Advertisement

A sample-in-digital-answer-out system for rapid detection and quantitation of infectious pathogens in bodily fluids

  • Haowen Yang
  • Zhu Chen
  • Xiaobao Cao
  • Zhiyang Li
  • Stavros Stavrakis
  • Jaebum Choo
  • Andrew J. deMello
  • Philip D. Howes
  • Nongyue He
Paper in Forefront
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. ABC Highlights: authored by Rising Stars and Top Experts

Abstract

A variety of automated sample-in-answer-out systems for in vitro molecular diagnostics have been presented and even commercialized. Although efficient in operation, they are incapable of quantifying targets, since quantitation based on analog analytical methods (via standard curve analysis) is complex, expensive, and challenging. To address this issue, herein, we describe an integrated sample-in-digital-answer-out (SIDAO) diagnostic system incorporating DNA extraction and digital recombinase polymerase amplification, which enables rapid and quantitative nucleic acid analysis from bodily fluids within a disposable cartridge. Inside the cartridge, reagents are pre-stored in sterilized tubes, with an automated pipetting module allowing facile liquid transfer. For digital analysis, we fabricate a simple, single-layer polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic device and develop a novel and simple sample compartmentalization strategy. Sample solution is partitioned into an array of 40,044 fL-volume microwells by sealing the microfluidic device through the application of mechanical pressure. The entire analysis is performed in a portable, fully automated instrument. We evaluate the quantitative capabilities of the system by analyzing Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA from both spiked saliva and serum samples, and demonstrate excellent analytical accuracy and specificity. This SIDAO system provides a promising diagnostic platform for quantitative nucleic acid testing at the point-of-care.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Sample-in-answer-out Microfluidics Quantitation Digital RPA Molecular diagnostics Tuberculosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant Nos. 2008-0061891 and 2009-00426), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61527806), the Hunan Key Research Project (Grant No. 2017SK2174), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M630498). P.D.H. acknowledges support from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the Individual Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship “Ampidots” under grant agreement no. 701994.

Compliance with ethical standards

The studies described herein were approved by Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee, and have been performed in accordance with ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1335_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (357 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 356 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Fauci AS, Morens DM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):454–61.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1108296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holmes KK, Bertozzi S, Bloom BR, Jha P. Disease control priorities, third edition: volume 6. Major infectious diseases. World Bank Publications; 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hans R, Marwaha N. Nucleic acid testing-benefits and constraints. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014;8(1):2–3.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.126679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asmar S, Drancourt M. Rapid culture-based diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in developed and developing countries. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1184.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lequin RM. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Clin Chem. 2005;51(12):2415–8.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.051532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danielson PB, McKiernan HE, Legg KM. Chapter 5—Integrated polymerase chain reaction technologies (sample-to-answer technologies). In: Molecular diagnostics. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802971-8.00005-5.
  7. 7.
    Perkins MD, Kessel M. What Ebola tells us about outbreak diagnostic readiness. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):464–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vynck M, Vandesompele J, Thas O. Quality control of digital PCR assays and platforms. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(25):5919–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0538-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duewer DL, Kline MC, Romsos EL, Toman B. Evaluating droplet digital PCR for the quantification of human genomic DNA: converting copies per nanoliter to nanograms nuclear DNA per microliter. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(12):2879–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0982-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruner KM, Murray AJ, Pollack RA, Soliman MG, Laskey SB, Capoferri AA, et al. Defective proviruses rapidly accumulate during acute HIV-1 infection. Nat Med. 2016;22(9):1043–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pavsic J, Devonshire A, Blejec A, Foy CA, Van Heuverswyn F, Jones GM, et al. Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(10):2601–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zou Z, Qi P, Qing ZH, Zheng J, Yang S, Chen WJ, et al. Technologies for analysis of circulating tumour DNA: progress and promise. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;97:36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorgannezhad L, Umer M, Islam MN, Nguyen NT, Shiddiky MJA. Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies. Lab Chip. 2018;18(8):1174–96.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc00100f.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ye W, Tang XJ, Liu C, Wen CW, Li W, Lyu JX. Accurate quantitation of circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA in plasma by droplet digital PCR. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(10):2727–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0217-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kakiuchi M, Nishizawa T, Ueda H, Gotoh K, Tanaka A, Hayashi A, et al. Recurrent gain-of-function mutations of RHOA in diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):583–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whale AS, Devonshire AS, Karlin-Neumann G, Regan J, Javier L, Cowen S, et al. International interlaboratory digital PCR study demonstrating high reproducibility for the measurement of a rare sequence variant. Anal Chem. 2017;89(3):1724–33.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Z, Bai Y, Cheng Z, Liu F, Wang P, Yang D, et al. Absolute quantification of DNA methylation using microfluidic chip-based digital PCR. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;96:339–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pharo HD, Andresen K, Berg KCG, Lothe RA, Jeanmougin M, Lind GE. A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5.
  19. 19.
    Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Gale D, Forshew T, Piskorz AM, et al. Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature. 2013;497(7447):108–12.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hata AN, Niederst MJ, Archibald HL, Gomez-Caraballo M, Siddiqui FM, Mulvey HE, et al. Tumor cells can follow distinct evolutionary paths to become resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Nat Med. 2016;22(3):262–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4040.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tadmor AD, Ottesen EA, Leadbetter JR, Phillips R. Probing individual environmental bacteria for viruses by using microfluidic digital PCR. Science. 2011;333(6038):58–62.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200758.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mehle N, Dobnik D, Ravnikar M, Novak MP. Validated reverse transcription droplet digital PCR serves as a higher order method for absolute quantification of potato virus Y strains. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(16):3815–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1053-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niu CQ, Xu YC, Zhang C, Zhu PY, Huang KL, Luo YB, et al. Ultrasensitive single fluorescence-labeled probe-mediated single universal primer-multiplex-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for high-throughput genetically modified organism screening. Anal Chem. 2018;90(9):5586–93.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Demeke T, Dobnik D. Critical assessment of digital PCR for the detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(17):4039–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1010-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Piepenburg O, Williams CH, Stemple DL, Armes NA. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(7):1115–21.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stringer OW, Andrews JM, Greetham HL, Forrest MS. TwistAmp (R) Liquid: a versatile amplification method to replace PCR. Nat Methods. 2018;15(5):I–Iii.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yeh EC, Fu CC, Hu L, Thakur R, Feng J, Lee LP. Self-powered integrated microfluidic point-of-care low-cost enabling (SIMPLE) chip. Sci Adv. 2017;3(3)  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501645.
  28. 28.
    Schuler F, Schwemmer F, Trotter M, Wadle S, Zengerle R, von Stetten F, et al. Centrifugal step emulsification applied for absolute quantification of nucleic acids by digital droplet RPA. Lab Chip. 2015;15(13):2759–66.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00291e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li Z, Liu Y, Wei QQ, Liu YJ, Liu WW, Zhang XL, et al. Picoliter well array chip-based digital recombinase polymerase amplification for absolute quantification of nucleic acids. PLoS One. 2016;11(4)  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153359.
  30. 30.
    Ven KR, Vanspauwen B, Perez-Ruiz E, Leirs K, Decrop D, Gerstmans H, et al. Target confinement in small reaction volumes using microfluidic technologies: a smart approach for single-entity detection and analysis. ACS Sensors. 2018;3(2):264–84.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cao L, Cui XY, Hu J, Li ZD, Choi JR, Yang QZ, et al. Advances in digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) and its emerging biomedical applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;90:459–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang YH, Jiang HR. A review on continuous-flow microfluidic PCR in droplets: advances, challenges and future. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;914:7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu PA, Wang LQ. Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip. 2017;17(1):34–75.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc01018k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kosir AB, Divieto C, Pavsic J, Pavarelli S, Dobnik D, Dreo T, et al. Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(28):6689–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0625-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Men YF, Fu YS, Chen ZT, Sims PA, Greenleaf WJ, Huang YY. Digital polymerase chain reaction in an array of femtoliter polydimethylsiloxane microreactors. Anal Chem. 2012;84(10):4262–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300761n.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heyries KA, Tropini C, VanInsberghe M, Doolin C, Petriv OI, Singhal A, et al. Megapixel digital PCR. Nat Methods. 2011;8(8):649–U64.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Low HY, Chan SJ, Soo GH, Ling B, Tan EL. Clarity (TM) digital PCR system: a novel platform for absolute quantification of nucleic acids. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(7):1869–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0131-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shen F, Sun B, Kreutz JE, Davydova EK, Du W, Reddy PL, et al. Multiplexed quantification of nucleic acids with large dynamic range using multivolume digital RT-PCR on a rotational SlipChip tested with HIV and hepatitis C viral load. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(44):17705–12.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2060116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, Gallichotte EN, Ruf IK, Hindson BJ, et al. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods. 2013;10(10):1003–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baker M. Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods. 2012;9(6):541–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen H, Wu YQ, Chen Z, Hu ZL, Fang YL, Liao P, et al. Performance evaluation of a novel sample in-answer out (SIAO) system based on magnetic nanoparticles. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2017;13(12):1619–30.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2017.247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ali Z, Liang WB, Jin L, Tang YJ, Mou XB, Shah MAA, et al. Development of magnetic nanoparticles based nucleic acid extraction method and application in hepatitis C virus chemiluminescent detection. Sci Adv Mater. 2015;7(7):1233–40.  https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2015.1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ali ZS, Wang JH, Mou XB, Tang YJ, Li TT, Liang WB, et al. Integration of nucleic acid extraction protocol with automated extractor for multiplex viral detection. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17(2):862–70.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.12613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang JH, Ali ZS, Wang NY, Liang WB, Liu HN, Li F, et al. Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from Escherichia coli BL 21 based on silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Sci China Chem. 2015;58(11):1774–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-015-5483-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhu QY, Xu YN, Qiu L, Ma CC, Yu BW, Song Q, et al. A scalable self-priming fractal branching microchannel net chip for digital PCR. Lab Chip. 2017;17(9):1655–65.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC00267J.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 8655-2 (E), First edition. Piston-operated volumetric apparatus—part 2: piston pipettes. British Standards Institution; 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haowen Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhu Chen
    • 3
    • 4
  • Xiaobao Cao
    • 1
  • Zhiyang Li
    • 5
  • Stavros Stavrakis
    • 1
  • Jaebum Choo
    • 6
  • Andrew J. deMello
    • 1
  • Philip D. Howes
    • 1
  • Nongyue He
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied BiosciencesETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Biosystems Science and EngineeringETH ZürichBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Economical Forest Cultivation and Utilization of 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center in Hunan Province, Hunan Key Laboratory of Biomedical Nanomaterials and DevicesHunan University of TechnologyZhuzhouChina
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  5. 5.Department of Clinical LaboratoryThe Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
  6. 6.Department of Bionano TechnologyHanyang UniversityAnsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations