Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 28, pp 7465–7475 | Cite as

Quantitative analysis of cefquinome considering different matrix compositions of bovine colostrum and raw milk

  • Christin Helmschrodt
  • Kathrin Schmidt
  • Sandra Bertulat
  • Laura Klein
  • Anke Finnah
  • Wolfgang Heuwieser
  • Angelika Richter
Research Paper

Abstract

A robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and comprehensively validated for the quantification of cefquinome considering the changing matrix composition from bovine colostrum to raw milk. Sample preparation consisted of addition of isotopically labeled cefquinome internal standard prior to protein precipitation of 2 g colostrum or milk followed by solid-phase extraction. A wide concentration range from 1 to 5000 ng cefquinome per gram of colostrum or milk was quantified using a 3200 QTRAP tandem mass spectrometer in positive ionization mode with electrospray ionization. Validation was performed according to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC guidelines. Matrix-comprehensive in-house validation included analytical limits CCα and CCβ, recovery, precision and calibration curves with prediction intervals, storage conditions, and evaluation of robustness based on factorial effect analysis. The detection limit was 0.2 ng cefquinome per gram of colostrum or milk. Recovery was between 98.4 and 99.4% for cefquinome concentrations from 4 to 240 ng/g. None of the investigated validation factors (matrix, storage of extracts, lot of SPE cartridges, and operators) exerted an influence higher than ± 3.2%, indicating that these factors make relatively low contributions to the respective combined measurement uncertainties. The comprehensively validated method enables routine residue control purposes and to monitor the pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in bovine colostrum and raw milk. In particular, residue depletion curves of cefquinome from high concentrations in first milking after treatment to concentrations far below the maximum residue limit can be measured.

Keywords

Cefquinome analysis Residue analysis Colostrum LC-MS/MS Dairy cattle Pharmacokinetics 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1360_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (206 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 205 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Prescott JF. Beta-lactam antibiotics: cephalosporins. In: Giguère S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD, Dowling PM, editors. Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006. p. 139–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO. WHO model list of essential medicines. In: 20; 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bachmann J, Helmschrodt C, Richter A, Heuwieser W, Bertulat S. Residue concentration of cefquinome after intramammary dry cow therapy and short dry periods. J Dairy Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samanidou VF, Karageorgou EG. An overview of the use of monoliths in sample preparation and analysis of milk. J Sep Sci. 2011;34(16–17):2013–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201100101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trufelli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, Cappiello A. An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2011;30(3):491–509.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rejczak T, Tuzimski T. QuEChERS-based extraction with dispersive solid phase extraction clean-up using PSA and ZrO2-based sorbents for determination of pesticides in bovine milk samples by HPLC-DAD. Food Chem. 2017;217:225–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.095.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stockler RM, Morin DE, Lantz RK, Hurley WL, Constable PD. Effect of milk fraction on concentrations of cephapirin and desacetylcephapirin in bovine milk after intramammary infusion of cephapirin sodium. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2009;32(4):345–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.01048.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becker M, Zittlau E, Petz M. Residue analysis of 15 penicillins and cephalosporins in bovine muscle, kidney and milk by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;520(1):19–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.04.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou XL, Wu YL, Lv Y, Xu XQ, Zhao J, Yang T. Development and validation of an ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of 10 cephalosporins and desacetylcefapirin in milk. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;931:6–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.05.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (2002). Off J Eur Commun L221:8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Junza A, Amatya R, Barron D, Barbosa J. Comparative study of the LC-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS for the multi-residue analysis of quinolones, penicillins and cephalosporins in cow milk, and validation according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879(25):2601–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.07.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jank L, Martins MT, Arsand JB, Hoff RB, Barreto F, Pizzolato TM. High-throughput method for the determination of residues of beta-lactam antibiotics in bovine milk by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2015;32(12):1992–2001.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1099745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baeza AN, Urraca JL, Chamorro R, Orellana G, Castellari M, Moreno-Bondi MC. Multiresidue analysis of cephalosporin antibiotics in bovine milk based on molecularly imprinted polymer extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1474:121–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aust V, Knappstein K, Kunz HJ, Kaspar H, Wallmann J, Kaske M. Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013;97(6):1091–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donaldson SC, Straley BA, Hegde NV, Sawant AA, DebRoy C, Jayarao BM. Molecular epidemiology of ceftiofur-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from dairy calves. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(6):3940–8.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02770-05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Julicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S. Assessment of detection methods in trace analysis by means of a statistically based in-house validation concept. Analyst. 1998;123(2):173–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/A707281C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Julicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S. A top-down in-house validation based approach for the investigation of the measurement uncertainty using fractional factorial experiments. Analyst. 1999;124(4):537–45.  https://doi.org/10.1039/A807077F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hellmann K, Radeloff I. Guidance for industry: good clinical practice. International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products (VICH). VICH, Brussels, Belgium. 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt KS, Stachel CS. In-house validation and factorial effect analysis of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of corticosteroids in bovine and porcine muscle tissue. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(19):6287–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7052-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt KS. In-house validation and factorial effect analysis of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of thyreostats in bovine blood plasma. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(3):735–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7517-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt KS, Mankertz J. In-house validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS) in bovine urine. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2018;35(7):1292–304.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1471222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bogialli S, Curini R, Di Corcia A, Lagana A, Mele M, Nazzari M. Simple confirmatory assay for analyzing residues of aminoglycoside antibiotics in bovine milk: hot water extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1067(1–2):93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bogialli S, D’Ascenzo G, Di Corcia A, Innocenti G, Lagana A, Pacchiarotta T. Monitoring quinolone antibacterial residues in bovine tissues: extraction with hot water and liquid chromatography coupled to a single- or triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(17):2833–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bohm DA, Stachel CS, Gowik P. Multi-method for the determination of antibiotics of different substance groups in milk and validation in accordance with Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216(46):8217–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruiz-Viceo JA, Rosales-Conrado N, Guillén-Casla V, Pérez-Arribas LV, León-González ME, Polo-Díez LM. Fluoroquinolone antibiotic determination in bovine milk using capillary liquid chromatography with diode array and mass spectrometry detection. J Food Compost Anal. 2012;28(2):99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Horton RA, Randall LP, Bailey-Horne V, Heinrich K, Sharman M, Brunton LA, et al. Degradation of cefquinome in spiked milk as a model for bioremediation of dairy farm waste milk containing cephalosporin residues. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(4):901–10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hermo MP, Nemutlu E, Kir S, Barron D, Barbosa J. Improved determination of quinolones in milk at their MRL levels using LC-UV, LC-FD, LC-MS and LC-MS/MS and validation in line with regulation 2002/657/EC. Anal Chim Acta. 2008;613(1):98–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.045.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tang Q, Yang T, Tan X, Luo J. Simultaneous determination of fluoroquinolone antibiotic residues in milk sample by solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(11):4535–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900513b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turnipseed SB, Andersen WC, Karbiwnyk CM, Madson MR, Miller KE. Multi-class, multi-residue liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry screening and confirmation methods for drug residues in milk. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22(10):1467–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang J, Fan X, Liu Y, Du Z, Feng Y, Jia L, et al. Extraction optimization of sixteen cephalosporins in milk by filtered solid phase extraction and ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods. 2017;9(8):1282–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY03444F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spielmeyer A, Ahlborn J, Hamscher G. Simultaneous determination of 14 sulfonamides and tetracyclines in biogas plants by liquid-liquid-extraction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(11):2513–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7649-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martins MT, Barreto F, Hoff RB, Jank L, Arsand JB, Motta TMC, et al. Multiclass and multi-residue determination of antibiotics in bovine milk by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: combining efficiency of milk control and simplicity of routine analysis. I Int Dairy J. 2016;59(Supplement C):44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.02.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dołhań A, Urbaniak B, Manuszewska M, Klause R, Tomczak S, Muszalska I, et al. Critical parameters for the stability of cefquinome sulfate in aqueous solutions and solid phase. React Kinet Mech Cat. 2017;122(2):715–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1257-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berendsen BJ, Gerritsen HW, Wegh RS, Lameris S, van Sebille R, Stolker AA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of ss-lactam antibiotics including penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems in poultry muscle using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405(24):7859–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6804-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Riediker S, Rytz A, Stadler RH. Cold-temperature stability of five beta-lactam antibiotics in bovine milk and milk extracts prepared for liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry analysis. J J Chromatogr A. 2004;1054(1–2):359–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gowik P, Polzer J, Uhlig S. Reference material in residue control: assessment of matrix effects. Accred Qual Assur. 2007;12(3):161–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0220-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christin Helmschrodt
    • 1
  • Kathrin Schmidt
    • 2
  • Sandra Bertulat
    • 3
  • Laura Klein
    • 1
  • Anke Finnah
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Heuwieser
    • 3
  • Angelika Richter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations