Enhancing coverage in LC–MS-based untargeted metabolomics by a new sample preparation procedure using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction and two derivatizations
It is a challenge to expand the metabolome coverage of liquid chromatography (LC)–electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) based untargeted metabolomics analysis. The limited coverage is attributed to the weak signal of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in ESI-MS and the limited capacity of LC separation for metabolites with a wide range of polarities. Here a new sample preparation procedure is proposed to solve these problems. Mixed-mode (reversed-phase and anion-exchange) solid-phase extraction sorbents were used to separate metabolites into hydrophilic amine, hydrophobic amine/alcohol, and organic acid groups. Then, alcohols and carboxylic acids in separated groups were tagged with pyridine with use of two derivatization systems for signal enhancement. Finally, hydrophilic amines were analyzed by LC–MS with a hydrophilic interaction LC column, and the two hydrophobic compound groups were analyzed by LC–MS with a C18 column. From the results for standard samples, the detection limits of the new method are lower than those of the classic solvent extraction–protein precipitation method by 3.3–70 times for five amino acids and by 65–1141 times for five fatty acids. Moreover, the detection limit of this new method is 125 ng mL-1 for cholesterol, which has no signal with the classic method even at 10 μg mL-1. In seminal plasma samples, 110 more metabolites were identified by this new method than by the traditional solvent extraction–protein precipitation method in positive-mode ESI (new method vs traditional method, 65 vs 22 identified by comparing MS/MS spectra with those of standards, 203 vs 136 identified by searching MS spectra in a published database). Among them, 53 carboxylic acids and 21 alcohols were identified only by the new method, and more hydrophilic amine metabolites, such as amino acids and nucleosides, were identified by the new method than by the classic method. Finally, in application to the study of male infertility, more potential biomarkers of oligoasthenoteratospermic infertility were found with the new method (46 potential biomarkers) than with the classic method (19 potential biomarkers) and previously reported methods (10–30 potential biomarkers). Thus, it is demonstrated that this new sample preparation method expands the detection coverage of LC–MS-based untargeted metabolomics methods and has application potential in biological research.
KeywordsUntargeted metabolomics Detection coverage Mixed-mode solid-phase extraction Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Infertility study
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos 21804142, 21873116, 21675174, and 81774322). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agency.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
- 10.Huang T, Toro M, Lee R, Hui DS, Edwards JL. Multi-functional derivatization of amine, hydroxyl, and carboxylate groups for metabolomic investigations of human tissue by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2018;143(14):3408–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AN00490K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Yamashita K, Miyashiro Y, Maekubo H, Okuyama M, Honma S, Takahashi M, et al. Development of highly sensitive quantification method for testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in human serum and prostate tissue by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Steroids. 2009;74(12):920–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2009.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Astarita G. New frontiers for mass spectrometry in lipidomics, part II. LC GC North Am. 2012;30(6):482.Google Scholar
- 16.Contrepois K, Jiang L, Snyder M. Optimized analytical procedures for the untargeted metabolomic profiling of human urine and plasma by combining hydrophilic interaction (HILIC) and reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC)–mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(6):1684–95. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M114.046508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Bi H, Krausz KW, Manna SK, Li F, Johnson CH, Gonzalez FJ. Optimization of harvesting, extraction, and analytical protocols for UPLC-ESI-MS-based metabolomic analysis of adherent mammalian cancer cells. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(15):5279–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6927-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.David A, Abdul-Sada A, Lange A, Tyler CR, Hill EM. A new approach for plasma (xeno)metabolomics based on solid-phase extraction and nanoflow liquid chromatography-nanoelectrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1365:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Cha E, Lee KM, Park KD, Park KS, Lee K-W, Kim S-M, et al. Hydroxycholesterol levels in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neuromyelitis optica revealed by LC-Ag+CIS/MS/MS and LC-ESI/MS/MS with picolinic derivatization: increased levels and association with disability during acute attack. PLoS One. 2016;11(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167819.
- 30.Wu Q, Comi TJ, Li B, Rubakhin SS, Sweedler JV. On-tissue derivatization via electrospray deposition for matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous fatty acids in rat brain tissues. Anal Chem. 2016;88(11):5988–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A, Oresic M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(395). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-395.
- 37.H-x W, Wang B, Zhou Y, Q-w J. Rapid and sensitive analysis of phthalate metabolites, bisphenol A, and endogenous steroid hormones in human urine by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction, dansylation, and ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(12):4313–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6779-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Jayaraman V, Ghosh S, Sengupta A, Srivastava S, Sonawat HM, Narayan PK. Identification of biochemical differences between different forms of male infertility by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(9):1195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0282-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Gilany K, Mani-Varnosfaderani A, Minai-Tehrani A, Mirzajani F, Ghassempour A, Sadeghi MR, et al. Untargeted metabolomic profiling of seminal plasma in nonobstructive azoospermia men: a noninvasive detection of spermatogenesis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2017;31(8):e3931. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.3931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Kohengkul S, Tanphaichitr V, Muangmun V, Tanphaichitr N. Levels of L-carnitine and L-O-acetylcarnitine in normal and infertile human semen: a lower level of L-O-acetylcarnitine in infertile semen. Fertil Steril. 1977;28(12):1333–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)42979-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar