Rapid preconcentration of viable bacteria using magnetic ionic liquids for PCR amplification and culture-based diagnostics
- 389 Downloads
In this study, a series of magnetic ionic liquids (MILs) were investigated for the extraction and preconcentration of bacteria from aqueous samples. By dispersing small volumes (e.g., 15 μL) of MIL within an aqueous cell suspension, bacteria were rapidly extracted and isolated using a magnetic field. Of the seven hydrophobic MILs examined, the trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium Ni(II) hexafluoroacetylacetonate ([P66614 +][Ni(hfacac)3 −]) MIL exhibited the greatest enrichment of viable Escherichia coli K12 when coupled with microbiological culture as the detection method. The MIL-based strategy was applied for the preconcentration of E. coli from aqueous samples to obtain enrichment factors (E F) as high as 44.6 in less than 10 min. The MIL extraction approach was also interfaced with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification where the positive detection of E. coli was achieved with the [P66614 +][Co(hfacac)3 −], [P66614 +][Ni(hfacac)3 −], [P66614 +][Dy(hfacac)4 −], and [P66614 +][Nd(hfacac)4 −] MILs. While direct sampling of an aqueous cell suspension at a concentration of 1.68 × 104 colony-forming units (CFUs) mL−1 yielded no amplicon when subjected to PCR, extraction of the sample with the [P66614 +][Ni(hfacac)3 −] MIL under optimized conditions provided sufficient enrichment of E. coli for amplicon detection. Importantly, the enrichment of bacteria using the Ni(II)-, Co(II)-, and Dy(III)-based MILs was compatible with real-time quantitative PCR amplification to dramatically improve sample throughput and lower detection limits to 1.0 × 102 CFUs mL−1. The MIL-based method is much faster than existing enrichment approaches that typically require 24-h cultivation times prior to detection and could potentially be applied for the preconcentration of a variety of Gram-negative bacteria from aqueous samples.
KeywordsPreconcentration Culture diagnostics Ionic liquids Sample preparation
J.L.A. acknowledges funding from the Chemical Measurement and Imaging Program at the National Science Foundation (CHE-1413199).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 12.Gu H, Xu K, Xu C, Xu B. Biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles for protein separation and pathogen detection. Chem Commun. 2006;9:941–9.Google Scholar
- 13.Zhu P, Shelton DR, Li S, Adams DL, Karns JS, Amstutz P, Tang CM. Detection of E. coli O157:H7 by immunomagnetic separation coupled with fluorescence immunoassay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;30:337–41.Google Scholar
- 14.Schwab KJ, De Leon R, Sobsey MD. Immunoaffinity concentration and purification of waterborne enteric viruses for detection by reverse transcriptase PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2086–94.Google Scholar
- 16.Del Sesto RE, McCleskey TM, Burrell AK, Baker GA, Thompson JD, Scott BL, Wilkes JS, Williams P. Structure and magnetic behavior of transition metal based ionic liquids. Chem Commun. 2008;4:447–9.Google Scholar
- 28.Pierson SA, Nacham O, Clark KD, Nan H, Mudruk Y, Anderson JL. Synthesis and characterization of low viscosity hexafluoroacetylacetonate-based hydrophobic magnetic ionic liquids. New J Chem. 2017. doi: 10.1039/C7NJ00206H.
- 31.Heininger A, Binder M, Schmidt S, Unertl K, Botzenhart K, Döring G. PCR and blood culture for detection of Escherichia coli bacteremia in rats. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2479–82.Google Scholar