Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 408, Issue 27, pp 7745–7751 | Cite as

Study of the degradation of a multidrug transporter using a non-radioactive pulse chase method

  • Qian Chai
  • Stacy R. Webb
  • Zhaoshuai Wang
  • Rebecca E. Dutch
  • Yinan WeiEmail author
Research Paper


Proteins are constantly synthesized and degraded in living cells during their growth and division, often in response to metabolic and environmental conditions. The synthesis and breakdown of proteins under different conditions reveal information about their mechanism of function. The metabolic incorporation of non-natural amino acid azidohomoalanine (AHA) and subsequent labeling via click chemistry emerged as a non-radioactive strategy useful in the determination of protein kinetics and turnover. We used the method to monitor the degradation of two proteins involved in the multidrug efflux in Escherichia coli, the inner membrane transporter AcrB and its functional partner membrane fusion protein AcrA. Together they form a functional complex with an outer membrane channel TolC to actively transport various small molecule compounds out of E. coli cells. We found that both AcrA and AcrB lasted for approximately 6 days in live E. coli cells, and the stability of AcrB depended on the presence of AcrA but not on active efflux. These results lead to new insight into the multidrug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria conferred by efflux.


Pulse chase Protein lifetime Integral membrane protein Azidohomoalanine Click chemistry Multidrug efflux pump 



This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (MCB 1158036, YW) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R21AI103717, YW; R01 AI051517, RED; and F31 fellowship AI120653-01, SRW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2016_9871_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (197 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 197 kb)


  1. 1.
    Goldberg A, ST. John A. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:747–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer R, Doherty F. FEBS Lett. 1986;198:181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dice JF. FASEB J. 1987;1:349–57.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simon E, Kornitzer D. Methods Enzymol. 2014;536:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martell J, Weerapana E. Molecules. 2014;19:1378–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avti PK, Maysinger D, Kakkar A. Molecules. 2013;18:9531–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hatzenpichler R, Scheller S, Tavormina PL, Babin BM, Tirrell DA, Orphan VJ. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:2568–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dieck ST, Kochen L, Hanus C, Heumüller M, Bartnik I, Nassim-Assir B, et al. Nat Methods. 2015;12:411–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Link AJ, Tirrell DA. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:11164–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simon M, Stefan N, Borsig L, Pluckthun A, Zangemeister-Wittke U. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McClatchy DB, Ma YH, Liu C, Stein BD, Martinez-Bartolome S, Vasquez D, et al. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:4815–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dieterich DC, Hodas JJL, Gouzer G, Shadrin IY, Ngo JT, Triller A, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:897–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deal RB, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Science. 2010;328:1161–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiroshi N, Yumiko R. Biochim Biophys Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2009;1794:769–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koronakis V, Eswaran J, Hughes C. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:467–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li XZ, Poole K, Nikaido H. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu W, Zhong M, Wei Y. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:863–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu W, Chai Q, Zhong M, Yu L, Fang J, Wang T, et al. J Mol Biol. 2012;423:123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Link AJ, Vink MK, Tirrell DA. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:10598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chai Q, Wang Z, Webb S, Dutch RE, Wei Y. Biochemistry. 2016;5:2301–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hinz FI, Dieterich DC, Tirrell DA, Schuman EM. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012;3:40–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2002;41:2596–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenberg EY, Bertenthal D, Nilles ML, Bertrand KP, Nikaido H. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1609–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su CC, Li M, Gu R, Takatsuka Y, McDermott G, Nikaido H, et al. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:7290–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Belle A, Tanay A, Bitincka L, Shamir R, O’Shea EK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13004–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cambridge SB, Gnad F, Nguyen C, Bermejo JL, Krüger M, Mann M. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:5275–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yen HC, Xu Q, Chou DM, Zhao Z, Elledge SJ. Science. 2008;322:918–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Willetts NS. Biochem J. 1967;103:453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koch AL, Levy HR. J Biol Chem. 1955;217:947–57.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luscombe M, Phelps CF. Biochem J. 1967;102:110–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borek E, Ponticorvo L, Rittenberg D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958;44:369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Larrabee KL, Phillips JO, Williams GJ, Larrabee AR. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:4125–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qian Chai
    • 1
  • Stacy R. Webb
    • 2
  • Zhaoshuai Wang
    • 1
  • Rebecca E. Dutch
    • 2
  • Yinan Wei
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular & Cellular BiochemistryUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations