Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 398, Issue 1, pp 571–576 | Cite as

Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin

  • Sandra Biedermann
  • Patrik Tschudin
  • Koni GrobEmail author
Technical Note


Of 13 thermal printing papers analyzed, 11 contained 8–17 g/kg bisphenol A (BPA). When taking hold of a receipt consisting of thermal printing paper for 5 s, roughly 1 μg BPA (0.2–6 μg) was transferred to the forefinger and the middle finger if the skin was rather dry and about ten times more if these fingers were wet or very greasy. This amount transferred to dry skin was neither significantly increased when taking hold of the paper at up to 10 sites, nor reduced when BPA-free paper was contacted afterwards. After 60–90 min, BPA applied to the skin as a solution in ethanol was only partially or no longer at all extractable with ethanol, whereas BPA transferred to the skin by holding thermal printer paper remained largely extractable after 2 h. This suggests that penetration of the skin depends on the conditions. Extractability experiments did not enable us to conclude whether BPA passes through the skin, but indicated that it can enter the skin to such a depth that it can no longer be washed off. If this BPA ends up in the human metabolism, exposure of a person repeatedly touching thermal printer paper for 10 h/day, such as at a cash register, could reach 71 μg/day, which is 42 times less than the present tolerable daily intake (TDI). However, if more than just the finger pads contact the BPA-containing paper or a hand cream enhances permeability of the skin, this margin might be smaller.


Thermal printer paper as used in numerous every-day-applications


Thermal printer receipt Skin contact Exposure to bisphenol A Skin permeability 


  1. 1.
    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2006) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a request from the Commission related to 2,2-bis(4-hydroxphenyl)propane (bisphenol A) question number EFSA-Q-2005–100, adopted on 29 November 2006. The EFSA Journal 428:1–75Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NTP (2008) NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A, September 2008, NIH Publication No. 08 – 5994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myers JP et al (2009) Environ Health Perspect 117:309–314Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EFSA (2006) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on bisphenol A. The EFSA Journal 428:1–75Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EFSA (2008) Opinion on the toxicokinetics of bisphenol A. The EFSA Journal 759:1–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kietzmann M, Kränke P, Möder M, Schrader S, Wahren M (1999) Isotopes Environ Health Stud 35:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaddar N, Harthé C, Déchaud H, Mappus E, Pugeat M (2008) J Toxicol Environ Health 71:471–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biedermann-Brem S, Grob K, Fjeldal P (2008) Eur Food Res Technol 227:1053–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of ZürichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Public Radio DRSBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations