Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 407, Issue 16, pp 4629–4638 | Cite as

Structural characterization of multiple pyoverdines secreted by two Pseudomonas strains using liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry with varying dissociation energies

Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

High-affinity iron (Fe)-scavenging molecules, or siderophores, are secreted by microorganisms to acquire and compete for Fe. Pyoverdine (PVD), the primary siderophore produced by Pseudomonas, consists of a dihydroxyquinoline-type chromophore, a peptide chain of variable length and conformation, and a side chain composed of a dicarboxylic acid or its monoamide derivative. Elucidation of the PVD structures secreted by different Pseudomonas strains is an important step toward understanding their Fe-transport strategies. In this study, we characterized multiple PVDs secreted by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Pseudomonas fluorescens RA12 using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution quadrupole-orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry. To avoid purification steps prior to characterizing the bacterial supernatants, PVD candidates were identified by extracting fragments of the dihydroxyquinoline component from the chromatographic peaks. Varying collisional dissociation energies were subsequently applied to achieve, with high mass accuracy, a broad coverage of fragments of the entire PVD. Our approach allowed us to discriminate between three different PVD structures in the secretion of each strain. The three PVDs of P. putida possess the same peptide chain of seven amino acids, Asp-Orn-OHAsp-Dab-Gly-Ser-cOHOrn, with a cyclicized portion present in two of the PVDs. For P. fluorescens, two of the PVDs had the same peptide chain of 13 amino acids, Ala-Lys-Gly-Gly-Ala-OHAsp-Gly-Ser-Ala-Ala-Ala-Ala-cOHOrn, whereas a third PVD had a Ser substituting for the first Ala. The side chain of the PVDs was either succinic acid or succinamide. The present approach can be employed for simultaneous structural characterization of several peptidic siderophores and related molecules in bacterial secretions.

Graphical abstract

Characterizing mutiple pyoverdine (PVD) structures in bacterial secretions without prepurification step

Keywords

Siderophore Peptide UHPLC HR/AM 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Rania Abou-Kandil for providing the P. fluorescens strain. We thank David F. Flannelly and Matthew A. Kukurugya for commenting on earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by a Research Starter grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation (SSB 1337292) from the Division of Systems and Synthetic Biology.

Supplementary material

216_2015_8659_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (76 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 75 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Poblete-Castro I, Becker J, Dohnt K, dos Santos V, Wittmann C (2012) Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida and related species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93(6):2279–2290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spiers AJ, Buckling A, Rainey PB (2000) The causes of Pseudomonas diversity. Microbiology 146(10):2345–2350Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silby MW, Winstanley C, Godfrey SAC, Levy SB, Jackson RW (2011) Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35(4):652–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cezard C, Farvacques N, Sonnet P (2015) Chemistry and biology of Pyoverdines, pseudomonas primary siderophores. Curr Med Chem 22(2):165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cornelis P, Matthijs S (2007) Pseudomonas siderophores and their biological significance. In: Varma A, Chincholkar S (eds) Microbial siderophores, vol 12. Soil biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meyer J-M (2000) Pyoverdines: pigments, siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent Pseudomonas species. Arch Microbiol 174(3):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Visca P, Imperi F, Lamont IL (2007) Pyoverdine siderophores: from biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends Microbiol 15(1):22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornelis P (2010) Iron uptake and metabolism in pseudomonads. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(6):1637–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthijs S, Laus G, Meyer J-M, Abbaspour-Tehrani K, Schäfer M, Budzikiewicz H, Cornelis P (2009) Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition in the entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila L48 and its close relative Pseudomonas putida KT2440. BioMetals 22(6):951–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer J-M, Gruffaz C, Raharinosy V, Bezverbnaya I, Schäfer M, Budzikiewicz H (2008) Siderotyping of fluorescent Pseudomonas: molecular mass determination by mass spectrometry as a powerful pyoverdine siderotyping method. BioMetals 21(3):259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer J-M, Geoffroy VA, Baida N, Gardan L, Izard D, Lemanceau P, Achouak W, Palleroni NJ (2002) Siderophore typing, a powerful tool for the identification of fluorescent and nonfluorescent pseudomonads. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(6):2745–2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer J-M (2010) Pyoverdine siderophores as taxonomic and phylogenic markers. In: Ramos JL, Filloux A (eds) Pseudomonas. Springer, Netherlands, pp 201–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyer J-M, Stintzi A, Coulanges V, Shivaji S, Voss JA, Taraz K, Budzikiewic H (1998) Siderotyping of fluorescent pseudomonads:characterization of pyoverdines of Pseudornonas fluorescens and Pseudornonas putida strains from Antarctica. Microbiology 144(11):3119–3126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bultreys A, Gheysen I, Wathelet B, Maraite H, de Hoffmann E (2003) High-performance liquid chromatography analyses of pyoverdin siderophores differentiate among phytopathogenic fluorescent Pseudomonas species. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(2):1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schäfer M, Fuchs R, Budzikiewicz H, Springer A, Meyer J-M, Linscheid M (2006) Structure elucidation of cyclic pyoverdins and examination of rearrangement reactions in MS/MS experiments by determination of exact product ion masses. J Mass Spectrom 41(9):1162–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuchs R, Budzikiewicz H (2001) Rearrangement reactions in the electrospray ionization mass spectra of pyoverdins. Int J Mass Spectrom 210–211:603–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fuchs R, Budzikiewicz H (2001) Structural studies of pyoverdins by mass spectrometry. Curr Org Chem 5(3):265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budzikiewicz H, Schafer M, Fernandez DU, Meyer J (2006) Structure proposal for a new pyoverdin from Pseudomonas sp. PS 6.10. Z Naturforsch C 61(11/12):815Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Domon B, Aebersold R (2006) Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312(5771):212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aebersold R, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422(6928):198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aebersold R, Goodlett DR (2001) Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem Rev 101(2):269–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eng J, McCormack A, Yates J (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5(11):976–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perkins DN, Pappin DJC, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20(18):3551–3567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steen H, Mann M (2004) The abc’s (and xyz’s) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(9):699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roepstorff P, Fohlman J (1984) Proposal for a nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrosc 11:601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dongré AR, Jones JL, Somogyi Á, Wysocki VH (1996) Influence of peptide composition, gas-phase basicity, and chemical modification on fragmentation efficiency: evidence for the mobile proton model. J Am Chem Soc 118(35):8365–8374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang XJ, Thibault P, Boyd RK (1993) Fragmentation reactions of multiply-protonated peptides and implications for sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry with low-energy collision-induced dissociation. Anal Chem 65(20):2824–2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nilsson CL (2011) Advances in quantitative phosphoproteomics. Anal Chem 84(2):735–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jedrychowski MP, Huttlin EL, Haas W, Sowa ME, Rad R, Gygi SP (2011) Evaluation of HCD- and CID-type fragmentation within their respective detection platforms for murine phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(12):M111.009910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Frese CK, Altelaar AFM, Hennrich ML, Nolting D, Zeller M, Griep-Raming J, Heck AJR, Mohammed S (2011) Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos. J Proteome Res 10(5):2377–2388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shen Y, Tolić N, Xie F, Zhao R, Purvine SO, Schepmoes AA, Moore RJ, Anderson GA, Smith RD (2011) Effectiveness of CID, HCD, and ETD with FT MS/MS for degradomic-peptidomic analysis: comparison of peptide identification methods. J Proteome Res 10(9):3929–3943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Diedrich J, Pinto AM, Yates J III (2013) Energy dependence of HCD on peptide fragmentation: stepped collisional energy finds the sweet spot. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 24(11):1690–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Neta P, Simon-Manso Y, Yang X, Stein SE (2009) Collisional energy dependence of peptide ion fragmentation. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 20(3):469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bushee JL, Argikar UA (2011) An experimental approach to enhance precursor ion fragmentation for metabolite identification studies: application of dual collision cells in an orbital trap. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25(10):1356–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scigelova M, Makarov A (2006) Orbitrap mass analyzer—overview and applications in proteomics. Proteomics 6(S2):16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Denisov E, Damoc E, Lange O, Makarov A (2012) Orbitrap mass spectrometry with resolving powers above 1,000,000. Int J Mass Spectrom 325–327:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang Y, Hao Z, Kellmann M, Huhmer A (2012) HR/AM targeted peptide quantitation on a Q Exactive MS: a unique combination of high selectivity, sensitivity and throughput. SRM 6:7Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lu W, Clasquin MF, Melamud E, Amador-Noguez D, Caudy AA, Rabinowitz JD (2010) Metabolomic analysis via reversed-phase ion-pairing liquid chromatography coupled to a stand alone Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. Anal Chem 82(8):3212–3221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Budzikiewicz H, Schäfer M, Fernández D, Matthijs S, Cornelis P (2007) Characterization of the chromophores of pyoverdins and related siderophores by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. BioMetals 20(2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hider RC, Kong X (2010) Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat Prod Rep 27(5):637–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ravel J, Cornelis P (2003) Genomics of pyoverdine-mediated iron uptake in pseudomonads. Trends Microbiol 11(5):195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salah El Din ALM, Kyslík P, Stephan D, Abdallah MA (1997) Bacterial iron transport: structure elucidation by FAB-MS and by 2D NMR (1H, 13C, 15N) of pyoverdin G4R, a peptidic siderophore produced by a nitrogen-fixing strain of Pseudomonas putida. Tetrahedron 53(37):12539–12552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mohn G, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H, Naturforsch Z (1990) New pyoverdin-type siderophores from Pseudomonas fluorescens. Z Naturforsc B J Chem Sci 45(10):1437–1450Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations