Hybridoma as a specific, sensitive, and ready to use sensing element: a rapid fluorescence assay for detection of Vibrio cholerae O1
- 249 Downloads
Over the last decade, isolation and purification of monoclonal antibodies, for diagnostic analysis, have been carried out using the hybridoma expression system. The present study describes a novel example of a detection system using hybridoma cells containing antibody against O1 antigen directly for V. cholerae diagnosis, which is a major health problem in many parts of the world, especially in developing countries. This method has advantages such as simplicity, ease of process, and it does not require manipulation of hybridoma cell. For this approach, an efficient amount of fluorescence calcium indicator, fura 2-AM, was utilized, which emitted light when the intracellular calcium concentration increased as result of antigen binding to specific antibody. More reliable results are obtained via this method and it is considerably faster than other methods, which has the response time of less than 45 s for detection of V. Cholerae O1. Also, the limit of detection was computed to be 50 CFU/mL (<13 CFU per assay). In addition, no significant responses were observed in the presence of other bacteria with specific hybridoma or other cell lines exposed to V. cholerae O1. Furthermore, this method was successfully applied to V. cholerae O1 detection in spiked environmental samples, including water and stool samples without any pretreatment. All results reveal that hybridoma cells can provide a valuable, simple, and ready to use tool for rapid detection of other pathogenic bacteria, toxins, and analytes.
KeywordsVibrio cholerae O1 Hybridoma Fura 2-AM Calcium increasing Fluorescence emission Monoclonal antibody
This work was supported by the research council of Tarbiat Modares University and Ministry of Sciences, Researches, and Technology, Iran.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Pandey S. Hybridoma technology for production of monoclonal antibodies. Hybridoma. 2010;1(2):017.Google Scholar
- 6.Petrovick MS, Harper JD, Nargi FE, Schwoebel ED, Hennessy MC, Rider TH, Hollis MA. Rapid sensors for biological-agent identification. Lincoln Lab J. 2007;17(1):63–84.Google Scholar
- 11.Wang L, Wang R, Kong B-W, Jin S, Ye K, Fang W, Li Y. B cells using calcium signaling for specific and rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Scientific reports. 5;2015:10598.Google Scholar
- 12.Robb M, Nichols JC, Whoriskey SK, Murphy JR. Isolation of hybridoma cell lines and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against cholera enterotoxin and its subunits. Infect Immun. 1982;38(1):267–72.Google Scholar
- 14.Islam MS, Drasar BS, Sack RB. The aquatic flora and fauna as reservoirs of Vibrio cholerae: a review. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1994;87–96.Google Scholar
- 16.Kay BA, Bopp CA, Wells JG. Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae O1 from fecal specimens. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. Washington: ASM Press; 1994. p. 3–25.Google Scholar
- 20.Adams LB, Henk MC, Siebeling RJ. Detection of Vibrio cholerae with monoclonal antibodies specific for serovar O1 lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(9):1801–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Schauer S, Sommer R, Farnleitner AH, Kirschner AK. Rapid and sensitive quantification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus cells in water samples by use of catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with solid-phase cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(20):7369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Chakraborty S, Alam M, Scobie HM, Sack DA. Adaptation of a simple dipstick test for detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in environmental water. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:320.Google Scholar
- 27.George CM, Rashid M-U, Sack DA, Bradley Sack R, Saif-Ur-Rahman KM, Azman AS, Monira S, Bhuyian SI, Zillur Rahman KM, Toslim Mahmud M. Evaluation of enrichment method for the detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 using a rapid dipstick test in Bangladesh. Tropical Med Int Health. 2014;19(3):301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Nato F, Boutonnier A, Rajerison M, Grosjean P, Dartevelle S, Guenole A, Bhuiyan NA, Sack DA, Nair GB, Fournier JM. One-step immunochromatographic dipstick tests for rapid detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in stool samples. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10(3):476–8.Google Scholar
- 33.Alam M, Sultana M, Nair GB, Siddique A, Hasan NA, Sack RB, Sack DA, Ahmed KU, Sadique A, Watanabe H, Grim CJ, Huq A, Colwell RR. Viable but nonculturable Vibrio cholerae O1 in biofilms in the aquatic environment and their role in cholera transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(45):17801–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Di Pinto A, Ciccarese G, Tantillo G, Catalano D, Forte VT. A collagenase-targeted multiplex PCR assay for identification of Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio cholerae, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Food Prot. 2005;68(1):150–3.Google Scholar
- 41.Senachai P, Chomvarin C, Namwat W, Wongboot W, Wongwajana S, Tangkanakul W. Application of tetraplex PCR for detection of Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. mimicus in cockle. SE Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44:249–58.Google Scholar
- 42.Zeinoddini M, Saeedinia AR, Sadeghi V. Rapid detection of Vibrio cholerae using hexaplex PCR assay. J Police Med. 2014;3(2):78–84.Google Scholar
- 46.Mukherjee P, Ghosh S, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya MK, Nandy RK, Takeda Y, Nair GB, Mukhopadhyay AK. Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic dipstick kit for diagnosis of cholera emphasizes its outbreak utility. Jap J Infect Dis. 2010;63(4):234–8.Google Scholar