Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 26, pp 6713–6717 | Cite as

Fluorescent “keep-on” type pharmacophore obtained from dynamic combinatorial library of Schiff bases

  • Yudai Tabuchi
  • Masumi Taki
Communication
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

We established a novel principle for fluorescence detection of a target protein. A low-molecular-weight fluorescent pharmacophore, as a targeted probe, was selected from a dynamic combinatorial library of Schiff bases. The pharmacophore retains its fluorescence when bound to the hydrophobic site of the target, whereas it loses it because of hydrolysis when unbound.

Graphical abstract

We describe a novel concept for detection of a target protein (i.e., HSA) by using a keep-on-type fluorescent pharmacophore which is discovered from a dynamic combinatorial library of Schiff bases. When the target is absent, the keep-on-pharmacophore is degraded by hydrolysis, with the result that we can see no fluorescence.

Keywords

Fluorescent HSA binder Dynamic combinatorial library Schiff base Size-exclusion chromatography Hydrolysis Protein-ligand docking simulation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by a JSPS KAKENHI grant (#17K05925) to M.T. We are grateful to Prof. Dr. K. Ikebukuro and Dr. J. Lee (TUAT) for use of the ITC instrument installed by the grant from the Low-Carbon Research Network Japan (LCnet). We appreciate Dr. L. Nelson (MD Anderson), Prof. T. Yamashita (Keio Univ.), and Prof. M. Tanaka (UEC) for critical reading of this manuscript. We also thank to Dr. H. Nakamura (Biomodeling Research Inc.) for fruitful discussions about molecular modeling.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1303_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (989 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 989 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ueno T, Nagano T. Fluorescent probes for sensing and imaging. Nat Methods. 2011;8(8):642–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taki M, Inoue H, Mochizuki K, Yang J, Ito Y. Selection of color-changing and intensity-increasing fluorogenic probe as protein-specific indicator obtained via the 10BASE(d)-T. Anal Chem. 2016;88(2):1096–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee MH, Kim JS, Sessler JL. Small molecule-based ratiometric fluorescence probes for cations, anions, and biomolecules. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(13):4185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fujita H, Kataoka Y, Tobita S, Kuwahara M, Sugimoto N. Novel one-tube-one-step real-time methodology for rapid transcriptomic biomarker detection: signal amplification by ternary initiation complexes. Anal Chem. 2016;88(14):7137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan J, Dodani SC, Chang CJ. Reaction-based small-molecule fluorescent probes for chemoselective bioimaging. Nat Chem. 2012;4(12):973–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawaguchi M, Okabe T, Okudaira S, Hanaoka K, Fujikawa Y, Terai T, et al. Fluorescence probe for lysophospholipase C/NPP6 activity and a potent NPP6 inhibitor. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(31):12021–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urano Y, Sakabe M, Kosaka N, Ogawa M, Mitsunaga M, Asanuma D, et al. Rapid cancer detection by topically spraying a gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-activated fluorescent probe. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(110):110ra9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vendrell M, Zhai D, Er JC, Chang YT. Combinatorial strategies in fluorescent probe development. Chem Rev. 2012;112(8):4391–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ljosa V, Carpenter AE. High-throughput screens for fluorescent dye discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26(10):527–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poronik YM, Bernas T, Wrzosek A, Banasiewicz M, Szewczyk A, Gryko DT. One-photon and two-photon mitochondrial fluorescent probes based on a Rhodol chromophore. Asian J Org Chem. 2018;7(2):411–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu TT, Gao YQ, Zhang XM, Wan YC, Du LP, Fang H, et al. Discovery of a turn-on fluorescent probe for myeloid cell leukemia-1 protein. Anal Chem. 2017;89(21):11173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang YJ, Yan J, Yao TP. Discovery of a fluorescent probe with HDAC6 selective inhibition. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;141:596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly PM, Keely NO, Bright SA, Yassin B, Ana G, Fayne D, et al. Novel selective estrogen receptor ligand conjugates incorporating endoxifen-combretastatin and cyclofenil-combretastatin hybrid scaffolds: synthesis and biochemical evaluation. Molecules. 2017;22(9):1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang XY, Aulabaugh A. Application of fluorescence polarization in HTS assays. High throughput screening: methods and protocols, 3rd Edition. 2016;1439:115–30.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall MD, Yasgar A, Peryea T, Braisted JC, Jadhav A, Simeonov A, et al. Fluorescence polarization assays in high-throughput screening and drug discovery: a review. Methods Appl Fluoresc. 2016;4(2):022001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levitt JA, Matthews DR, Ameer-Beg SM, Suhling K. Fluorescence lifetime and polarization-resolved imaging in cell biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(1):28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lea WA, Simeonov A. Fluorescence polarization assays in small molecule screening. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2011;6(1):17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burchak ON, Mugherli L, Ostuni M, Lacapere JJ, Balakirev MY. Combinatorial discovery of fluorescent pharmacophores by multicomponent reactions in droplet arrays. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(26):10058–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yun SW, Kang NY, Park SJ, Ha HH, Kim YK, Lee JS, et al. Diversity oriented fluorescence library approach (DOFLA) for live cell imaging probe development. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47(4):1277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramstrom O, Lehn JM. Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(1):26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mondal M, Hirsch AK. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry: a tool to facilitate the identification of inhibitors for protein targets. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(8):2455–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J, Nowak P, Otto S. Dynamic combinatorial libraries: from exploring molecular recognition to systems chemistry. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(25):9222–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herrmann A. Dynamic combinatorial/covalent chemistry: a tool to read, generate and modulate the bioactivity of compounds and compound mixtures. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(6):1899–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang R, Leung IK. Protein-directed dynamic combinatorial chemistry: a guide to protein ligand and inhibitor discovery. Molecules. 2016;21(7):910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huc I, Lehn JM. Virtual combinatorial libraries: dynamic generation of molecular and supramolecular diversity by self-assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(6):2106–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang X, Yin J, Yoon J. Recent advances in development of chiral fluorescent and colorimetric sensors. Chem Rev. 2014;114(9):4918–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang Z, He W, Li X, Li Z, Chen B, Ouyang P, et al. A novel protocol to accelerate dynamic combinatorial chemistry via isolation of ligand-target adducts from dynamic combinatorial libraries: a case study identifying competitive inhibitors of lysozyme. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23(18):5174–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang Z, Fang Z, He W, Wang Z, Gan H, Tian Q, et al. Identification of inhibitors for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor by using dynamic combinatorial chemistry. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26(7):1671–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Er JC, Vendrell M, Tang MK, Zhai D, Chang YT. Fluorescent dye cocktail for multiplex drug-site mapping on human serum albumin. ACS Comb Sci. 2013;15(9):452–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shen P, Hua JY, Jin HD, Du JY, Liu CL, Yang W, et al. Recognition and quantification of HSA: a fluorescence probe across alpha-helices of site I and site II. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017;247:587–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oettl K, Stauber RE. Physiological and pathological changes in the redox state of human serum albumin critically influence its binding properties. Brit J Pharmacol. 2007;151(5):580–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fukunishi Y, Mikami Y, Nakamura H. Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. J Mol Graph Model. 2005;24(1):34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fukunishi Y, Mikami Y, Nakamura H. The filling potential method: a method for estimating the free energy surface for protein-ligand docking. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107(47):13201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sasaki S, Drummen GPC, Konishi G. Recent advances in twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) fluorescence and related phenomena in materials chemistry. J Mater Chem C. 2016;4(14):2731–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Janzen WP. Screening technologies for small molecule discovery: the state of the art. Chem Biol. 2014;21(9):1162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Science, Bioscience and Technology Program, The Graduate School of Informatics and EngineeringThe University of Electro-Communications (UEC)ChofuJapan

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options