Quantification of 31 illicit and medicinal drugs and metabolites in whole blood by fully automated solid-phase extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
- 885 Downloads
An efficient method for analyzing illegal and medicinal drugs in whole blood using fully automated sample preparation and short ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) run time is presented. A selection of 31 drugs, including amphetamines, cocaine, opioids, and benzodiazepines, was used. In order to increase the efficiency of routine analysis, a robotic system based on automated liquid handling and capable of handling all unit operation for sample preparation was built on a Freedom Evo 200 platform with several add-ons from Tecan and third-party vendors. Solid-phase extraction was performed using Strata X-C plates. Extraction time for 96 samples was less than 3 h. Chromatography was performed using an ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA). Analytes were separated on a 100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm Acquity UPLC CSH C18 column using a 6.5 min 0.1 % ammonia (25 %) in water/0.1 % ammonia (25 %) in methanol gradient and quantified by MS/MS (Waters Quattro Premier XE) in multiple-reaction monitoring mode. Full validation, including linearity, precision and trueness, matrix effect, ion suppression/enhancement of co-eluting analytes, recovery, and specificity, was performed. The method was employed successfully in the laboratory and used for routine analysis of forensic material. In combination with tetrahydrocannabinol analysis, the method covered 96 % of cases involving driving under the influence of drugs. The manual labor involved in preparing blood samples, solvents, etc., was reduced to a half an hour per batch. The automated sample preparation setup also minimized human exposure to hazardous materials, provided highly improved ergonomics, and eliminated manual pipetting.
KeywordsSPE Tecan robot Automation Whole blood Illicit and medicinal drugs UPLC-MS/MS
The authors would like to thank Suzanne Nielsen, Marianne Rosenberg, and Jonas T. Froholdt for excellent technical assistance.
- 4.Simonsen KW, Hermansson S, Steentoft A, Linnet K (2010) J Anal Toxicol 34:332–341Google Scholar
- 7.Laloup M, Ramirez Fernandez MM, De BG, Wood M, Maes V, Samyn N (2005) J Anal Toxicol 29:616–626Google Scholar
- 8.Smink BE, Brandsma JE, Dijkhuizen A, Lusthof KJ, de Gier JJ, Egberts AC, Uges DR (2004) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 811:13–20Google Scholar
- 15.Maralikova B, Weinmann W (2004) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 811:21–30Google Scholar
- 18.Robandt PP, Reda LJ, Klette KL (2008) J Anal Toxicol 32:577–585Google Scholar
- 21.Vogeser M, Spohrer U (2006) Clin. Chem. Lab Med 44:1126–1130Google Scholar
- 24.SANCO, Off.J.Eur.Commun. 221 (2008) 8Google Scholar
- 29.Schulz M, Schmoldt A (2003) Pharmazie 58:447–474Google Scholar