Advertisement

ABC Spotlight on magnetic composite nanoparticles in analysis: increased sensitivity at decreased analysis time

  • Peter A. Lieberzeit
Editorial
  • 140 Downloads
Analytical chemistry continuously pushes toward decreasing detection limits to meet the requirements in such diverse fields as, e.g., diagnostics, environmental analysis, and process control. This leads to fundamental consequences both for instrumental, laboratory-based analytics, and sensors/assays:
  • Virtually, any protocol in instrumental analysis requires sample preparation for multiple purposes: These include pre-concentrating target species, separating them from their matrix, and transferring them into solvent systems that are compatible with further analysis steps.

  • Sensors and arrays face a slightly different challenge: Even if they are inherently highly sensitive, one has to make sure that sufficient numbers of target molecules meet the sensitive area within a realistic time frame.

Solid phase (micro) extraction SP(M)E has successfully tackled these issues and fundamentally improved the analytical process. Nonetheless, rapid progress in synthesizing tailor-made nanoparticles has opened up unprecedented opportunities for improving it. Among these, functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) have attracted special interest and made way for a range of novel application scenarios. This has been driven by their ferromagnetism, which allows for separating them from sample solutions by applying external magnetic fields. The beauty of the approach lies in the fact that magnetic fields usually do not affect any species present in the sample and thus are also compatible with biological matrices.

Such advantages seem less obvious when utilizing modified nanoparticles to pre-concentrate samples prior to separation and analysis. Nonetheless, the last 2 years saw several approaches published in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, such as a system for pre-concentrating endocrine-disrupting compounds from water [1], or estrogenic compounds from milk [2], extracting Bisphenol A from human serum [3], or a MNP-based method for determining di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in aqueous solutions [4]. Figure 1 shows the general approach: First, suitably functionalized Fe3O4 (magnetite) nanoparticles are added to samples. After stirring/agitating, those particles are collected by an external magnet followed by washing steps and re-solubilization of the respective analyte(s) prior to analysis. Compared to “classical” SPME that uses (functionalized) cartridges, MNPs allow for much faster analysis: Distributing them in the sample matrix and agitating them there substantially increases the probability that a particle meets its target analyte. The idea therefore is bringing the analytical “device”—the nanoparticle extraction medium—to the sample analyte, rather than the other way round: Whereas two of the papers exposed the samples (around 100 ml) to the particles for a few hours [3, 4], the other two report incubation times of 0.5–2 min for sample sizes of 1.5 and 20 ml, respectively.
Fig. 1

General approach for utilizing MNPs in sample preparation [3]. Reprinted with permission, © Springer Nature, 2018

These examples also highlight the use of a variety of functionalization strategies to achieve selectivity, namely modification with sodium oleate [1], coating with poly-dopamine [2], with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) [4], and aptamers [3], respectively. They cover the entire range from broad-band affinity to high selectivity during extraction. Among selective functionalization methods, molecular imprinting has attracted considerable attention (see for instance [4, 5, 6]), because it allows for generically designing polymer matrices with tailor-made selectivity. Kong et al. [7] even succeeded in generating a multi-selective matrix: Instead of utilizing their target analyte for imprinting—which would be the “standard” way of doing MIP—2,4-diamino-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine served as a so-called pseudo-template. This allowed them to synthesize multi-selective particles for enriching melamine (MEL), cyromazine (CYR), triamterene (TAT), diaveridine (DVD), and trimethoprim (TME) with the same particles to analyze them by HPLC-MS.

As previously mentioned, MNPs have also played an important role in developing sensors and assays. In these cases, MNPs are usually fully integrated into the sensing protocols. For instance, Che et al. [8] published an assay utilizing MNPs for magnetically enriching pathogenic bacteria prior to fluorescence analysis. They modified SiO2@Fe3O4 MNPs with aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), a well-established strategy to functionalize particle surfaces with –NH2 groups. The resulting particles were 90–105 nm in diameter and inherently affine to the outer shell of, e.g., E.coli. Due to the difference in sizes between MNPs and bacteria, several MNPs bound to each bacterium, which made it possible to separate them from unreacted particles by PEG-based magnetophoretic chromatography followed by labelling with a fluorescence marker and analysis. This lead to detection limits of 100 cfu, which is close to current LoDs obtained by PCR-based DNA analysis.

Of course, selectivity of MNPs can be substantially increased: Lai et al. [9] reported a nanoparticle-based sandwich immunoassay for detecting a cytokine (TNFα) in biological samples. They report antibody-coated MNPs to capture the target analyte and incubate the solution with SERS-active gold NPs functionalized with the secondary antibody. Figure 2 clearly shows that TNFα links the two types of nanoparticles to each other, which strongly increases SERS signals. In a similar way, Ding et al. [10] combined antibody-coated MNPs with antibody-coated ZnS nanocrystals and achieved a LoD for human IgG of LoD = 0.5 fmol/L. In both cases, the role of the particles is to locally increase concentration of the target analyte on their respective surfaces to increase the respective analytical signal. This is of course of special interest for developing assay formats to detect biomarkers: Those are usually present at very low concentrations in the body. Some recent examples include pro-inflammatory cytokines [11] or a specific tumor marker [12], both of which were accessible in their physiological concentrations.
Fig. 2

Linking of MNP and SERS-active indicator nanoparticles depending on the concentration of TNFα [9]. Reprinted with permission, © Springer Nature, 2018

In a sensor setting, using MNPs makes most sense when combining them with highly sensitive detection. Aside from electrochemical techniques, fluorescence obviously plays an important role there, usually in sandwich immunoassay formats. A very recent paper on the detection of alpha-fetoprotein [13] beautifully exemplifies the benefits of the approach: Again, MNPs are coated with a capture antibody and fluorescent nanoparticles (Rhodamine 6G@SiO2) with a secondary antibody. The main advantage of this approach is to mix the MNPs with the sample followed by shaking/stirring and magnetic separation. This leads to lower detection limits and wider linear range than ELISA: The latter requires reactions on the substrate surface, rather than in the bulk volume of the sample. For the same reason, the MNP assay reduces analysis time to one-third of that required by ELISA. All these approaches pre-concentrate the target analyte by the means of MNPs. However, there are also reports for removing the matrix [14]: There, authors succeeded in detecting folic acid in food samples by removing most of the unwanted background by C6-modified MNPs and thus replacing a stationary SPME cartridge.

Overall, MNPs hence are a powerful tool to improve sample preparation and assay strategies, because they help analysts to “bring receptors to the samples” rather than the other way round. This either means that larger sample volumes can be extracted in shorter time, than through cartridges, or that sensing processes can make use of the entire sample volume rather than only the sensor surface. This also means that they are highly useful tools in overcoming a fundamental problem in sensing at low concentration: MNPs make it possible that there is realistic chance of a target analyte meeting a nanoparticle in the agitated sample within a reasonable amount of time. In that sense, ABC will continue to cover this important aspect of analysis and sample preparation.

References

  1. 1.
    Perez PA, Albero B, Tadeo JL, Sánchez-Brunete C. Determination of endocrine-disrupting compounds in water samples by magnetic nanoparticle-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:8013–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9899-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Socas-Rodríguez B, Hernández-Borges J, Herrera-Herrera AV, Rodríguez-Delgado MA. Multiresidue analysis of oestrogenic compounds in cow, goat, sheep and human milk using core-shell polydopamine coated magnetic nanoparticles as extraction sorbent in micro-dispersive solid-phase extraction followed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:2031–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0882-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Su Y, Shao CG, Huang XL, Qi JX, Ge RS, Guan HQ, et al. Extraction and detection of bisphenol A in human serum and urine by aptamer-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:1885–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0801-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li CY, Ma XG, Zhang XJ, Wang R, Chen Y, Li ZY. Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles-based solid-phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for selective determination of trace di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in water samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:7857–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9889-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urraca JL, Huertas-Pérez JF, Cazorla GA, Gracia-Mora J, García-Campaña AM, Moreno-Bondi MC. Development of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers for selective extraction: determination of citrinin in rice samples by liquid chromatography with UV diode array detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:3033–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9348-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang Y, Cao HW, Huang QW, Liu XY, Zhang HX. Isolation of transferrin by imprinted nanoparticles with magnetic deep eutectic solvents as monomer. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; in press;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1232-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kong XJ, Zheng C, Lan YH, Chi SS, Dong Q, Liu HL, et al. Synthesis of multirecognition magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer by atom transfer radical polymerization and its application in magnetic solid-phase extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:247–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0716-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Che YL, Xu Y, Wang RJ, Chen L. Rapid fluorescence detection of pathogenic bacteria using magnetic enrichment technique combined with magnetophoretic chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:4709–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0415-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai YM, Schlücker S, Wang YL. Rapid and sensitive SERS detection of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (tnf-α) in a magnetic bead pull-down assay with purified and highly Raman-active gold nanoparticle clusters. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:5993–6000.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1218-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding YD, Cong T, Chu XY, Jia Y, Hong X, Liu YC. Magnetic-bead-based sub-femtomolar immunoassay using resonant Raman scattering signals of ZnS nanoparticles. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:5013–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9601-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krause CE, Brunah AO, Bishop GW, Phadke G, Choquette L, Lalla RV, et al. Ultrasensitive microfluidic array for serum pro-inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein to assess oral mucositis risk in cancer patients. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:7239–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8873-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen YR, Wang K, Liu ZR, Sun RJ, Cui DX, He JH. Rapid detection and quantification of tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) using a superparamagnetic immunochromatographic strip. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:2319–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9328-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsai HY, Li SY, Bor Fuh C. Magnetofluorescent nanocomposites and quantum dots used for optimal application in magnetic fluorescence-linked immunoassay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:1923–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0856-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang M, Jiao Y, Cheng CS, Hua JH, Yang YL. Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots as a fluorescence probe combined with magnetic solid-phase extraction purification for analysis of folic acid in human serum. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:7063–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0665-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Vienna, Faculty for Chemistry, Department of Physical ChemistryViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations