Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 405, Issue 9, pp 2755–2761 | Cite as

Atomic weights: not so constant after all

  • Willi A. Brand
Feature Article

The IUPAC Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights has changed the way certain atomic weights are reported [1, 2, 3]. In particular, the fixed ‘standard atomic weight’ has been replaced by an atomic weight ‘interval’ for ten predominantly light elements (H, Li, B, C, N, O, Si, S, Cl and Tl), reflecting the variability of their isotopic composition. Although the respective span (the ‘range’) may not be large, the precise atomic weight of an element in a particular batch or reservoir has to be estimated from other material properties, or has to measured with higher precision, depending on experimental requirements. In the future, the atomic weight intervals are expected to increase with new findings, such as the discovery of new materials or isotopically exotic sources of materials, rather than becoming more tightly constrained by new measurements.

Introduction

A century ago the discovery of the stable neon isotopes, 20Ne and 22Ne, by Thomson [4] and the subsequent...

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article has benefited from discussions with Michael Rothe and Peter Sperlich, both at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena. I am indebted to Klaus Heumann for a number of valuable suggestions and for his patience and encouragement. Two anonymous reviewers made valuable suggestions which helped to improve the readability and language.

References

  1. 1.
    Wieser ME, Coplen TB (2011) Atomic weights of the elements 2009 (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 83:359–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wieser ME, Berglund M (2009) Atomic weights of the elements 2007 (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 81:2131–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coplen TB, Holden NE (2012) Atomic weights no longer constants of Nature. Chem Int 33:10–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson JJ (1912) Further experiments on positive rays. Philos Mag 24:209–253Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aston FW (1920) Isotopes and atomic weights. Nature 105:617–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Bièvre P, Peiser HS (1992) ‘Atomic weight’—the name, its history, definition, and units. Pure Appl Chem 64:1535–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang L (2009) Accurate and precise determination of isotopic ratios by MC-ICP-MS: a review. Mass Spectrom Rev 28:990–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holden NE (2004) Atomic weights and the international committee—a historical review. Chem Int 26:4–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brand WA, Coplen TB (2012) Stable isotope deltas: tiny, yet robust signatures in nature. Isot Environ Health Stud 48:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coplen TB (2011) Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:2538–2560Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    BIPM (2008) The International System of Units (SI), 8th edn. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8_en.pdf
  12. 12.
    Eiler JM, Clog M, Magyar P, Piasecki A, Sessions A, Stolper D, Deerberg M, Schlueter H-J, Schwieters J (2012) A high-resolution gas-source isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Int J Mass Spectrom. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2012.10.014
  13. 13.
    McManus JB, Zahniser MS, Nelson DD (2011) Dual quantum cascade laser trace gas instrument with astigmatic Herriott cell at high pass number. Appl Opt 50:A74–A85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Division of Inorganic Chemistry, Commission on Atomic Weights (1970) Atomic weights of the elements 1969. Pure Appl Chem 21:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for BiogeochemistryJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations