Polystyrene-coated micropallets for culture and separation of primary muscle cells
- 216 Downloads
Despite identification of a large number of adult stem cell types, current primary cell isolation and identification techniques yield heterogeneous samples, making detailed biological studies challenging. To identify subsets of isolated cells, technologies capable of simultaneous cell culture and cloning are necessary. Micropallet arrays, a new cloning platform for adherent cell types, hold great potential. However, the microstructures composing these arrays are fabricated from an epoxy photoresist 1002F, a growth surface unsuitable for many cell types. Optimization of the microstructures’ surface properties was conducted for the culture of satellite cells, primary muscle cells for which improved cell isolation techniques are desired. A variety of surface materials were screened for satellite cell adhesion and proliferation and compared to their optimal substrate, gelatin-coated Petri dishes. A 1-μm thick, polystyrene copolymer was applied to the microstructures by contact printing. A negatively charged copolymer of 5% acrylic acid in 95% styrene was found to be equivalent to the control Petri dishes for cell adhesion and proliferation. Cells cultured on control dishes and optimal copolymer-coated surfaces maintained an undifferentiated state and showed similar mRNA expression for two genes indicative of cell differentiation during a standard differentiation protocol. Experiments using additional contact-printed layers of extracellular matrix proteins collagen and gelatin showed no further improvements. This micropallet coating strategy is readily adaptable to optimize the array surface for other types of primary cells.
KeywordsBioanalytical methods Biomaterials Cell systems Single cell analysis
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01EB007612) to NLA, a Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy Weisman Fellowship to NCD, and an MDA infrastructure Grant to JNK. We are grateful to Pavak Shah for his microscopy assistance and Philip Gach for his guidance with manuscript preparation.
- 5.Wells DJ, Wells KE (2005) What do animal models have to tell us regarding Duchenne muscular dystrophy? Acta Myol 24(3):172–180Google Scholar
- 11.DiPrimio N, McPhee SW, Samulski RJ (2010) Adeno-associated virus for the treatment of muscle diseases: toward clinical trials. Curr Opin Mol Ther 12(5):553–560Google Scholar
- 13.Jankowski RJ, Huard J (2004) Myogenic cellular transplantation and regeneration: sorting through progenitor heterogeneity. Panminerva Med 46(1):81–91Google Scholar
- 16.Wang Y, Young G, Aoto PC, Pai JH, Bachman M, Li GP, Sims CE, Allbritton NL (2007) Broadening cell selection criteria with micropallet arrays of adherent cells. Cytometry A 71(10):866–874Google Scholar
- 17.Shadpour H, Sims CE, Thresher RJ, Allbritton NL (2009) Sorting and expansion of murine embryonic stem cell colonies using micropallet arrays. Cytometry A 75(2):121–129Google Scholar
- 20.Gunn NM, Bachman M, Li GP, Nelson EL (2010) Fabrication and biological evaluation of uniform extracellular matrix coatings on discontinuous photolithography generated micropallet arrays. J Biomed Mater Res A 95(2):401–412Google Scholar
- 21.Shadpour H, Sims CE, Allbritton NL (2009) Enrichment and expansion of cells using antibody-coated micropallet arrays. Cytometry A 75(7):609–618Google Scholar
- 28.Coopman PJ, Do MT, Thompson EW, Mueller SC (1998) Phagocytosis of cross-linked gelatin matrix by human breast carcinoma cells correlates with their invasive capacity. Clin Cancer Res 4(2):507–515Google Scholar