Comparison of μ-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and py-GCMS as identification tools for microplastic particles and fibers isolated from river sediments
- 905 Downloads
In recent years, many studies on the analysis of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples have been published. These studies are hardly comparable due to different sampling, sample preparation, as well as identification and quantification techniques. Here, MP identification is one of the crucial pitfalls. Visual identification approaches using morphological criteria alone often lead to significant errors, being especially true for MP fibers. Reliable, chemical structure-based identification methods are indispensable. In this context, the frequently used vibrational spectroscopic techniques but also thermoanalytical methods are established. However, no critical comparison of these fundamentally different approaches has ever been carried out with regard to analyzing MP in environmental samples. In this blind study, we investigated 27 single MP particles and fibers of unknown material isolated from river sediments. Successively micro-attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (μ-ATR-FTIR) and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (py-GCMS) in combination with thermochemolysis were applied. Both methods differentiated between plastic vs. non-plastic in the same way in 26 cases, with 19 particles and fibers (22 after re-evaluation) identified as the same polymer type. To illustrate the different approaches and emphasize the complementarity of their information content, we exemplarily provide a detailed comparison of four particles and three fibers and a critical discussion of advantages and disadvantages of both methods.
KeywordsMicroplastics py-GCMS ATR FTIR Environmental samples Comparison Validation
This work was part of the Leibniz Competition project “Microplastics as vector for microbial populations in the ecosystem of the Baltic Sea (MikrOMIK),” funded by the German Leibniz Association (grant number SAW-2014-IOW-2). Parts of this study were funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 03F0734D) in the joint research project BASEMAN (JPI-Oceans microplastics projects). Furthermore, Andrea Käppler is thankful for financial support by the BONUS MICROPOLL project funded jointly by the EU and BMBF (03F0775A).
The authors want to thank Rica Wegner, Nicole Stollberg, and Oliver Biniasch (all formerly IOW) for the extraction and isolation of the particles and fibers. The technical assistance of Oliver Voigt (IPF) during ATR-FTIR measurements is also acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 13.Imhof HK, Sigl R, Brauer E, Feyl S, Giesemann P, Klink S, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of macro-, meso- and microplastic abundance on a remote coral island of the Maldives, Indian Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;116:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Vianello A, Boldrin A, Guerriero P, Moschino V, Rella R, Sturaro A, et al. Microplastic particles in sediments of Lagoon of Venice, Italy: first observations on occurrence, spatial patterns and identification. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2013;130:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Harrison JP, Ojeda JJ, Romero-González ME. The applicability of reflectance micro-Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy for the detection of synthetic microplastics in marine sediments. Sci Total Environ. 2012;416:455–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mintenig SM, Int-Veen I, Löder MGJ, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging. Water Res. 2017;108:365–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Fries E, Dekiff JH, Willmeyer J, Nuelle M-T, Ebert M, Remy D. Identification of polymer types and additives in marine microplastic particles using pyrolysis-GC/MS and scanning electron microscopy. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15:1949–56. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00214d.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Falkenhagen J, Sturm H, et al. Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters? Environ Pollut. 2017;231:1256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Tsuge S, Ohtani H, Watanabe C. Pyrolysis—GC/MS data book of synthetic polymers. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier B.V.; 2011.Google Scholar
- 43.Mandelkern L, Alamo RG. Polyethylene, linear high-density. In: Mark JE, editor. Polymer data handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 493–507.Google Scholar
- 44.Beyler CL, Hirschler MM. Thermal decomposition of polymers. In: Beyler CL, Custer RLP, Walton WD, John MJW, Drysdale D, John RJH, et al., editors. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd ed. National Fire Protection Association; 2005. p. 110–31.Google Scholar
- 48.González N, Fernández-Berridi MJ. Application of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in the study of interactions between PVC and plasticizers: PVC/plasticizer compatibility versus chemical structure of plasticizer. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;101:1731–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Ziêba-Palus J, Milczarek JM, Koscielniak P. Application of infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis-gas chromatography – mass spectrometry to the analysis of automobile paint samples. Chem Anal. 2008;53:109–21.Google Scholar
- 53.Hummel DO, Scholl F. Atlas der Polymer- und Kunststoffanalyse, Band 2 Kunststoff, Fasern, Kautschuk, Harze, Ausgangs- und Hilfsstoffe, Abbauprodukte - Teil b/I. 2. VCH, Weinheim; 1988.Google Scholar
- 54.Hummel DO, Scholl F. Atlas of polymer and plastics analysis, volume 2 plastics, fibres, rubbers, resins; starting and auxiliary materials, degradation products, part a/I. 2. VCH, Weinheim; 1984.Google Scholar
- 55.Huang CK, Kerr PF. Infrared study of the carbonate minerals. Am Mineral. 1960;45:311–24.Google Scholar
- 56.Mitić Ž, Stolić A, Stojanović S, Najman S, Ignjatović N, Nikolić G, et al. Instrumental methods and techniques for structural and physicochemical characterization of biomaterials and bone tissue: a review. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;79:930–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Learner T. The analysis of synthetic paints by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (PyGCMS). Stud Conserv. 2001;46:225–41.Google Scholar
- 61.Rimez B, Rahier H, Van Assche G, Artoos T, Biesemans M, Van Mele B. The thermal degradation of poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), part I: experimental study of the degradation mechanism. Polym Degrad Stab. 2008;93:800–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Comnea-Stancu IR, Wieland K, Ramer G, Schwaighofer A, Lendl B. On the identification of rayon/viscose as a major fraction of microplastics in the marine environment: discrimination between natural and manmade cellulosic fibers using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2017;71:939–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702816660725.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar