Visualization of phosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin in mouse tongue body by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry
- 335 Downloads
The mammalian tongue is one of the most important organs during food uptake because it is helpful for mastication and swallowing. In addition, taste receptors are present on the surface of the tongue. Lipids are the second most abundant biomolecules after water in the tongue. Lipids such as phosphatidylcholine (PC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and sphingomyelin (SM) are considered to play fundamental roles in the mediation of cell signaling. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is powerful tool for determining and visualizing the distribution of lipids across sections of dissected tissue. In this study, we identified and visualized the PC, LPC, and SM species in a mouse tongue body section with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-IMS. The ion image constructed from the peaks revealed that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-containing PC, LPC, linoleic acid-containing PC and SM (d18:1/16:0), and oleic acid-containing PC were mainly distributed in muscle, connective tissue, stratified epithelium, and the peripheral nerve, respectively. Furthermore, the distribution of SM (d18:1/16:0) corresponded to the distribution of nerve tissue relating to taste in the stratified epithelium. This study represents the first visualization of PC, LPC and SM localization in the mouse tongue body.
KeywordsImaging mass spectrometry Mouse tongue body Phosphatidylcholine Lysophosphatidylcholine Sphingomyelin Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
This work was supported by the Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Researchers for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry (BRAIN) to N. Z.
- 1.Mistretta CM (1991) In: Getchell T, Doty R, Bartoshuk L, Snow J (eds) Developmental neurobiology of taste: smell and taste in health and disease. Raven, New York, pp 653–668Google Scholar
- 3.Yamashita A, Sugiura T, Waku K (1997) J Biochem 122:1–16Google Scholar
- 4.Murakami M, Nakatani Y, Atsumi G, Inoue K, Kudo I (1997) Crit Rev Immunol 17:225–283Google Scholar
- 18.Zaima N, Goto-Inoue N, Adachi K, Setou M (2011) J Oleo Sci 60:93–98Google Scholar
- 20.Shimma S, Sugiura Y, Hayasaka T, Hoshikawa Y, Noda T, Setou M (2007) J Chromatogr B 885:98–103Google Scholar
- 21.Zaima N, Matsuyama Y, Setou M (2009) J Oleo Sci 58:267–273Google Scholar
- 26.Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH (1957) J Biol Chem 226:497–509Google Scholar
- 27.Taguchi R, Houjou T, Nakanishi H, Yamazaki T, Ishida M, Imagawa M, Shimizu T (2005) J Chromatogr B 823:26–36Google Scholar
- 29.Futo T, Hitaka T, Mizutani T, Okuyama H, Watanabe K, Totsuka T (1989) J Neurol Sci 129:97–105Google Scholar
- 33.Yang LY, Kuksis A, Myher JJ, Steiner G (1995) J Lipid Res 36:125–136Google Scholar