1):52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.03.018.
Baird NJ, Ferre-D'Amare AR. Analysis of riboswitch structure and ligand binding using small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1103:211–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-730-3_16.
Mittelberger F, Meyer C, Waetzig GH, Zacharias M, Valentini E, Svergun DI, et al. RAID3–an interleukin-6 receptor-binding aptamer with post-selective modification-resistant affinity. RNA Biol. 2015;12(9):1043–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2015.1079681.
Reinstein O, Neves MA, Saad M, Boodram SN, Lombardo S, Beckham SA, et al. Engineering a structure switching mechanism into a steroid-binding aptamer and hydrodynamic analysis of the ligand binding mechanism. Biochemistry. 2011;50(43):9368–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201361v.
Ruigrok VJ, van Duijn E, Barendregt A, Dyer K, Tainer JA, Stoltenburg R, et al. Kinetic and stoichiometric characterisation of streptavidin-binding aptamers. Chembiochem. 2012;13(6):829–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201100774.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to Ana Gargaun for English grammar correction. This work was funded in parts by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation; project 0287-2019-0007 the Council of the President of the Russian Federation for Support of Young Scientists and Leading Scientific Schools (project no. SP-938.2015.5) and the grant of KSAI “Krasnoyarsk Regional Fund of Supporting Scientific and Technological Activities” for M.P., the internship “The study of the stacking of the secondary structure of DNA aptamers to thrombin” for R.M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.N. Zabluda, S.S. Zamay, S.G. Ovchinnikov created an idea, designed the overall concept, supervised the work. R. Moryachkov, M. Platunov, G. Peters, V.N. Zabluda, A. Melnichuk performed SAXS experiments, F.N. Tomilin, I. Shchugoreva, S.G. Ovchinnikov, A. Sokolov perform modeling, V. Spiridonova, A. Melnichuk, A. Atrokhova performed circular dichroic spectrum analysis and UV-melting, F.N. Tomilin, S.S. Zamay, G.S. Zamay, T.N. Zamay, M.V. Berezovski, R. Moryachkov, M. Platunov, A.S. Kichkailo analyzed all data and wrote the paper. All authors provided intellectual input, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 391 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomilin, F.N., Moryachkov, R., Shchugoreva, I. et al. Four steps for revealing and adjusting the 3D structure of aptamers in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering and computer simulation. Anal Bioanal Chem 411, 6723–6732 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02045-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02045-0