A biocatalytic cascade with several output signals—towards biosensors with different levels of confidence
Abstract
The biocatalytic cascade based on enzyme-catalyzed reactions activated by several biomolecular input signals and producing output signal after each reaction step was developed as an example of a logically reversible information processing system. The model system was designed to mimic the operation of concatenated AND logic gates with optically readable output signals generated at each step of the logic operation. Implications include concurrent bioanalyses and data interpretation for medical diagnostics.
A biocatalytic cascade with several inputs–outputs was designed for bioanalytical applications providing responses with increasing levels of confidence
Keywords
Bioanalytical methods Bioassays Enzymes Optical sensors Biocomputing Logic gatesNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NSF award #CBET-1066397 (Clarkson University) and by Grant No. EB014586 (Univ. of CT) from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), NIH.
Supplementary material
References
- 1.Katz E (ed) (2012) Biomolecular computing—from logic systems to smart sensors and actuators. Willey, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- 2.Katz E, Privman V (2010) Chem Soc Rev 39:1835–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Katz E (ed) (2012) Molecular and supramolecular information processing—from molecular switches to unconventional computing. Willey, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- 4.De Silva AP, Uchiyama S, Vance TP, Wannalerse B (2007) Coord Chem Rev 251:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Calude CS, Costa JF, Dershowitz N, Freire E, Rozenberg G (eds) (2009) Unconventional computation. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5715. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 6.Unger R, Moult J (2006) Proteins 63:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ezziane Z (2006) Nanotechnology 17:R27–R39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Stojanovic MN, Mitchell TE, Stefanovic D (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:3555–3561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Li Z, Rosenbaum MA, Venkataraman A, Tam TK, Katz E, Angenent LT (2011) Chem Commun 47:3060–3062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Benenson Y (2009) Mol BioSyst 5:675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Adar R, Benenson Y, Linshiz G, Rosner A, Tishby N, Shapiro E (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:9960–9965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Katz E, Wang J, Privman M, Halámek J (2012) Anal Chem 84:5463–5469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kahan M, Gil B, Adar R, Shapiro E (2008) Physica D 237:1165–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Halámková L, Halámek J, Bocharova V, Wolf S, Mulier KE, Beilman G, Wang J, Katz E (2012) Analyst 137:1768–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Garipelly R, Kiran PM, Kumar AS (2013) Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3:417–423Google Scholar
- 16.Orbach R, Remacle F, Levine RD, Willner I (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:21228–21233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Klein JP, Leete TH, Rubin H (1999) Biosystems 52:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Remon P, Ferreira R, Montenegro J-M, Suau R, Perez-Inestrosa E, Pischel U (2009) ChemPhysChem 10:2004–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sigma Chemical Company (1991) Bioluminescent determination of ATP with luciferase-luciferin. Technical bulletin no. BL-100. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Sigma/Bulletin/fle1000bul.pdf
- 20.Meisenheimer PL, O’Brien MA, Cali JJ (2008) Promega Notes 100:22–26Google Scholar
- 21.Pütter J, Becker R (1983) In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol III, 3rd edn. Chemie, Deerfield Beach, pp 286–293Google Scholar
