Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 20, pp 5009–5018 | Cite as

Development of a method for the simultaneous determination of multi-class pesticides in earthworms by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem electrospray mass spectrometry

  • Gaëlle Daniele
  • Florent Lafay
  • Céline Pelosi
  • Clémentine Fritsch
  • Emmanuelle Vulliet
Research Paper

Abstract

Agricultural intensification, and in particular the use of pesticides, leads over the years to a loss of biodiversity and a decline of ecosystem services in cultivated zones and agricultural landscapes. Among the animal communities involved in the functioning of agro-ecosystems, earthworms are ubiquitous and recognized as indicators of land uses and cultural practices. However, little data is available on the levels of pesticides in such organisms in natura, which would allow estimating their actual exposure and the potentially resulting impacts. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop a sensitive analytical methodology to detect and quantify 27 currently used pesticides in earthworms (Allolobophora chlorotica). A modified QuEChERS extraction was implemented on individual earthworms. This step was followed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The whole analytical method was validated on spiked earthworm blank samples, with regard to linearity (from 1 to 100 method limit of quantification, r2 > 0.95), intra-day precision (relative standard deviation (RSD) < 15%), inter-day precision (RSD < 20%), recoveries (mainly in the range 70–110%), and limits of detection and of quantification (inferior to 5 ng/g for most of the pesticides). The developed method was successfully applied to determine the concentrations of pesticides in nine individuals collected in natura. Up to five of the selected pesticides have been detected in one individual.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Pesticide residues Earthworm LC-MS/MS Ecotoxicology Trace analysis Bioaccumulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the “Zone Atelier Plaine et Val de Sèvre” and especially Vincent Bretagnolle for the study site access and provision of site infrastructures. They thank J. Mathieu (University Pierre and Marie Curie, IEES, Paris) for the earthworm supply from its laboratory culture. They also thank all the people who took part in the earthworm sampling in Chizé. ZA PVS is a long-term research platform of the network Recotox (https://www.recotox.eu/). The authors are grateful to Recotox for supporting the study

Funding information

This work has been financially supported by the French ONEMA within the national call “Pesticides” (APR ECOPHYTO 2014).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1151_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (294 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 293 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto J-C, García-Río L. The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric Ecosys Environ. 2008;123(4):247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Druart C, Millet M, Scheifler R, Delhomme O, Raeppel C, de Vaufleury A. Snails as indicators of pesticide drift, deposit, transfer and effects in the vineyard. Sci Tot Environ. 2011;409(20):4280–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen PK, Olesen MH. Spray mass balance in pesticide application: a review. Crop Protec. 2014;61:23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, Baker G, Brussaard L, Butt KR, et al. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Sci. 2013;64:161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelosi C, Toutous L, Chiron F, Dubs F, Hedde M, Muratet A, et al. Reduction of pesticide use can increase earthworm populations in wheat crops in a European temperate region. Agric Ecosys Environ. 2013;181(1):223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katagi T, Ose K. Toxicity, bioaccumulation and metabolism of pesticides in the earthworm. J Pestic Sci. 2015;40(3):69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh S, Singh J, Vig AP. Earthworm as ecological engineers to change the physico-chemical properties of soil: soil vs vermicast. Ecolog Engin. 2016;90:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hickman ZA, Reid BJ. Earthworm assisted bioremediation of organic contaminants. Environ Intern. 2008;34(7):1072–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    King RA, Vaughan IP, Bell JR, Bohan DA, Symondson WOC. Prey choice by carabid beetles feeding on an earthworm community analysed using species- and lineage-specific PCR primers. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:1721–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellis SR, Hodson ME, Wege P. The soil-dwelling earthworm Allolobophora chlorotica modifies its burrowing behaviour in response to carbendazim applications. Ecotox Environ Saf. 2010;73(6):1424–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasmin S, D’Sousa D. Effects of pesticides on the growth and reproduction of earthworm: a review. Applied and Environ Soil Sci 2010; pages 9 doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/678360.
  12. 12.
    Pisa LW, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Downs CA, Goulson D, et al. Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2015;22(1):68–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Wu S, Chen L, Wu C, Yu R, Wang Q, et al. Toxicity assessment of 45 pesticides to the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Chemosphere. 2012;88(4):484–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Datta S, Singh J, Singh S, Singh J. Earthworms, pesticides and sustainable agriculture: a review. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2016;23:8227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diao J, Xu P, Liu D, Lu Y, Zhou Z. Enantiomer-specific toxicity and bioaccumulation of alpha-cypermethrin to earthworm Eisenia fetida. J Hazard Mat. 2011;192(3):1072–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang H, Chen J, Guo B-Y, Li J. Enantioseletive bioaccumulation and metabolization of diniconazole in earthworms (Eiseniafetida) in an artificial soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;99:98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cao J, Li P, Li QX, Zheng P, Diao X. Bioaccumulation and elimination of the herbicide clomazone in the earthworms Eisenia fetida. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;95:606–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang J, Wang Y, Wang H, Li J, Xu P. Bioaccumulation and enantioselectivity of type I and type II pyrethroid pesticides in earthworm. Chemosphere. 2016;144:1351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bergé A, Vulliet E. Development of a method for the analysis of hormones and pharmaceuticals in earthworms by quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) extraction followed by liquid-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:7995–8008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daniele G, Giroud B, Jabot C, Vulliet E. Exposure assessment of honeybees through study of hive matrices: analysis of selected pesticide residues in honeybees, beebread and beeswax from French beehives by LC-MS/MS. Environ Sci Poll Res 2017;1–9. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9227-7.
  21. 21.
    Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ. Fast and easy multi-residue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int. 2003;86:412–31.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daniele G, Fieu M, Joachim S, James-Casas A, Andres S, Baudoin P, et al. Development of a multi-residue analysis of diclofenac and some transformation products in bivalves using QuEChERS extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Application to samples from mesocosm studies. Talanta. 2016;155:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sordet M, Berlioz-Barbier A, Buleté A, Garric J, Vulliet E. Quantification of emerging micropollutants in an amphipod crustacean by nanoliquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry using multiple reaction monitoring cubed mode. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1456:217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaëlle Daniele
    • 1
  • Florent Lafay
    • 1
  • Céline Pelosi
    • 2
  • Clémentine Fritsch
    • 3
  • Emmanuelle Vulliet
    • 1
  1. 1.Univ Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Ens de Lyon, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280VilleurbanneFrance
  2. 2.INRA, UMR1402 ECOSYS, Pôle Ecotoxicologie Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Ecotoxicologie des AgroécosystèmesVersailles CedexFrance
  3. 3.UMR 6249 Chrono-Environnement – CNRS / Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Usc INRABesancon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations