Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 406, Issue 12, pp 2747–2756 | Cite as

Quinolines in clothing textiles—a source of human exposure and wastewater pollution?

  • Giovanna Luongo
  • Gunnar Thorsén
  • Conny Östman
Paper in Forefront

Abstract

A production process in which the use of various types of chemicals seems to be ubiquitous makes the textile industry a growing problem regarding both public health as well as the environment. Among several substances used at each stage, the present study focuses on the quinolines, a class of compounds involved in the manufacture of dyes, some of which are skin irritants and/or classified as probable human carcinogens. A method was developed for the determination of quinoline derivatives in textile materials comprising ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, solid phase extraction cleanup, and final analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Quinoline and ten quinoline derivatives were determined in 31 textile samples. The clothing samples, diverse in color, material, brand, country of manufacture, and price, and intended for a broad market, were purchased from different shops in Stockholm, Sweden. Quinoline, a possible human carcinogen, was found to be the most abundant compound present in almost all of the samples investigated, reaching a level of 1.9 mg in a single garment, and it was found that quinoline and its derivatives were mainly correlated to polyester material. This study points out the importance of screening textiles with nontarget analysis to investigate the presence of chemicals in an unbiased manner. Focus should be primarily on clothing worn close to the body.

Keywords

Quinoline Clothing Textiles Garment Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Meng Hu is acknowledged for the initial work on the present study.

References

  1. 1.
    Fransson K, Molander S (2012) Handling chemical risk information in international textile supply chains. J Environ Plan Manag 56(3):345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sartorelli P et al (1998) Prediction of percutaneous absorption from physicochemical data: a model based on data of in vitro experiments. Ann Occup Hyg 42(4):267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos JD, Meinardi MMHM (2000) The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 9(3):165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karlberg A-T et al (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis––formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 21(1):53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kezic S, Nielsen JB (2009) Absorption of chemicals through compromised skin. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(6):677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blum A et al (1978) Children absorb tris-BP flame retardant from sleepwear: urine contains the mutagenic metabolite, 2,3-dibromopropanol. Science 201(4360):1020–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hatch KL, Maibach HI (1995) Textile dye dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 32(4):631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hatch KL (1984) Chemicals and textiles: part II: dermatological problems related to finishes. Text Res J 54(11):721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lensen G et al (2007) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis and conjunctivitis after occupational exposure to chlorothalonil in textiles. Contact Dermatitis 57(3):181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cioni F et al (1999) Development of a solid phase microextraction method for detection of the use of banned azo dyes in coloured textiles and leather. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 13(18):1833–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lv G et al (2009) Determination of perfluorinated compounds in packaging materials and textiles using pressurized liquid extraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Sci 25(3):425–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu F et al (2009) Application of solid-phase microextraction for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides in textiles by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 650(2):202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Zeng Z, Liu M (2011) Analysis of naphthalene residues in textile samples by GC-FID using sol-gel-derived SPME fiber. J Chromatogr Sci 49(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu X et al (2014) Concentrations and trends of perfluorinated chemicals in potential indoor sources from 2007 through 2011 in the US. Chemosphere 98:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horstmann M, McLachlan MS (1995) Results of an initial survey of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and dibenzofurans (PCDF) in textiles. Chemosphere 31(2):2579–2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klasmeier J, McLachlan MS (1998) PCDD/Fs in textiles—part 1: a screening method for detection of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and octachlorodibenzofuran. Chemosphere 36(7):1627–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klasmeier J, Mühlebach A, McLachlan MS (1999) PCDD/Fs in textiles—part II: transfer from clothing to human skin. Chemosphere 38(1):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loos R et al (2007) LC–MS–MS analysis and occurrence of octyl- and nonylphenol, their ethoxylates and their carboxylates in Belgian and Italian textile industry, waste water treatment plant effluents and surface waters. Chemosphere 66(4):690–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wakeham SG (1979) Azaarenes in recent lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 13(9):1118–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stedman RL (1968) Chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Chem Rev 68(2):153–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen T, Clausen P, Jensen FP (1986) Determination of basic azaarenes and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in airborne particulate matter by gas chromatography. Anal Chim Acta 187:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Drushel HV, Sommers AL (1966) Isolation and identification of nitrogen compounds in petroleum. Anal Chem 38(1):19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mukherjee S, Pal M (2013) Quinolines: a new hope against inflammation. Drug Discov Today 18(7–8):389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vezmar M, Georges E (2000) Reversal of MRP-mediated doxorubicin resistance with quinoline-based drugs. Biochem Pharmacol 59(10):1245–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foley M, Tilley L (1998) Quinoline antimalarials: mechanisms of action and resistance and prospects for new agents. Pharmacol Ther 79(1):55–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guy HG (1943) Agricultural uses of coal and its products. Ind Eng Chem 35(2):139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P-l L et al (2012) Studies on quinoline type dyes and their characterisation studies on acrylic fabric. Color Technol 128(3):192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y-l Y et al (2006) Treatment of wastewater from dye manufacturing industry by coagulation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 7(2):340–344Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oliveira DP et al (2007) Chemical characterization of a dye processing plant effluent—identification of the mutagenic components. Mutat Res 626(1–2):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    La Voie EJ et al (1988) Carcinogenicity of quinoline, 4- and 8-methylquinoline and benzoquinolines in newborn mice and rats. Food Chem Toxicol 26(7):625–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hirao K et al (1976) Carcinogenic activity of quinoline on rat liver. Cancer Res 36:329–335Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    LaVoie EJ et al (1984) Tumor-initiating activity of quinoline and methylated quinolines on the skin of SENCAR mice. Cancer Lett 22(3):269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nagao M et al (1977) Mutagenicities of quinoline and its derivatives. Mutat Res 42:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eisentraeger A et al (2008) Heterocyclic compounds: toxic effects using algae, daphnids, and the Salmonella/microsome test taking methodical quantitative aspects into account. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(7):1590–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Birkholz DA et al (1990) Aquatic toxicology of alkyl-quinolines. Water Res 24(1):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    US Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Quinoline (CASRN 91-22-5). http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/1004.htm
  37. 37.
    Ryberg K et al (2006) Contact allergy to textile dyes in southern Sweden. Contact Dermatitis 54(6):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swedish Chemicals Agency (2013) Hazardous chemicals in textiles - report of a government assignment, Report 3/13. Swedish Chemicals Agency, Stockholm, p 114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanna Luongo
    • 1
  • Gunnar Thorsén
    • 1
  • Conny Östman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Arrhenius LaboratoryStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations