Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 1, pp 57–69 | Cite as

Fast automated online xylanase activity assay using HPAEC-PAD

  • Christin Cürten
  • Nico Anders
  • Niels Juchem
  • Nina Ihling
  • Kristina Volkenborn
  • Andreas Knapp
  • Karl-Erich Jaeger
  • Jochen Büchs
  • Antje C. Spiess
Paper in Forefront

Abstract

In contrast to biochemical reactions, which are often carried out under automatic control and maintained overnight, the automation of chemical analysis is usually neglected. Samples are either analyzed in a rudimentary fashion using in situ techniques, or aliquots are withdrawn and stored to facilitate more precise offline measurements, which can result in sampling and storage errors. Therefore, in this study, we implemented automated reaction control, sampling, and analysis. As an example, the activities of xylanases on xylotetraose and soluble xylan were examined using high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The reaction was performed in HPLC vials inside a temperature-controlled Dionex™ AS-AP autosampler. It was started automatically when the autosampler pipetted substrate and enzyme solution into the reaction vial. Afterwards, samples from the reaction vial were injected repeatedly for 60 min onto a CarboPac™ PA100 column for analysis. Due to the rapidity of the reaction, the analytical method and the gradient elution of 200 mM sodium hydroxide solution and 100 mM sodium hydroxide with 500 mM sodium acetate were adapted to allow for an overall separation time of 13 min and a detection limit of 0.35–1.83 mg/L (depending on the xylooligomer). This analytical method was applied to measure the soluble short-chain products (xylose, xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and longer xylooligomers) that arise during enzymatic hydrolysis. Based on that, the activities of three endoxylanases (EX) were determined as 294 U/mg for EX from Aspergillus niger, 1.69 U/mg for EX from Bacillus stearothermophilus, and 0.36 U/mg for EX from Bacillus subtilis.

Graphical abstract

Xylanase activity assay automation

Keywords

Automatic activity assay Xylanase HPAEC-PAD Enzyme 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was performed as part of the Cluster of Excellence “Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass,” which is funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments to promote science and research at German universities. The scientific activities of the Bioeconomy Science Center were financially supported by the Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Research within the framework of the NRW Strategieprojekt BioSC (no. 313/323-400-002 13). Specials thanks go to Priya Philip of the Institute for Biochemical Engineering of RWTH Aachen University for supplying the RAMOS fed-batch technique.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2017_712_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (383 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 382 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D. Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin. 2012;6(4):465–82.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viell J, Inouye H, Szekely NK, Frielinghaus H, Marks C, Wang Y, et al. Multi-scale processes of beech wood disintegration and pretreatment with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate/water mixtures. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0422-9.
  3. 3.
    Yang B, Dai Z, Ding SY, Wyman CE. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels. 2011;2:421–49.  https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.11.116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW. The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(4):1083–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diogo JA, Hoffmam ZB, Zanphorlin LM, Cota J, Machado CB, Wolf LD, et al. Development of a chimeric hemicellulase to enhance the xylose production and thermotolerance. Enzym Microb Technol. 2015;69:31–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.11.006.
  6. 6.
    Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry. Units of enzyme activity. Eur J Biochem. 1979;97:319–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13116.x.
  7. 7.
    Lever M. Colorimetric and fluorometric carbohydrate determination with p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide. Biochem Med. 1973;7:274–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2944(73)90083-5.
  8. 8.
    Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    König J, Grasser R, Pikor H, Vogel K. Determination of xylanase, beta-glucanase, and cellulase activity. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2002;374(1):80–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-002-1379-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Decker SR, Adney WS, Jennings E, Vinzant TB, Himmel ME. Automated filter paper assay for determination of cellulase activity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003;105-108:689–703.  https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey MJ, Biely P, Poutanen K. Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol. 1992;23(3):257–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(92)90074-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anders N, Schelden M, Simon R, Spiess AC. Automated chromatographic laccase-mediator system activity assay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;409(20):4801–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0423-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dionex Corporation. Product manual for Dionex CarboPacTM MA1, PA1, PA10 and PA100 columns 031824–08. http://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/4375-Man-031824-08-CarboPac-Combined-May10.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2017.
  14. 14.
    He XS, Shyu YT, Nathoo S, Wong SL, Doi RH. Construction and use of a Bacillus subtilis mutant deficient in multiple protease genes for the expression of eukaryotic genes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;27(646):69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb18565.x.
  15. 15.
    Bähr C, Leuchtle B, Lehmann C, Becker J, Jeude M, Peinemann F, et al. Dialysis shake flask for effective screening in fed-batch mode. Biochem Eng J. 2012;69:182–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2012.08.012.
  16. 16.
    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Chem. 1985;150:76–85.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghose TK, Bisaria VS. Measurement of hemicellulase activities—part 1: xylanases. Pure Appl Chem. 1987;59(12):1739–52.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198759020257.
  19. 19.
    Anders N, Humann H, Langhans B, Spiess AC. Simultaneous determination of acid-soluble biomass-derived compounds using high performance anion exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed amperometric detection. Anal Methods. 2015;7:7866–73.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ay01371b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Épshtein N. Structure of chemical compounds, methods of analysis and process control: validation of HPLC techniques. Pharm Chem J. 2004;38:212–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Courtin CM, Swennen K, Verjans P, Delcour JA. Heat and pH stability of prebiotic arabinoxylooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharides and fructooligosaccharides. Food Chem. 2009;112(4):831–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oefner PJ, Lanziner AH, Bonn G, Bobleter O. Quantitative studies on furfural and organic-acid formation during hydrothermal, acidic and alkaline-degradation of deuterium-xylose. Monatsh Chem. 1992;123(6–7):547–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00816848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baumann MJ, Murphy L, Lei N, Krogh KBRM, Borch K, Westh P. Advantages of isothermal titration calorimetry for xylanase kinetics in comparison to chemical-reducing-end assays. Anal Biochem. 2011;410(1):19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem. 2009;48(8):3713–29.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801542g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Subramaniyan S, Prema P. Biotechnology of microbial xylanases: enzymology, molecular biology, and application. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2002;22(1):33–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550290789450.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christin Cürten
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nico Anders
    • 1
    • 2
  • Niels Juchem
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nina Ihling
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kristina Volkenborn
    • 2
    • 4
  • Andreas Knapp
    • 2
    • 4
  • Karl-Erich Jaeger
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jochen Büchs
    • 2
    • 3
  • Antje C. Spiess
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Aachener Verfahrenstechnik—Enzyme Process TechnologyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC)JülichGermany
  3. 3.Aachener Verfahrenstechnik—Biochemical EngineeringRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Molecular Enzyme TechnologyHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  5. 5.Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-1: BiotechnologyJülichGermany
  6. 6.Institute of Biochemical EngineeringTU BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations