Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 2, pp 449–457 | Cite as

Analysis of corticosteroids in samples of animal origin using QuEChERS and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry

  • Iñaki Beguiristain
  • Angelina Alongi
  • Antoni Rúbies
  • Mercè Granados
Research Paper

Abstract

A rapid and sensitive method for the confirmatory analysis of eight synthetic corticosteroids (betamethasone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, 6-methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, flumethasone, beclomethasone, fluocinolone acetonide) is proposed. The method is useful for detecting illegal treatments in different animal species. It consists of an extraction and cleanup using the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) strategy. Quantitative determination is achieved by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry with heated electrospray ionization in negative mode. Quantification is performed using surrogate matrix-matched standard calibration curve with dexamethasone-D4 as the internal standard. The method was validated for analyzing liver samples according to the criteria established by Decision 2002/657/EC. Linearity was assessed in the 1–10 μg kg−1 range and linear correlation coefficients were over 0.99 for all the analytes. CCα ranged from 0.04 to 0.16 μg kg−1 for substances without maximum residue limit. The method allows confident quantification and confirmation of corticosteroids in liver samples, and its simplicity makes it suitable for analyzing large numbers of samples.

Keywords

Synthetic corticosteroids Liquid chromatography High-resolution mass spectrometry Orbitrap Food analysis Liver 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jana Portabella for her cooperation in the method development.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Martindale W. The extra pharmacopoeia. J.E.F. Reynolds, editors. 31st ed. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller WL, Auchus RJ. The molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology of human steroidogenesis and its disorders. Endocr Rev. 2016;32(1):81–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quanson JL, Stander MA, Pretorius E, Jenkinson C, Taylor AE, Storbeck KH. High-throughput analysis of 19 endogenous androgenic steroids by ultra-performance convergence chromatography tandem masss spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2016;1031:131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soma LR, Uboh CE, Liu Y, Li X, Robinson MA, Boston RC, et al. Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone following intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular and oral administration in horses and its effects on endogenous hydrocortisone. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2013;36:181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richelmi GB, Pezzolato RC, Botta M, Varello K, Pitardi D, Baioni E, et al. Thymus atrophy is an efficient marker of illicit treatment with dexamethasone in veal calves: results from a triennial experimental study. Res Vet Sci. 2017;113:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitra R. Adverse effects of corticosteroids on bone metabolim: a review. A A J Phys Med Rehab. 2011;3:466–71.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vicenti M, Girolami F, Capra P, Pazza M, Carletti M, Gardini G, et al. Study of dexamethasone urinary excretion profile in cattle by LC-MS/MS: comparison between therapeutic and growth-promoting administration. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:1299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deceuninck Y, Bichon E, Monteau F, Antignac JP, Le Bizec B. Determination of MRL regulated corticosteroids in liver from various species using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC). Anal Chim Acta. 2011;632:137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt KS, Stachel CS. In-house validation and factorial effect analysis of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of corticosteroids in bovine and porcine muscle tissue. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405:6287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Council of the European Union. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC. Off J Eur Comm. 1996;L125: 10–32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) Nr. 37/2010, on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off J Eur Union. 2010;L15:1–72.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 laying down community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off J Eur Union 2009;L152: 11–22.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrero P, Cortés-Francisco N, Borrull F, Caixach J, Pocurull E, Marcé RM. Comparison of triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry in ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of veterinary drugs in sewage: benefits and drawbacks. J Mass Spectrom. 2014;49:585–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar P, Rúbies A, Centrich F, Granados M, Cortés-Francisco N, Caixach J, et al. Targeted analysis with benchtop quadrupole-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer: application to determination of synthetic hormones in animal urine. Anal Chim Acta. 2013;780:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaufmann A, Butcher P, Maden K, Walker S, Widmer M. Reliability of veterinary drug residue confirmation: high resolution mass spectrometry versus tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;856:54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    León N, Roca M, Igualada C, Martins CPB, Pastor A, Yusá V. Wide-range screening of banned veterinary drugs in urine by ultra-high liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1258:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Clercq N, Van den Bussche J, Croubel S, Delahaut P, Vanhaecke L. Development and validation of a high-resolution mass-spectrometry based method to study the long-term stability of natural and synthetic corticosteroids in faeces. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1336:76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fidani M, Pompa G, Mungiguerra F, Casati A, Fracchiolla ML, Arioli F. Investigation of the presence of endogenous prednisolone in equine urine by high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and high resolution mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2012;26:879–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Delahaut P, Demoulin L, Gillard N, Fichant E, Courtheyn D. Preliminary study on the presence of prednisolone in porcine urine and liver—how to distinguish endogenous from therapeutically administered prednisolone. Drug Test Anal. 2014;6:325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dusi G, Gasparini M, Curatolo M, Assini W, Bozzoni E, Tognoli N, et al. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of nine corticosteroid residues in bovine liver samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;700:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tölgyesi A, Sharma VK, Fekete J. Development and validation of a method for determination of corticosteroids in pig fat using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2011;879:403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deceuninck Y, Bichon E, Monteau F, Dervilly-Pinel G, Antignac JP, Le Bizec B. Fast and multiresidue determination of twenty glucocorticoids in bovine milk using ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1294:76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tölgyesi A, Tölgyesi L, Sharma VK, Sohn M, Fekete J. Quantitative determination of corticosteroids in bovine milk using mixed-mode polymeric strong cation exchange solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;53:919–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int. 2003;86:412–43.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park KH, Choi JH, Abd El-Aty AM, Cho SK, Park JK, Kwon KS, et al. Development of QuEChERS-based extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying flumethasone residues in beef muscle. Meat Sci. 2012;92:749–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    European Commission. Commission Decision (EU) 657 of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Comm. 2002;L221:8–36.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    SANCO. Conclusion of the meeting on the interpretation of the implementation of decision 2002/657/EC. Standing Committee of the food Chain and Animal Health, 16 November 2004. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/cs_vet-med-residues_cons_2004-2726rev4_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  28. 28.
    Chen D, Tao Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Huang L, Yuan Z. Development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of glucocorticoid residues in edible tissues of swine, cattle, sheep, and chicken. Food Addit Contam. 2010;27(10):1363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noh E, Yoon CY, Lee JH, Baek SY, Oh HB, Do JA. A liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF-MS) study for analyzing 35 corticosteroid compounds: elucidation of MS/MS fragmentation pathways. Bull Kor Chem Soc. 2016;37:1029–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chiesa L, Panseri S, Pavlovic R, Cannizzo FT, Biolatti BB, Divari S, et al. HPLC-ESI-MS/MS assessment of the tetrahydrometabolites of cortisol and cortisone in bovine urine: promising markers of dexamethasone and prednisolone treatment. Food Addit Contam A. 2016;33:1175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rúbies A, Antkowiak S, Granados M, Companyó R, Centrich F. Determination of avermectins: a QuEChERS approach to the analysis of food samples. Food Chem. 2015;181:57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rúbies A, Guo L, Centrich F, Granados M. Analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in milk using QuEChERS and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry: triple quadrupole versus Q-Orbitrap mass analyzers. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:5769–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11843-2. Capability of detection. Part 2: methodology in the linear calibration case. 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department d’Enginyeria Química i Química AnalíticaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratori de l’Agència de Salut Pública de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della SiciliaPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations