Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 402, Issue 3, pp 1123–1136 | Cite as

Phytoestrogen biomonitoring: an extractionless LC-MS/MS method for measuring urinary isoflavones and lignans by use of atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI)

  • Daniel L. Parker
  • Michael E. Rybak
  • Christine M. Pfeiffer
Original Paper

Abstract

We present here a high-performance liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantifying phytoestrogenic isoflavones (daidzein, equol, genistein, and O-desmethylangolensin) and lignans (enterodiol and enterolactone) in urine without the use of extraction or the preconcentration techniques inherent in existing methods. The development of this concept was made possible by use of atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI); an ionization technique that we found to improve analyte sensitivity relative to electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization for this particular group of compounds. The analytical performance of this method was equal to or exceeded that of comparable methods. Between-run coefficients of variation (CVs) across three quality control (QC) pool levels analyzed in duplicate over 20 days were 3.1–5.8% CV; within-run CVs were 2.3–6.0%. Accuracy, as determined by average spike recovery in QC pools, was generally within ±10% of being quantitative (100%). Relative limits of detection were 0.04–0.4 ng/mL urine, with absolute detection limits as low as 0.1 pg. This method was applied to the analysis of >2,500 urine specimens for the 2005–2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The method was capable of quantifying these compounds in 95–100% of study samples. This work is the first ever report of using APPI for the LC-MS/MS determination of these compounds in urine. It is also the first method of its kind to do so without any need for analyte extraction or preconcentration prior to analysis.

Keywords

Isoflavones Lignans Phytoestrogens Urine Atmospheric pressure photoionization Electrospray Mass spectrometry ESI APCI APPI 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge Donna J. LaVoie, M.T. (A.S.C.P) and David T. Nguyen, B.S., who conducted many of the experiments and analyses associated with this project. We would also like to pay special tribute to Nigel P. Botting, PhD, who sadly passed away this year. We owe a good deal of our success in developing and implementing quality methods for assessing phytoestrogen exposure to Nigel and the efforts of his research group at the University of St. Andrews to provide consistently high-quality analyte and internal standards. He will be dearly missed.

References

  1. 1.
    Nielsen ILF, Williamson G (2007) Review of the factors affecting bioavailability of soy isoflavones in humans. Nutr Cancer 57:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milder IE, Arts IC, van de Putte B, Venema DP, Hollman PC (2005) Lignan contents of Dutch plant foods: a database including lariciresinol, pinoresinol, secoisolariciresinol and matairesinol. Br J Nutr 93:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clavel T, Doré J, Blaut M (2006) Bioavailability of lignans in human subjects. Nutr Res Rev 19:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong JY, Qin LQ (2010) Soy isoflavones consumption and risk of breast cancer incidence or recurrency: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Tr 125:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buck K, Zaineddin AK, Vrieling A, Linselsen J, Chang-Claude J (2010) Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 92:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yan L, Spitznagel EL (2009) Soy consumption and prostate cancer risk in men: a revisit of a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 89:1155–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamilton-Reeves JM, Vazquez G, Duval SJ, Phipps WR, Kurzer MS, Messina MJ (2010) Clinical studies show no effects of soy protein or isoflavones on reproductive hormones in men: results of a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 94:997–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobs A, Wegewitz U, Sommerfeld C, Grossklaus R, Lampen A (2009) Efficacy of isoflavones in relieving vasomotor menopausal symptoms—a systematic review. Mol Nutr Food Res 53:1084–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howes LG, Howes JB, Knight DC (2006) Isoflavone therapy for menopausal flushes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 55:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu J, Ho SC, Su XY, Chen WQ, Zhang CX, Chen YM (2010) Effect of long-term intervention of soy isoflavones on bone mineral density in women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bone 44:948–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson J, Dwyer J, Adlercreutz H, Scalbert A, Jacques P, McCullough ML (2010) Dietary lignans: physiology and potential for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Nutr Rev 68:571–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan A, Yu D, Demark-Wahnefried W, Franco OH, Lin X (2009) Meta analysis of the effects of flaxseed interventions on blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr 90:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grynkiewicz G, Ksyciańska H, Ramza J, Zagrodzka J (2005) Chromatographic quantification of isoflavones (why and how). Acta Chromatogr 15:31–65Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prasain JK, Wang CC, Barnes S (2004) Mass spectrometric methods for the determination of flavonoids in biological samples. Free Radic Biol Med 37:1324–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoikkala AA, Schiavoni E, Wähälä K (2003) Analysis of phyto-oestrogens in biological matrices. Br J Nutr 89:S5–S18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wyns C, Bolca S, De Keukeleire D, Heyerick A (2010) Development of a high-throughput LC/APCI-MS method for the determination of thirteen phytoestrogens including gut microbial metabolites in human urine and serum. J Chromatogr B 878:949–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Locati D, Morandi S, Cupisti A, Ghiadoni L, Arnold A (2005) Characterization and quantification of soy isoflavone metabolites in serum of renal transplanted patients by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Comm Mass Spectrom 22:229–234Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prasain JK, Arabshahi A, Moore DR II, Greendale GA, Wyss JM, Barnes S (2010) Simultaneous determination of 11 phytoestrogens in human serum using a 2-min liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. J Chromatogr B 878:994–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu J, Wu Q, Qaio S, Yu Z, Jin N, Yu B (2009) Simultaneous determination of phytoestrogens and key metabolites in breast cancer patients’ urine by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharmaceut Biomed 50:939–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rybak ME, Parker DL, Pfeiffer CM (2008) Determination of urinary phytoestrogens by HPLC–MS/MS: a comparison of atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and electrospray ionization (ESI). J Chromatogr B 861:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grace PB, Mistry NS, Carter MH, Leathem AJC, Teale P (2007) High throughput quantification of phytoestrogens in human urine and serum using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). J Chromatogr B 853:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuijsten A, Buijsman MNCP, Arts ICW, Mulder PPJ, Hollman PCH (2005) A validated method for the quantification of enterodiol and enterolactone in plasma using isotope dilution liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 822:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuklenyik Z, Ye XY, Reich JA, Needham LL, Calafat AM (2004) Automated online and off-line solid-phase extraction methods for measuring isoflavones and lignans in urine. J Chromatogr Sci 42:495–500Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pérez-Jiménez J, Hubert J, Hooper L, Cassidy A, Manach C, Williamson G, Scalbert A (2010) Urinary metabolites as biomarkers of polyphenol intake in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 92:801–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011) U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed 19 July 2011
  26. 26.
    Valentín-Blasini L, Blount BC, Rogers HS, Needham LL (2000) HPLC-MS/MS method for the measurement of seven phytoestrogens in human serum and urine. J Exposure Anal Environ Epidemiol 10:799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bos SJ, van Leeuwen SM, Karst U (2006) From fundamentals to applications: recent developments in atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 384:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Syage JA, Short LC, Cai S-S (2008) Atmospheric pressure photoionization—the second source for LC-MS? LC GC N Am 26:286+Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gustafsson JE, Uzaueda HR (1978) The influence of citrate and phosphate on the Mancini single radial immunodiffusion technique and suggested improvements for the determination of urinary albumin. Clin Chim Acta 90:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caudill SP, Schleicher RL, Pirkle JL (2008) Multi-rule quality control for the age-related eye disease study. Stat Med 27:4094–4106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taylor JK (1987) Quality assurance of chemical measurement. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raffaelli A, Saba A (2003) Atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 22:318–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kauppila TJ, Kuuranne T, Meurer EC, Eberlin MN, Kotiaho T, Kostianien R (2002) Atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry. Ionization mechanism and the effect of solvent on the ionization of naphthalenes. Anal Chem 74:5470–5479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoshioka N, Akiyama Y, Teranishi K (2004) Rapid simultaneous determination of o-phenylphenol, diphenyl, thiabendazole, imazalil and its major metabolite in citrus fruits by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry using atmospheric pressure photoionization. J Chromatogr A 1022:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taylor JI, Grace PB, Bingham SA (2005) Optimization of conditions for the enzymatic hydrolysis of phytoestrogen conjugates in urine and plasma. Anal Biochem 341:220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hosoda K, Furuta T, Ishii K (2010) Simultaneous determination of glucuronic acid and sulfuric acid conjugated metabolites of daidzein and genistein in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 878:628–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clarke DB, Lloyd AS, Botting NP, Oldfield MF, Needs PF, Wiseman H (2002) Measurement of intact sulfate and glucuronide phytoestrogen conjugates in human urine using isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with [13C3]isoflavone internal standards. Anal Biochem 309:158–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin RF (2000) General Deming regression for estimating systematic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. Clin Chem 46:100–104Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Twomey PJ (2006) How to use difference plots in quantitative method comparison studies. Ann Clin Biochem 43:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel L. Parker
    • 1
  • Michael E. Rybak
    • 1
  • Christine M. Pfeiffer
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNational Center for Environmental HealthAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations