Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 406, Issue 29, pp 7601–7609 | Cite as

Fluorescence imaging of macromolecule transport in high molecular weight cut-off microdialysis

  • Jiangtao Chu
  • Vitali Koudriavtsev
  • Klas Hjort
  • Andreas P. Dahlin
Research Paper

Abstract

When microdialysis (MD) membrane exceeds molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 100 kDa, the fluid mechanics are in the ultrafiltration regime. Consequently, fluidic mass transport of macromolecules in the perfusate over the membrane may reduce the biological relevance of the sampling and cause an inflammatory response in the test subject. Therefore, a method to investigate the molecular transport of high MWCO MD is presented. An in vitro test chamber was fabricated to facilitate the fluorescent imaging of the MD sampling process, using fluoresceinylisothiocyanate (FITC) dextran and fluorescence microscopy. Qualitative studies on dextran behavior inside and outside the membrane were performed. Semiquantitative results showed clear dextran leakage from both 40 and 250 kDa dextran when 100 kDa MWCO membranes were used. Dextran 40 kDa leaked out with an order of magnitude higher concentration and the leakage pattern resembled more of a convective flow pattern compared with dextran 250 kDa, where the leakage pattern was more diffusion based. No leakage was observed when dextran 500 kDa was used as a colloid osmotic agent. The results in this study suggest that fluorescence imaging could be used as a method for qualitative and semiquantitative molecular transport and fluid dynamics studies of MD membranes and other hollow fiber catheter membranes.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Microdialysis High molecular weight cut-off Membrane Fluorescence Imaging FITC Dextran 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was in part supported by the Uppsala Berzelii Technology Centre for Neurodiagnostics, funded by the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems and the Swedish Research Council Grant number P29797-1. The authors acknowledge mDialysis and Pharmacosomos AS for sharing their knowledge and for material support and Visualize your Science for graphical assistance.

Supplementary material

216_2014_8192_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (669 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 668 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chaurasia CS (1999) In vivo microdialysis sampling: theory and applications. Biomed Chromatogr 13:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plock N, Kloft C (2005) Microdialysis—theoretical background and recent implementation in applied life-sciences. Eur J Pharm Sci 25:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ungerstedt U (1991) Microdialysis—principles and applications for studies in animals and man. J Intern Med 230:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ao XP, Stenken JA (2006) Microdialysis sampling of cytokines. Methods 38:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clough GF (2005) Microdialysis of large molecules. AAPS J 7:E686–E692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosdahl H, Hamrin K, Ungerstedt U, Henriksson J (2000) A microdialysis method for the in situ investigation of the action of large peptide molecules in human skeletal muscle: detection of local metabolic effects of insulin. Int J Biol Macromol 28:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schutte RJ, Oshodi SA, Reichert WM (2004) In vitro characterization of microdialysis sampling of macromolecules. Anal Chem 76:6058–6063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pettersson A, Amirkhani A, Arvidsson B, Markides K, Bergquist J (2004) A feasibility study of solid supported enhanced microdialysis. Anal Chem 76:1678–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clough GF, Jackson CF, Lee JJP, Jamal SC, Church MK (2007) What can microdialysis tell us about the temporal and spatial generation of cytokines in allergen-induced responses in human skin in vivo? J Invest Dermatol 127:2799–2806Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahlin AP, Wetterhall M, Caldwell KD, Larsson A, Bergquist J, Hillered L, Hjort K (2010) Methodological aspects on microdialysis protein sampling and quantification in biological fluids: an in vitro study on human ventricular CSF. Anal Chem 82:4376–4385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kjellstrom S, Appels N, Ohlrogge M, Laurell T, Marko-Varga G (1999) Microdialysis—a membrane based sampling technique for quantitative determination of proteins. Chromatographia 50:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu JT, Hjort K, Larsson A, Dahlin AP (2014) Impact of static pressure on transmembrane fluid exchange in high molecular weight cut off microdialysis. Biomed Microdevices 16:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bungay PM, Wang TL, Yang H, Elmquist WF (2010) Utilizing transmembrane convection to enhance solute sampling and delivery by microdialysis. J Membr Sci 348:131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dahlin AP, Hjort K, Hillered L, Sjodin MOD, Bergquist J, Wetterhall M (2012) Multiplexed quantification of proteins adsorbed to surface-modified and non-modified microdialysis membranes. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:2057–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trickler WJ, Miller DW (2003) Use of osmotic agents in microdialysis studies to improve the recovery of macromolecules. J Pharm Sci 92:1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim KJ, Fane AG, Ben Aim R, Liu MG, Jonsson G, Tessaro IC, Broek AP, Bargeman D (1994) A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization. J Membr Sci 81:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keeler GD, Durdik JM, Stenken JA (2013) Comparison of microdialysis sampling perfusion fluid components on the foreign body reaction in rat subcutaneous tissue. Eur J Pharm Sci, in press. [Epub ahead of print; PMID: 24239995]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lichtman JW, Conchello JA (2005) Fluorescent Microscopy. Nat Methods 2:910–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu XC, Xu L, Wu TB, Xu AQ, Zhao MP, Liu SR (2014) Continuous monitoring of bisulfide variation in microdialysis effluents by on-line droplet-based microfluidic fluorescent sensor. Biosens Bioelectron 55:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang X, Stenken JA (2006) Microdialysis sampling membrane performance during in vitro macromolecule collection. Anal Chem 78:6026–6034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bungay PM, Morrison PM, Dedrick RL (1990) Steady-state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. Life Sci 46:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dahlin AP, Wetterhall M, Liljegren G, Bergström SK, Andrén P, Nyholm L, Markides KE, Bergquist J (2005) Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry from a polymer modified poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip with an integrated graphite electrospray tip. Analyst 130:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loan CE, Aberle T, Burchard W (2000) Structure Properties of Dextran. Macromol 33:5730–5739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li Z, Hughes D, Urban JPG, Cui Z (2008) Effect of pumping methods on transmembrane pressure, fluid balance and relative recovery in microdialysis. J Membr Sci 310:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maurer MH, Berger C, Wolf M, Fütterer CD, Feldmann RE Jr, Schwab S, Kuschinsky W (2003) The proteome of human brain microdialysate. Proteome Sci 1:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pharmacosmos GPC standards (2014) Pharmacosmos. Available at: http://www.dextran.net. Accessed 28 Mar 2014. (Online document)
  27. 27.
    Pharmacosmos A/S batch release certificate, Dextran 60 EP, Batch no: 40013 (2006) Pharmacosmos. Available at: http://www.dextran.net. Accessed 6 Jan 2006. (Online document)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiangtao Chu
    • 1
  • Vitali Koudriavtsev
    • 1
  • Klas Hjort
    • 1
  • Andreas P. Dahlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations