Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 405, Issue 20, pp 6599–6603 | Cite as

Capillary liquid chromatographic fingerprint used for discrimination of Zingiber montanum from related species

  • Mohamad Rafi
  • Lee Wah Lim
  • Toyohide Takeuchi
  • Latifah Kosim Darusman
Note

Abstract

Fingerprint analysis using capillary liquid chromatography (CLC) has been developed for discrimination of Zingiber montanum (ZM) from related species, for example Z. americans (ZA) and Z. zerumbet (ZZ). By comparing the fingerprint chromatograms of ZM, ZA, and ZZ we could identify ZM samples and discriminate them from ZA and ZZ by using their marker peaks. We also combined CLC fingerprint with multivariate analysis, including principal-component analysis (PCA) and canonical variate analysis (CVA); all three species were discriminated successfully. This result indicates that CLC fingerprint analysis in combination with PCA and CVA can be used for discrimination of ZM samples from samples of related species.

Keywords

Zingiber montanum Zingiber americans Zingiber zerumbet Capillary liquid chromatography Fingerprint analysis Multivariate analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Bua-in S, Paisooksantivatana Y (2009) Kasetsart J Nat Sci 43:467–475Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Amin M, Sultana GNN, Hossain CF (2012) J Ethnopharmacol 141:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Habsah M, Amran M, Mackeen MM, Lajis NH, Kikuzaki H, Nakatani N, Rahman AA, Ghafar Ali AM (2000) J Ethnopharmacol 72:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozaki Y, Kawahara N, Harada M (1991) Chem Pharm Bull 39:2353–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alaerts G, Dejaegher B, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Vander Heyden Y (2010) Comb Chem High Throughput Screening 13:900–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao YY, Zhang Y, Lin RC, Sun WJ (2009) Fitoterapia 80:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng XM, Zhao T, Yang T, Wang CH, Bligh SWH, Wang ZT (2010) Phytochem Anal 21:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun J, Chen P (2011) Anal Bioanal Chem 399:1877–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martins LRR, Pereira-Filho ER, Cass QB (2011) Anal Bioanal Chem 400:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang J, Li XR, Han J (2012) J Chin Med Res Dev 1:47–53Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takeuchi T (2005) Chromatography 26:7–10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rafi M, Lim LW, Takeuchi T, Darusman LK (2013) Talanta 103:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ni Y, Song R, Kokot S (2012) Anal Methods 4:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu XJ, Hu J, Li ZY, Qin XM, Zhang LZ, Guo XQ (2011) Arch Pharm Res 34:961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu X, Jiang J, Liang Y, Yi L, Cheng J (2010) Anal Methods 2:2002–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lavine BK, Rayens WS (2009) In: Brown SD, Tauler R, Walczak B (eds) Comprehensive Chemometrics: Chemical and Biochemical Data Analysis Volume 3. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canals T, Riba JR, Cantero R, Cansino J, Domingo D, Iturriaga H (2008) Talanta 77:751–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brereton RG (2003) Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamad Rafi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lee Wah Lim
    • 1
  • Toyohide Takeuchi
    • 1
  • Latifah Kosim Darusman
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of EngineeringGifu UniversityGifuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesBogor Agricultural UniversityBogorIndonesia
  3. 3.Biopharmaca Research Center-Research and Community Empowerment InstituteBogor Agricultural UniversityBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations