Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 13, pp 2915–2924 | Cite as

T4 DNA polymerase-assisted upgrade of a nicking/polymerization amplification strategy for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Watermelon mosaic virus

  • Ying Wang
  • Binxiao Li
  • Jing Liu
  • Hong ZhouEmail author
Research Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

An upgraded nicking/polymerization strategy for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) is proposed on the basis of the exonuclease and polymerase activity of T4 DNA polymerase and Mg2+-dependent DNAzyme-assisted and hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme-assisted cascade amplification strategies. Briefly, the hybridized DNA of the target WMV sequence, HP1, and P1 was recognized and nicked by nicking endonuclease Nb.BbvCI, and two DNA segments (P1-25 and P1-6) were produced. P1-25 was digested in the 3′→5′ direction, and digestion was halted at the 3′-terminal G locus with the exonuclease activity of T4 DNA polymerase. When dNTP solution mix was added to the mixture, an intact enzymatic sequence of Mg2+-dependent DNAzyme was synthesized by T4 DNA polymerase, which hybridized with its substrate sequence in the loop segment of HP2 immobilized on a gold electrode and initiated the cleavage round. The caged G-quadruplex sequence was released and formed hemin/G-quadruplex-based DNAzyme, resulting in sharply increased electrochemical signals. A correlation between the differential pulse voltammetry signal and the concentration of target WMV sequence was obtained in the range from 50 fM to 1 nM, with 50 fM detection limit. Because the nicking and polymerization reactions are irreversible and share the same buffer, the cascade amplification strategy is an ultrasensitive and high-efficiency strategy, indicating potential for viral detection.

Graphical abstract

An upgrade nicking/polymerization strategy for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) was proposed based on DNAzyme-assistant cascade amplification strategies.

Keywords

Biosensors Watermelon mosaic virus Electrochemical detection Exonucleolysis and polymerization T4 DNA polymerase Cascade amplification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21675074 and 31701760) and the Shandong Provincial Major Application Technology Innovation Project.

Compliance with ethical standards

This research did not involve any human participants or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmelzer K. Demonstration of the watermelon mosaic virus in imported watermelons and their possible significance as virus sources. Zentralblatt Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infekt Hyg. 1965;119(2):130–2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajbanshi N, Ali A. First complete genome sequence of a watermelon mosaic virus isolated from watermelon in the United States. Genome Announc. 2016;4(2):e00299–16.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00299-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark MF, Adams AN. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol. 1977;34(3):475–83.  https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Purcifull DE, Edwardson JR. Watermelon mosaic virus: tubular inclusions in pumpkin leaves and aggregates in leaf extracts. Virology. 1967;32(3):393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Regenmortel M. Zone electrophoresis and electron microscopy of a watermelon mosaic virus from South Africa. Virology. 1960;12:127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988;239(4839):487–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez-Jimena B, Bekaert M, Bakheit M, Frischmann S, Patel P, Simon-Loriere E, et al. Development and validation of four one-step real-time RT-LAMP assays for specific detection of each dengue virus serotype. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(5):e0006381.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Babamiri B, Hallaj R, Salimi A. Solid surface fluorescence immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen using PAMAM/CdTe@CdS QDs nanoclusters. Methods Appl Fluoresc. 2018;6(3):035013.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/aac8f7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pang Y, Rong Z, Wang J, Xiao R, Wang S. A fluorescent aptasensor for H5N1 influenza virus detection based-on the core-shell nanoparticles metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF). Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;66:527–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song JZ, Mauk MG, Hackett BA, Cherry S, Bau HH, Liu CC. Instrument-free point-of-care molecular detection of Zika virus. Anal Chem. 2016;88(14):7289–94.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu J, Cui M, Zhou H, Zhang S. Efficient double-quenching of electrochemiluminescence from CdS:Eu QDs by hemin-graphene-Au nanorods ternary composite for ultrasensitive immunoassay. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30577.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu LL, Wang XY, Ma Q, Lin ZH, Chen SF, Li Y, et al. Multiplex electrochemiluminescence DNA sensor for determination of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus based on multicolor quantum dots and Au nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;916:92–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shao K, Zhang CJ, Ye SY, Cai K, Wu L, Wang BR, et al. Near-infrared electrochemiluminesence biosensor for high sensitive detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus based on cyclodextrin-grafted porous Au/PtAu nanotube. Sens Actuators B. 2017;240:586–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou H, Han T, Wei Q, Zhang S. Efficient enhancement of electrochemiluminescence from cadmium sulfide quantum dots by glucose oxidase mimicking gold nanoparticles for highly sensitive assay of methyltransferase. Anal Chem. 2016;88(5):2976–83.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ly TN, Park S, Park SJ. Detection of HIV-1 antigen by quartz crystal microbalance using gold nanoparticles. Sens Actuators B. 2016;237:452–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ashiba H, Sugiyama Y, Wang XM, Shirato H, Higo-Moriguchi K, Taniguchi K, et al. Detection of norovirus virus-like particles using a surface plasmon resonance-assisted fluoroimmunosensor optimized for quantum dot fluorescent labels. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;93:260–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong CL, Chua M, Mittman H, Choo LX, Lim HQ, Olivo M. A phase-intensity surface plasmon resonance biosensor for avian influenza A (H5N1) detection. Sensors. 2017;17(10):2363.  https://doi.org/10.3390/S17102363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang Y, Tan CY, Tan SY, Wong MSF, Chen YF, Zhang L, et al. SAW sensor for influenza A virus detection enabled with efficient surface functionalization. Sens Actuators B. 2015;209:78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alizadeh N, Hallaj R, Salimi A. A highly sensitive electrochemical immunosensor for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection based on Hemin/G-quadruplex horseradish peroxidase-mimicking DNAzyme-signal amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;94:184–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.02.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu J, Cui M, Niu L, Zhou H, Zhang S. Enhanced peroxidase-like properties of graphene-hemin-composite decorated with Au nanoflowers as electrochemical aptamer biosensor for the detection of K562 leukemia cancer cells. Chem Eur J. 2016;22(50):18001–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201604354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu J, Xin X, Zhou H, Zhang S. A ternary composite based on graphene, hemin, and gold nanorods with high catalytic activity for the detection of cell-surface glycan expression. Chem Eur J. 2015;21(5):1908–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201404557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu J, Zhou H, Xu J, Chen H. Switchable ‘on–off–on’ electrochemical technique for direct detection of survivin mRNA in living cells. Analyst. 2012;137(17):3940–5.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2an35463b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teengam P, Siangproh W, Tuantranont A, Henry CS, Vilaivan T, Chailapakul O. Electrochemical paper-based peptide nucleic acid biosensor for detecting human papillomavirus. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;952:32–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.11.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu Y, Chen Z, Jian W, Sun D, Zhang B, Li X, et al. Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus DNA based on isothermal exponential amplification coupled with hybridization chain reaction of DNAzyme nanowires. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;64:566–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weizmann Y, Beissenhirtz MK, Cheglakov Z, Nowarski R, Kotler M, Willner I. A virus spotlighted by an autonomous DNA machine. Angew Chem. 2006;45(44):7384–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xuan F, Luo X, Hsing IM. Conformation-dependent exonuclease III activity mediated by metal ions reshuffling on thymine-rich DNA duplexes for an ultrasensitive electrochemical method for Hg2+ detection. Anal Chem. 2013;85(9):4586–93.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac400228q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pan W, Zhang T, Yang H, Diao W, Li N, Tang B. Multiplexed detection and imaging of intracellular mRNAs using a four-color nanoprobe. Anal Chem. 2013;85(21):10581–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac402700s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hun X, Liu F, Mei Z, Ma L, Wang Z, Luo X. Signal amplified strategy based on target-induced strand release coupling cleavage of nicking endonuclease for the ultrasensitive detection of ochratoxin A. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;39(1):145–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi C, Liu Q, Ma C, Zhong W. Exponential strand-displacement amplification for detection of microRNAs. Anal Chem. 2014;86(1):336–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4038043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu J, Cui M, Zhou H, Yang W. DNAzyme Based Nanomachine for in situ detection of microRNA in living cells. ACS Sens. 2017;2(12):1847–53.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li B, Liu J, Zhou H. Amplified fluorescence detection of serum prostate specific antigen based on metal-dependent DNAzyme assistant nanomachine. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1008:96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.12.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou H, Liu J, Xu J, Zhang S, Chen H. Optical nano-biosensing interface via nucleic acid amplification strategy: construction and application. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(6):1996–2019.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00573C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qu X, Jin H, Liu Y, Sun Q. Strand displacement amplification reaction on quantum dot-encoded silica bead for visual detection of multiplex microRNAs. Anal Chem. 2018;90(5):3482–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phillips EA, Moehling TJ, Bhadra S, Ellington AD, Linnes JC. Strand displacement probes combined with isothermal nucleic acid amplification for instrument-free detection from complex samples. Anal Chem. 2018;90(11):6580–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yin BC, Liu YQ, Ye BC. Sensitive detection of microRNA in complex biological samples via enzymatic signal amplification using DNA polymerase coupled with nicking endonuclease. Anal Chem. 2013;85(23):11487–93.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403302a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun Y, Sun Y, Tian W, Liu C, Gao K, Li Z. A novel restriction endonuclease GlaI for rapid and highly sensitive detection of DNA methylation coupled with isothermal exponential amplification reaction. Chem Sci. 2018;9(5):1344–51.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04975g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goulian M, Lucas ZJ, Kornberg A. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. XXV. Purification and properties of deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase induced by infection with phage T4. J Biol Chem. 1968;243(3):627–38.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Englund PT. Analysis of nucleotide sequences at 3' termini of duplex deoxyribonucleic acid with the use of the T4 deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase. J Biol Chem. 1971;246(10):3269–76.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang Y, Li BX, Liu J, Zhou H. Electrochemical monitoring of single nucleotide polymorphisms of rice varieties related to blast resistance based on PCR product and T4 DNA polymerase. Sens Actuators B. 2018;273:649–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Bai J, Huo B, Yuan S, Zhang M, Sun X, et al. Upconversion fluorescent aptasensor for polychlorinated biphenyls detection based on nicking endonuclease and hybridization chain reaction dual-amplification strategy. Anal Chem. 2018;90(16):9936–42.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang J, Li XY, Du YC, Zhang LN, Liu KK, Zhu LN, et al. Sensitive fluorescent detection of DNA methyltransferase using nicking endonuclease-mediated multiple primers-like rolling circle amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;91:417–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhou CH, Shu Y, Hong ZY, Pang DW, Zhang ZL. Electrochemical magnetoimmunosensing approach for the sensitive detection of H9N2 avian influenza virus particles. Chem Asian J. 2013;8(9):2220–6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201300521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Singhal C, Pundir CS, Narang J. A genosensor for detection of consensus DNA sequence of Dengue virus using ZnO/Pt-Pd nanocomposites. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;97:75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Carinelli S, Kuhnemund M, Nilsson M, Pividori MI. Yoctomole electrochemical genosensing of Ebola virus cDNA by rolling circle and circle to circle amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;93:65–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Low SS, Loh HS, Boey JS, Khiew PS, Chiu WS, Tan MTT. Sensitivity enhancement of graphene/zinc oxide nanocomposite-based electrochemical impedance genosensor for single stranded RNA detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;94:365–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.02.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jiao K, Sun W, Zhang SS. Sensitive detection of a plant virus by electrochemical enzyme-linked immunoassay. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2000;367(7):667–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160000423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Tumor Markers, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Life ScienceLinyi UniversityLinyiChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Functionalized Probes for Chemical Imaging in Shandong Normal UniversityShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations