Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 398, Issue 2, pp 759–768 | Cite as

FRET detection of Octamer-4 on a protein nanoarray made by size-dependent self-assembly

  • Phat L. Tran
  • Jessica R. Gamboa
  • David J. You
  • Jeong-Yeol Yoon
Original Paper

Abstract

An alternative approach for fabricating a protein array at nanoscale is suggested with a capability of characterization and/or localization of multiple components on a nanoarray. Fluorescent micro- and nanobeads each conjugated with different antibodies are assembled by size-dependent self-assembly (SDSA) onto nanometer wells that were created on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) substrate by electron beam lithography (EBL). Antibody-conjugated beads of different diameters are added serially and electrostatically attached to corresponding wells through electrostatic attraction between the charged beads (confirmed by zeta potential analysis) and exposed p-doped silicon substrate underneath the PMMA layer. This SDSA method is enhanced by vibrated-wire-guide manipulation of droplets on the PMMA surface containing nanometer wells. Saturation rates of antibody-conjugated beads to the nanometer patterns are up to 97% under one component and 58–70% under two components nanoarrays. High-density arrays (up to 40,000 wells) could be fabricated, which can also be multi-component. Target detection utilizes fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from fluorescent beads to fluorescent-tagged secondary antibodies to Octamer-4 (Oct4), which eliminates the need for multiple steps of rinsing. The 100 nm green beads are covalently conjugated with anti-Oct4 to capture Oct4 peptides (39 kDa); where the secondary anti-Oct4 and F(ab)2 fragment of anti-gIgG tagged with phycoerythrin are then added to function as an indicator of Oct4 detection. FRET signals are detected through confocal microscopes, and further confirmed by Fluorolog3 spectrofluorometer. The success rates of detecting Oct4 are 32% and 14% of the beads in right place under one and two component nanoarrays, respectively. Ratiometric FRET is used to quantify the amount of Oct4 peptides per each bead, which is estimated about 2 molecules per bead.

Keywords

E-beam lithography Nanometer pattern generation system Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) Wire-guide droplet manipulation 

Supplementary material

216_2010_3990_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (441 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 441 kb)
ESM 2

(WMV 4013 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nicolan DV, Demers L, Ginger DS (2005) Microarray technology and its applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wingren C, Borrebaeck CAK (2007) Progress in miniaturization of protein arrays—a step closer to high density nanoarrays. Drug Discov Today 12:813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacBeath G (2002) Protein microarrays and proteomics. Nat Genet 32:526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasnma PK, Drake B, Marti O, Gould SA, Prater CB (1989) The scanning ion-conductance microscope. Science 243:641–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee KB, Lim JH, Mirkin CA (2003) Protein nanostructures formed via direct-write dip-pen nanolithography. J Am Chem Soc 125:5588–5589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tseng AA, Chen K, Chen CD, Ma KJ (2003) Electron beam lithography in nanoscale fabrication: recent development. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 26:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li HW, Muir BVO, Fichet G, Huck WTS (2003) Nanocontact printing: a route to sub-50 nm-scale chemical and biological patterning. Langmuir 19:1963–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petsko GA, Ringe D (2004) Protein structure and function. New Science, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanash S (2008) Diseases proteomes. Nature 422:226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Strumpf D, Takahashi K, Yagi R, Rossant J (2005) Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123:917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vega RA, Maspoch D, Salaita K, Mirkin CA (2005) Nanoarrays of single virus particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:6013–6015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salaita K, Wang Y, Fragala J, Vega RA, Liu C, Mirkin CA (2006) Massively parallel dip-pen nanolithography with 55,000-pen two-dimensional arrays. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7220–7223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang SH, Kim YJ, Yeung ES (2007) Detection of single-molecule DNA hybridization by using dual-color total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Anal Bionanl Chem 387:2663–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang S, Chen Y (2008) Ultrasensitive fluorescence detection of single protein molecules manipulated electrically on Au nanowires. Nano Lett 8:2829–2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Powell T, Yoon JY (2006) Fluorescent biorecognition of gold nanoparticle-IgG conjugates self-assembled on e-beam patterns. Biotechnol Prog 22:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Powell TB, Tran PL, Kim K, Yoon JY (2009) Size-dependent self-assembly of submicron/nano beads-protein conjugates for construction of a protein nanoarray. Mater Sci Eng C 29:2459–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoon JY, You DJ (2008) Backscattering particle immunoassays in wire-guide droplet manipulations. J Biol Eng 2:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lynch M, Mosher C, Huff J, Nettikadan S, Johnson J, Henderson E (2004) Functional protein nanoarrays for biomarker profiling. Proteomics 4:1695–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramanujan CS, Sumitomo K, de Planque MRR, Hibino H, Torimitsu K, Ryan JF (2007) Self-assembly of vesicle nanoarrays on Si: a potential route to high density functional protein arrays. Appl Phys Lett 90:033901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delehanty JB, Ligler FS (2002) A microarray immunoassay for simultaneous detection of proteins and bacteria. Anal Chem 74:5681–5687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Narra HP, Cordes MHJ, Ochman H (2008) Structural features and the persistance of acquired proteins. Proteomics 8:4772–4781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ciruela F (2008) Fluorescence-based methods in the study of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bacher G, Szymanski WW, Kaufman SL, Zoller P, Blaas D, Allmaier G (2001) Charge-reduced nano electrospray ionization combined with differential mobility analysis of peptides, proteins, glycoproteins, noncovalent protein complexes and viruses. J Mass Spectrometry 36:1038–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hartman WK, Saptharishi N, Yang XY, Mitra G, Soman G (2004) Characterization and analysis of thermal denaturation of antibodies by size exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography with quadruple detection. Anal Biochem 325:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leonard FP, Elliot JT, Tsai DH, Zachariah MR, Tarlov MJ (2008) Determination of protein aggregation with differential mobility analysis: application to IgG antibody. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1214–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tadross MR, Park SA, Veeramani B, Yue DT (2009) Robust approaches to quantitative ratiometric FRET imaging of CFP/YFP fluorophores under confocal microscopy. J Microsc 233:192–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ko S, Grant SA (2003) Development of a novel FRET method for detection of Listeria and Salmonella. Sens Actuators, B 96:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang CY, Yeh HC, Kuroki MT, Wang TH (2005) Single-quantum-dot-based DNA nanosensor. Nat Mater 4:826–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boehm MK, Woof JM, Kerr MA, Perkins SJ (1999) The Fab and Fc fragments of IgA1 exhibit a different arrangement from that in IgG: a study by X-ray and neutron solution scattering and homology modeling. J Mol Biol 286(5):1421–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haustein E, Jahnz M, Schwille P (2003) Triple FRET: a tool for studying long-range molecular interactions. Chem Phys Chem 4:745–748Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phat L. Tran
    • 1
  • Jessica R. Gamboa
    • 2
  • David J. You
    • 2
  • Jeong-Yeol Yoon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering Graduate Interdisciplinary ProgramThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations