Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 399, Issue 1, pp 331–336 | Cite as

Clay pigment structure characterisation as a guide for provenance determination—a comparison between laboratory powder micro-XRD and synchrotron radiation XRD

  • Silvie ŠvarcováEmail author
  • Petr Bezdička
  • David Hradil
  • Janka Hradilová
  • Ivo Žižak
Paper in Forefront

Abstract

Application of X-ray diffraction (XRD)-based techniques in the analysis of painted artworks is not only beneficial for indisputable identification of crystal constituents in colour layers, but it can also bring insight in material crystal structure, which can be affected by their geological formation, manufacturing procedure or secondary changes. This knowledge might be helpful for art historic evaluation of an artwork as well as for its conservation. By way of example of kaolinite, we show that classification of its crystal structure order based on XRD data is useful for estimation of its provenance. We found kaolinite in the preparation layer of a Gothic wall painting in a Czech church situated near Karlovy Vary, where there are important kaolin deposits. Comparing reference kaolin materials from eight various Czech deposits, we found that these can be differentiated just according to the kaolinite crystallinity. Within this study, we compared laboratory powder X-ray micro-diffraction (micro-XRD) with synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction analysing the same real sample. We found that both techniques led to the same results.

Figure

XRD patterns of kaolins from Czech deposits compared with a XRD pattern from a wall painting found in St. Maria-Magdalena Church in Bor.

Keywords

Powder X-ray micro-diffraction Synchrotron radiation Kaolinite Wall painting Pigment provenance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank restorer Václav Potůček for providing artwork samples and versatile cooperation. The authors also acknowledge Lubomír Smrčok from the Institute of Inorganic Chemistry SAS, Bratislava, Slovakia, for his valuable help in preparing this paper. This work was supported by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AV0Z40320502 and M200320901) and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MSM 6046144603).

References

  1. 1.
    Hradil D, Grygar T, Hradilová J, Bezdička P, Grünwaldová V, Fogaš I, Miliani C (2007) Microanalytical identification of Pb–Sb–Sn yellow pigment in historical European paintings and its differentiation from lead tin and Naples yellow. J Cult Herit 8:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Švarcová S, Hradil D, Hradilová J, Kočí E, Bezdička P (2009) Micro-analytical evidence of origin and degradation of copper pigments found in Bohemian Gothic murals. Anal Bional Chem 395:2037–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotulanová E, Bezdička P, Hradil D, Hradilová J, Švarcová S, Grygar T (2009) Degradation of lead-based pigments by salt solutions. J Cult Herit 10:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Šímová V, Bezdička P, Hradilová J, Hradil D, Grygar T (2005) X-ray powder microdiffraction for routine analysis of paintings. Powder Diffr 20(3):224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Švarcová S, Kočí E, Bezdička P, Hradil D, Hradilová J (2010) Evaluation of laboratory powder X-ray micro-diffraction for applications in the field of cultural heritage and forensic science. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:1061–1076Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aron L (2000) Excursion guide. In: XVI Conference on Clay Mineralogy and Petrology, Karlovy Vary, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konta J (1995) Clay and man: clay raw materials in the service of man. Appl Clay Sci 10:275–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinckley DN (1963) Variability in “crystallinity” values among the kaolin deposits of the coastal plain of Georgia and South Carolina. In: 11th National Conference on Clays and Clay MineralsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plançon A, Giese RF, Snyder R (1988) The Hinckley index for kaolinites. Clay Miner 23:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aparicio P, Galán E, Ferrell RE (2006) A new kaolinite order index based on XRD profile fitting. Clay Miner 41:811–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aparicio P, Galán E (1999) Mineralogical interference on kaolinite crystallinity index measurements. Clays Clay Miner 47:12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erko A, Schäfers F, Firsov A, Peatman WB, Eberhardt W, Signorato R (2004) The BESSY X-ray microfocus beamline project. Spectrochim Acta B 59:1543–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Centre for Diffraction Data (2004) JCPDS PDF-2 database. Newtown Square, PA, USA, release 54Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergmann J, Friedel P, Kleeberg R (1998) BGMN—a new fundamental parameters based Rietveld program for laboratory X-ray sources, it's use in quantitative analysis and structure investigations. CPD Newsl 20:5–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kužvart M (1984) Ložiska nerudních surovin (Deposits of non-metallic raw materials). Academia, PragueGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvie Švarcová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Petr Bezdička
    • 1
  • David Hradil
    • 1
  • Janka Hradilová
    • 2
  • Ivo Žižak
    • 3
  1. 1.ALMA LaboratoryInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry of the AS CR, v.v.i.Husinec-ŘežCzech Republic
  2. 2.ALMA LaboratoryAcademy of Fine Arts in Prague, U Akademie 4Praha 7Czech Republic
  3. 3.Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialen und EnergieBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations