Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 407, Issue 8, pp 2117–2125 | Cite as

An enhanced droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling system coupled with HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for spatially resolved analysis

  • Vilmos KerteszEmail author
  • Taylor M. Weiskittel
  • Gary J. Van Berkel
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Mass Spectrometry Imaging

Abstract

Droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-electrospray ionization (ESI)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for spatially resolved analysis provides the possibility of effective analysis of complex matrix samples and can provide a greater degree of chemical information from a single spot sample than is typically possible with a direct analysis of an extract. Described here is the setup and enhanced capabilities of a discrete droplet liquid microjunction surface sampling system employing a commercially available CTC PAL autosampler. The system enhancements include incorporation of a laser distance sensor enabling unattended analysis of samples and sample locations of dramatically disparate height as well as reliably dispensing just 0.5 μL of extraction solvent to make the liquid junction to the surface, wherein the extraction spot size was confined to an area about 0.7 mm in diameter; software modifications improving the spatial resolution of sampling spot selection from 1.0 to 0.1 mm; use of an open bed tray system to accommodate samples as large as whole-body rat thin tissue sections; and custom sample/solvent holders that shorten sampling time to approximately 1 min per sample. The merit of these new features was demonstrated by spatially resolved sampling, HPLC separation, and mass spectral detection of pharmaceuticals and metabolites from whole-body rat thin tissue sections and razor blade (“crude”) cut mouse tissue.

Graphical abstract

Workflow of the droplet based liquid microjunction surface sampling process

Keywords

Liquid microjunction Droplet-based liquid extraction Autosampler Spatial distribution Laser distance sensor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The API 4000 instrument used in this work was provided on loan, and advancement of this surface sampling technology was supported by funding provided through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA NFE-10-02966) with AB Sciex. Drs. Jimmy Flarakos, Paul Moench, Adam Bentley, and Alexandre Catoire (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) are thanked for providing the whole-body rat thin tissue sections through a Work for Others (WFO) agreement with Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Waltham, MA, USA) is thanked for providing the AZ-3-dosed mouse tissues through a WFO agreement. T.M.W. acknowledges an ORNL appointment through the ORISE HERE program that was supported through the WFO agreement with Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research. The authors would like to thank Lonnie J. Love from the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for his valuable help in 3D printing of the custom trays.

Supplementary material

216_2014_8287_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (175 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 174 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Van Berkel GJ, Sanchez AD, Quirke JME (2002) Anal Chem 74:6216–6223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asano KG, Ford MJ, Tomkins BA, Van Berkel GJ (2005) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:2305–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Berkel GJ, Kertesz V, King RC (2009) Anal Chem 81:7096–7101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ElNaggar MS, Barbier C, Van Berkel GJ (2011) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 22:1157–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Berkel GJ, Kertesz V (2013) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 27:1329–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roach PJ, Laskin L, Laskin A (2010) Analyst 135:2233–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Momotenko D, Qiao L, Cortés-Salazar F, Lesch A, Wittstock G, Girault HH (2012) Anal Chem 84:6630–6637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ (2010) J Mass Spectrom 45:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ (2010) Anal Chem 82:5917–5921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao W, Celiz AD, Scurr DJ, Alexander MR, Barrett DA (2013) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 24:1927–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montowska M, Rao W, Alexander MR, Tucker GA, Barrett DA (2014) Anal Chem 86:4479–4487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ (2013) Bioanal 5:819–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kertesz V, Paranthaman N, Moench P, Catoire A, Flarakos J, Van Berkel GJ (2014) Bioanal (In press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ (2014) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 28:1553–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ, Vavrek M, Koeplinger KA, Schneider BB, Covey TR (2008) Anal Chem 80:5168–5177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Berkel GJ, Kertesz V (2009) Anal Chem 81:9146–9152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blatherwick EQ, Van Berkel GJ, Pickup K, Johansson MK, Beaudoin M-E, Cole RO, Day JM, Iverson S, Wilson ID, Scrivens JH, Weston DJ (2011) Xenobiotica 41:720–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vilmos Kertesz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Taylor M. Weiskittel
    • 2
  • Gary J. Van Berkel
    • 1
  1. 1.Organic and Biological Mass Spectrometry Group, Chemical Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.ORISE HERE InternUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations